Elena Marie Enseñado, Jurian Edelenbos, Leon van den Dool
{"title":"The Rules of Engagement: Conditions for City-To-City Learning on Climate Change Policy","authors":"Elena Marie Enseñado, Jurian Edelenbos, Leon van den Dool","doi":"10.1002/eet.70007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.70007","url":null,"abstract":"<p>City representatives actively share and seek knowledge, experiences, and solutions to address climate change challenges. This research investigates the question: What conditions explain engagement in city-to-city learning on climate change policy? To answer this, the study defines engagement as an active, directed approach of sharing and seeking policy information. It identifies 14 potential conditions influencing engagement, categorized into five broad areas: internal context, partner attributes, intercity relations, boundary spanners, and individual characteristics. Using a global survey and quantitative analyses, the study determines the most influential conditions. Findings highlight the importance of individual characteristics—particularly the frequency of working on climate change-related issues and the number of years an individual has worked for the city. Additionally, internal context, especially local pressures, plays a crucial role in shaping engagement in C2C learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":47396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Policy and Governance","volume":"35 5","pages":"794-807"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eet.70007","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145243083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Carolijn van Noort, Judith van Leeuwen, Hilde Toonen, Jan van Tatenhove, Päivi Haapasaari, Wesley Flannery, Kåre Nolde Nielsen, Ben Boteler, Cristian Passarello, Sun Cole Seeberg Dyremose, Kamilla Rathcke, Riku Varjopuro
{"title":"A Multi-Layered Collaborative Marine Governance Model: Evaluating Change and Innovation of Marine Governance Arrangements","authors":"Carolijn van Noort, Judith van Leeuwen, Hilde Toonen, Jan van Tatenhove, Päivi Haapasaari, Wesley Flannery, Kåre Nolde Nielsen, Ben Boteler, Cristian Passarello, Sun Cole Seeberg Dyremose, Kamilla Rathcke, Riku Varjopuro","doi":"10.1002/eet.70002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.70002","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Marine ecosystems are facing substantial stress due to global challenges that have escalated in magnitude and impact. The European Green Deal (EGD) can act as a driver of change and innovation in marine governance. There are multiple enabling and constraining conditions to orchestrate change and innovation, as it requires coordination of multiple governance levels and across different economic sectors. Drawing on established theory and concepts, this paper introduces a Multi-layered Collaborative Marine Governance (MLCMG) Model to evaluate change and innovation of marine governance arrangements. The MLCMG model integrates multiple components: (1) marine governance arrangements (comprising actors/coalitions, rules of the game, resources, and discourses); (2) the institutional setting and structural conditions affecting collaborative processes; (3) collaborative dynamics (comprising principled engagement, shared motivation, and capacity for joint action); (4) governance capabilities of state and non-state actors to attain societal goals; and it considers the role of e-governance to lever institutional arrangements, collaborative dynamics, and governance capabilities. Process performance refers to the ways that change and innovation came about, centering the decision-making abilities and social learning potential of the public and private actors active in marine governance arrangements. Productivity performance focuses on the cumulative results of change and innovation, namely outputs, outcomes, and impacts. Using the EGD vision as a normative reference point against which governance performance can be assessed, the model offers a framework that supports studies of governance change, innovation, and performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":47396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Policy and Governance","volume":"35 5","pages":"779-793"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eet.70002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145242897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Implementing Nature-Based Solutions in Cities: Testing and Refining the Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance","authors":"Evi van Dorsselaer, Joris Voets, Claire Dupont","doi":"10.1002/eet.70000","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.70000","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Literature highlights the importance of collaborative arrangements in implementing Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) to address climate change impacts, such as the urban heat island effect. However, very little is known about the design and implementation of such collaborative arrangements. We address this gap by analysing the NBS collaborative arrangements in two European cities, Ghent (Belgium) and Heerlen (the Netherlands). To do this, we apply the Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance (IFCG), originally developed by Emerson, Nabatchi and Balogh to explore the contextual factors and drivers influencing the collaborative dynamics and their short- and long-term results. We address the following research questions: “What do collaborative arrangements for NBS in cities look like, and how do they function?” and “How useful is the IFCG for understanding NBS collaborative arrangements in cities?”. This article draws on desk research, document analysis of publicly available documentation and online data, and 17 qualitative interviews with city actors. The analysis reveals two types of collaborative arrangements: comprehensive city-wide collaborative arrangements and implementation-focused collaborative arrangements focusing on city neighbourhoods. While the IFCG captures key aspects such as network connectedness, leadership, financial resources and shared theory of action, the fragmented and evolving nature of urban NBS arrangements complicates its complete application. Based on our findings, we identify some areas for refinement. Overall, this article enhances collaborative governance theory by critically examining the IFCG and providing a deeper understanding of collaborative arrangements for NBS in urban settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Policy and Governance","volume":"35 4","pages":"761-774"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eet.70000","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144767666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Relational Responsibility and Host Communities in Complex and Contentious Environmental Situations: Coastal Fisheries and Treated Water at the Fukushima Dai'ichi Nuclear Plant, Japan","authors":"Leslie Mabon, Midori Kawabe, Naotomo Nakahara, Xiaobo Lou","doi":"10.1002/eet.70003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.70003","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Treated