对气候行动一致性的追求:quacimbec气候战略的案例

IF 3.9 3区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Alain Fopa Tchinda, David Talbot
{"title":"对气候行动一致性的追求:quacimbec气候战略的案例","authors":"Alain Fopa Tchinda,&nbsp;David Talbot","doi":"10.1002/eet.2164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Studies on climate policy coherence often focus on policy components as the essential element of success by examining their objectives, instruments, and implementation practices. However, while some studies have demonstrated that it is essential to evaluate the programs or actions that translate policies into success, few have focused specifically on program coherence. This research uses monitoring sheets for programs (<i>N</i> = 177) funded under the Québec Climate Change Action Plan (CCAP) 2013–2020 to perform a comprehensive analysis of program coherence, combining relational content analysis and social network analysis. Findings suggest a failure to achieve the action plan and provide pertinent shortcomings and gaps related to the program's objectives and indicators, including challenges with collaboration and coordination. Given the complexity and cross-cutting nature of climate issues, this study contributes to the literature on policy coherence and argues in favor of program coherence for a better design and assessment of the effectiveness of climate policies and programs. Moreover, through an integrative framework for policy coherence, the study suggests adding public programs to the existing policy components for policy coherence assessment. While relying on effective collaboration and coordination, implications for practitioners include a rigorous use of various program management tools used to design, monitor, and implement public programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Policy and Governance","volume":"35 4","pages":"682-695"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eet.2164","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Quest for Coherence in Climate Actions: The Case for Québec's Climate Strategy\",\"authors\":\"Alain Fopa Tchinda,&nbsp;David Talbot\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eet.2164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Studies on climate policy coherence often focus on policy components as the essential element of success by examining their objectives, instruments, and implementation practices. However, while some studies have demonstrated that it is essential to evaluate the programs or actions that translate policies into success, few have focused specifically on program coherence. This research uses monitoring sheets for programs (<i>N</i> = 177) funded under the Québec Climate Change Action Plan (CCAP) 2013–2020 to perform a comprehensive analysis of program coherence, combining relational content analysis and social network analysis. Findings suggest a failure to achieve the action plan and provide pertinent shortcomings and gaps related to the program's objectives and indicators, including challenges with collaboration and coordination. Given the complexity and cross-cutting nature of climate issues, this study contributes to the literature on policy coherence and argues in favor of program coherence for a better design and assessment of the effectiveness of climate policies and programs. Moreover, through an integrative framework for policy coherence, the study suggests adding public programs to the existing policy components for policy coherence assessment. While relying on effective collaboration and coordination, implications for practitioners include a rigorous use of various program management tools used to design, monitor, and implement public programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Policy and Governance\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"682-695\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eet.2164\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Policy and Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eet.2164\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Policy and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eet.2164","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于气候政策一致性的研究往往侧重于政策组成部分,通过审查其目标、工具和实施实践,将其作为成功的基本要素。然而,尽管一些研究表明,必须评估将政策转化为成功的方案或行动,但很少有研究专门关注方案的一致性。本研究采用《曲海气候变化行动计划(CCAP) 2013-2020》资助的项目(N = 177)监测表,结合关系内容分析和社会网络分析,对项目一致性进行综合分析。调查结果表明,未能实现行动计划,并提供了与计划目标和指标相关的相关缺陷和差距,包括合作和协调方面的挑战。鉴于气候问题的复杂性和跨领域性,本研究有助于政策一致性的文献研究,并支持项目一致性,以便更好地设计和评估气候政策和项目的有效性。此外,通过政策一致性的综合框架,该研究建议在现有政策组成部分中增加公共项目,以进行政策一致性评估。在依赖于有效的协作和协调的同时,对从业者的影响包括严格使用各种用于设计、监控和实施公共项目的项目管理工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Quest for Coherence in Climate Actions: The Case for Québec's Climate Strategy

The Quest for Coherence in Climate Actions: The Case for Québec's Climate Strategy

Studies on climate policy coherence often focus on policy components as the essential element of success by examining their objectives, instruments, and implementation practices. However, while some studies have demonstrated that it is essential to evaluate the programs or actions that translate policies into success, few have focused specifically on program coherence. This research uses monitoring sheets for programs (N = 177) funded under the Québec Climate Change Action Plan (CCAP) 2013–2020 to perform a comprehensive analysis of program coherence, combining relational content analysis and social network analysis. Findings suggest a failure to achieve the action plan and provide pertinent shortcomings and gaps related to the program's objectives and indicators, including challenges with collaboration and coordination. Given the complexity and cross-cutting nature of climate issues, this study contributes to the literature on policy coherence and argues in favor of program coherence for a better design and assessment of the effectiveness of climate policies and programs. Moreover, through an integrative framework for policy coherence, the study suggests adding public programs to the existing policy components for policy coherence assessment. While relying on effective collaboration and coordination, implications for practitioners include a rigorous use of various program management tools used to design, monitor, and implement public programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Policy and Governance
Environmental Policy and Governance ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Environmental Policy and Governance is an international, inter-disciplinary journal affiliated with the European Society for Ecological Economics (ESEE). The journal seeks to advance interdisciplinary environmental research and its use to support novel solutions in environmental policy and governance. The journal publishes innovative, high quality articles which examine, or are relevant to, the environmental policies that are introduced by governments or the diverse forms of environmental governance that emerge in markets and civil society. The journal includes papers that examine how different forms of policy and governance emerge and exert influence at scales ranging from local to global and in diverse developmental and environmental contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信