water releases into the Pacific from the Fukushima Dai'ichi nuclear plant in Japan have drawn opposition from fishing communities, who accused proponents of acting irresponsibly in commencing releases before gaining local support. The controversy reflects questions in social licence to operate and social impact assessment about how proponents' responsibilities to host communities encompass knowledge production and fit with broader visions for a locality. Research into geographies of responsibility—how society takes care and enacts responsibility across space and place—helps think through what it means to take responsibility for host communities. Focusing on the Fukushima Dai'ichi treated water releases, we therefore aim to explore how relational responsibility becomes manifest in a complex and emotive environmental situation. Through interviews with people working in coastal Fukushima fisheries, we find that alongside economic motivations, a desire to ‘defend’ the Fukushima coast for future generations drives cooperatives to continue fishing and demonstrate safety and quality of Fukushima seafood. Those working in fisheries understand marine radioactivity cannot neatly be managed across scales, and that providing more and better scientific data is unlikely to bring others on-side if proponents are not seen as taking responsibility for the Fukushima coast. We argue that in a complex and emotive environmental situation like Fukushima Dai'ichi, multiple actors may hold responsibilities to place and people, and that intermediary organisations are important in enabling relational responsibility. However, proponents must be cognisant of power and resourcing differentials, and ensure those assuming responsibility for place receive financial and technical support.</p>","PeriodicalId":47396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Policy and Governance","volume":"35 4","pages":"744-760"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eet.70003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144768046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Correction to “Regulations ‘Under the Weather’: Legal Factors of Stability and Change for the Implementation of Natural Stormwater Management in Finland”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/eet.70001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.70001","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Venuti F., A. Heinilä, and P. R. Davids. 2025. “Regulations ‘Under the Weather’: Legal Factors of Stability and Change for the Implementation of Natural Stormwater Management in Finland.” <i>Environmental Policy and Governance</i> 35: 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2150.</p><p>The funding statement for this article was missing. The below funding statement has been added to the Acknowledgements section:</p><p>Open access publishing facilitated by Ita-Suomen yliopisto, as part of the Wiley–FinELib agreement.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":47396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Policy and Governance","volume":"35 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eet.70001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144767657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Rethinking Knowledge Cumulation: Foregrounding Epistemic Justice in Environmental Governance Research","authors":"Laure Gosselin, Mathilde Gauquelin","doi":"10.1002/eet.2168","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2168","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Social science inquiry into environmental governance is theoretically and methodologically diverse, resulting in a large array of isolated pieces of knowledge. Scholars' reflections around knowledge cumulation focus on how separate bits of knowledge can feasibly be integrated to build a broader, consensual state of knowledge. Yet, experience shows that transferring knowledge from existing research to a new case can lead to ill-adapted governance solutions. We argue that this points to a disconnect between scholars' approaches to knowledge cumulation and cumulation efforts that create actionable knowledge. Indeed, we find there is little concrete guidance offered to scholars on which rationale should guide knowledge cumulation, limiting their capacity to effectively produce actionable knowledge. In this article, we suggest giving precedence to epistemic justice instead of strict feasibility in knowledge cumulation. As a first step, we review common blind spots in knowledge cumulation efforts and argue that a perspective grounded in epistemic justice is best suited to address (global) environmental issues. As a second step, and while acknowledging the structural and institutional limits within which scholars operate, we propose that they can contribute to a shift in the principles guiding knowledge cumulation. This transformation towards epistemic justice should be pursued already at various stages of the knowledge production process, namely in conducting research, presenting and publishing research, and communicating research to policy-makers and communities. This article is primarily directed at environmental governance scholars in the social sciences but may offer valuable insights for anyone interested in inter/trans-disciplinary and boundary-spanning approaches to science and policy-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":47396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Policy and Governance","volume":"35 4","pages":"729-743"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eet.2168","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144767646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Imperative of New and Shiny Clothes: A Discussion on Novelty and Its Effects in Water Governance Research","authors":"María Mancilla García, Örjan Bodin","doi":"10.1002/eet.2167","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2167","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Novelty is a requirement demanded from scholars by reviewers holding the keys to publication as well as by funding bodies allocating project funds and thus sometimes enabling the possibility of an academic career. In fields such as water governance research, at the intersection of research and practice, an additional pressure comes from practitioners' need to find solutions and resources to try and implement different solutions for new and ongoing management problems. Academics find themselves spending a significant amount of time and effort presenting their results and contributions as novel findings, neglecting the importance of testing and refining existing theories (new or old) as a constitutive part of advancing the field. As a result, we observe a mushrooming of concepts and perspectives presented as novel and sometimes even as a new paradigm when such labels might not always be warranted. Through this commentary, we intend to discuss what role novelty plays in water governance research, including discussing if and to what extent such framing hinders knowledge cumulation. To substantiate our discussion, we interviewed four scholars with more than 30 years of experience in water governance research on their views about novelty and on whether striving for novelty impacts the scientific endeavor of knowledge cumulation. We also offer a reflection on possible ways forward to support an academic culture where the importance of testing theory and better utilization of previous work are given more attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":47396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Policy and Governance","volume":"35 4","pages":"723-728"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eet.2167","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144768083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Forging Just Climate Policies: Reconciling Justice Perceptions in Deliberative Mini-Publics","authors":"Katariina Kulha","doi":"10.1002/eet.2165","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2165","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Demands for ambitious climate measures have been accompanied by calls for a just transition, implying policies that take into account aspects of social justice in climate change mitigation. In many countries, deliberative mini-publics, such as Citizens' Assemblies and Citizens' Juries, have been convened to develop recommendations for socially just climate policies. While experimental studies have established individuals' propensity for outcome favorability in fairness assessments, proponents of deliberative mini-publics maintain that deliberation helps launder self-interested views and produces so-called meta-consensus regarding values, beliefs, and preferences. However, deliberative mini-publics' capability to advance shared interpretations of justice in the context of climate policies has been scarcely examined. To complement this gap, this paper researches two Citizens' Juries, organized in Finland, which discussed fairness of climate policies in the fields of transport and forest use. The study applies Q methodology to map jurors' subjective justice perceptions at the beginning and at the end of the juries. Changes in the perceptions are then examined to assess whether deliberation induces the acknowledgment of the divergent notions of justice. The findings indicate, firstly, that deliberative mini-publics can enhance consensus on vulnerabilities that should be considered in policy-making. Secondly, deliberative mini-publics can help to clarify the key conflicts in perceptions of justice, even when meta-consensus on the different perceptions would not be attained.</p>","PeriodicalId":47396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Policy and Governance","volume":"35 4","pages":"696-708"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eet.2165","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144768105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mohammad Raqibul Hasan Siddique, Mahmood Hossain, A. Z. M. Manzoor Rashid, Shahriar Nasim Shuvo, Md. Zahid Hasan
{"title":"Collaboration or Capture? Unpacking the Notion of Forest Governance in Madhupur and Lawachara Forests of Bangladesh","authors":"Mohammad Raqibul Hasan Siddique, Mahmood Hossain, A. Z. M. Manzoor Rashid, Shahriar Nasim Shuvo, Md. Zahid Hasan","doi":"10.1002/eet.2166","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2166","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Co-management has widely been advocated as a means to address power imbalances in conservation, yet its implementation often reinforces existing inequalities rather than fostering equitable collaboration. However, this qualitative study, based on evidence from Madhupur and Lawachara forests in Bangladesh, demonstrates that the model functions more as a mechanism of control than genuine collaboration. Despite the rhetoric of community participation, the Forest Department (FD) retains authority by bypassing democratic processes—such as withholding support for local elections—and co-opting local elites to maintain its dominance. While a few forest users receive limited incentives, they lack decision-making power and face exclusion if they dissent. Institutions remain deliberately fragile and dependent on the FD, enabling the state and its allied elites to exploit marginalized communities through patronage networks and corrupt practices, including the strategic inclusion of forest offenders as defenders to maintain illicit control. This form of “administrative co-management” facilitates both elite and regulatory capture, undermining the intended objectives of equity and empowerment. The study recommends the establishment of robust regulatory frameworks with enforceable accountability mechanisms, meaningful decentralization with real devolution of power, and adequate livelihood support for forest-dependent communities. Embedding anti-corruption safeguards and ensuring transparency in co-management processes are essential for restoring trust and transforming forest governance from a tool of capture into one of genuine collaboration.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Policy and Governance","volume":"35 4","pages":"709-722"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144768102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Quest for Coherence in Climate Actions: The Case for Québec's Climate Strategy","authors":"Alain Fopa Tchinda, David Talbot","doi":"10.1002/eet.2164","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2164","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Studies on climate policy coherence often focus on policy components as the essential element of success by examining their objectives, instruments, and implementation practices. However, while some studies have demonstrated that it is essential to evaluate the programs or actions that translate policies into success, few have focused specifically on program coherence. This research uses monitoring sheets for programs (<i>N</i> = 177) funded under the Québec Climate Change Action Plan (CCAP) 2013–2020 to perform a comprehensive analysis of program coherence, combining relational content analysis and social network analysis. Findings suggest a failure to achieve the action plan and provide pertinent shortcomings and gaps related to the program's objectives and indicators, including challenges with collaboration and coordination. Given the complexity and cross-cutting nature of climate issues, this study contributes to the literature on policy coherence and argues in favor of program coherence for a better design and assessment of the effectiveness of climate policies and programs. Moreover, through an integrative framework for policy coherence, the study suggests adding public programs to the existing policy components for policy coherence assessment. While relying on effective collaboration and coordination, implications for practitioners include a rigorous use of various program management tools used to design, monitor, and implement public programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Policy and Governance","volume":"35 4","pages":"682-695"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eet.2164","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144768075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}