International Journal for the Psychology of Religion最新文献_第7页

Assessing the Religion-Health Relationship: Introduction to the Meta-analysis by Garssen et al., and Two Commentaries 宗教与健康关系的评估：Garssen等人的元分析导论和两篇评论

IF 2.2 2区哲学

International Journal for the Psychology of Religion Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2021.1877029

M. van Elk

引用次数: 3

The Effect of Religiosity and Spirituality on Mental Health: Reply to Two Commentaries 宗教性和精神性对心理健康的影响:回复两篇评论

IF 2.2 2区哲学

International Journal for the Psychology of Religion Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2020.1861814

B. Garssen, A. Visser

引用次数: 1

Competing Forces Account for the Stability and Evolution of Religious Beliefs 竞争力量是宗教信仰稳定和演变的原因

IF 2.2 2区哲学

International Journal for the Psychology of Religion Pub Date : 2020-12-17 DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2020.1844969

Theiss Bendixen, B. Purzycki

引用次数: 6

Muslim Verbal and Active Prayer (MVAP): Measurement and Psychological Functioning of Supplications in Islam 穆斯林口头和主动祈祷（MVAP）：伊斯兰教中祷告的测量和心理功能

IF 2.2 2区哲学

International Journal for the Psychology of Religion Pub Date : 2020-12-10 DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2020.1858254

Z. Chen, Mustafa Tekke, K. Mastor, Saim Kayadibi

{"title":"Muslim Verbal and Active Prayer (MVAP): Measurement and Psychological Functioning of Supplications in Islam","authors":"Z. Chen, Mustafa Tekke, K. Mastor, Saim Kayadibi","doi":"10.1080/10508619.2020.1858254","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2020.1858254","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Prayer is an important aspect of many religions. Existing measures of prayer have mostly originated from the Christian West and emphasized various “verbal” aspects of making a supplication. An “active” aspect of prayer, in which the supplicants strive for what they pray, has not received sufficient attention despite being crucial to Muslim belief. Based on the Islamic scholar Said Nursi’s conceptualization, the current study developed and validated a 7-item, 2-factor measure of Muslim Verbal and Active Prayer (MVAP). The measure showed good construct validity in two independent Muslim samples (N = 297 and 179) in exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. It demonstrated not only convergent validity, but showed incremental validity predicting religious and psychological adjustment over and above Muslim religiosity and spirituality. In addition, the Muslim prayers invigorated and integrated Muslim religious spirituality in its expression of religious and psychological adjustment. This brief measure has potential to deepen empirical studies of Muslim psychology, and prayer research in general.","PeriodicalId":47234,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for the Psychology of Religion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10508619.2020.1858254","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44493122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Adolescent Religious Motivation: A Self-Determination Theory Approach 青少年宗教动机:一个自我决定理论的视角

IF 2.2 2区哲学

International Journal for the Psychology of Religion Pub Date : 2020-12-10 DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2020.1844968

S. Hardy, Jenae M. Nelson, Summer B. Frandsen, Amber R. Cazzell, M. Goodman

{"title":"Adolescent Religious Motivation: A Self-Determination Theory Approach","authors":"S. Hardy, Jenae M. Nelson, Summer B. Frandsen, Amber R. Cazzell, M. Goodman","doi":"10.1080/10508619.2020.1844968","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2020.1844968","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of the present set of studies was to develop a short and valid measure of religious motivation based on self-determination theory and demonstrate the role of religious motivation on youth outcomes. Participants were from five studies of religious adolescents and their parents from across the U.S (total N = 2982). Using confirmatory factor analyses we created a 12-item Religious Internalization Scale (RIS-12) capturing three forms of religious motivation: external, introjected, and identified. Relations between religious motivation and youth outcomes were assessed using structural equation modeling. In general, identified religious motivation positively predicted adaptive outcomes (e.g., prosocial behaviors, psychological well-being, and positive traits) and negatively predicted maladaptive outcomes (e.g., antisocial and health-risk behaviors, mental illness, and negative traits), whereas the inverse was largely true for external religious motivation. Introjected religious motivation was a poor predictor of outcomes. Further, identified religious motivation often remained predictive of outcomes when controlling for religious involvement. Lastly, in several cases, identified religious motivation and religious involvement interacted when predicting youth outcomes such that higher identified religious motivation strengthened links between religious involvement and outcomes. These findings validate the RIS-12 as a self-determination theory measure of religious motivation and elucidate the important role of identified religious motivation during adolescence.","PeriodicalId":47234,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for the Psychology of Religion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10508619.2020.1844968","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49078038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

Religiosity from Age 12 to 20: Stability, Change, and Bidirectional Effects of Attendance, Prayer, and Salience 从12岁到20岁的宗教信仰：稳定性、变化和出席、祈祷和突出的双向影响

IF 2.2 2区哲学

International Journal for the Psychology of Religion Pub Date : 2020-11-12 DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2020.1834745

W. J. Dyer, S. Hardy, M. Goodman

{"title":"Religiosity from Age 12 to 20: Stability, Change, and Bidirectional Effects of Attendance, Prayer, and Salience","authors":"W. J. Dyer, S. Hardy, M. Goodman","doi":"10.1080/10508619.2020.1834745","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2020.1834745","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Religiosity is a protective factor for adolescents, though research has indicated religiosity declines across adolescence. However, little research has examined how various dimensions of religiosity may change across time. With yearly data from a sample of 489 participants, the current study examined rank-order and mean level changes in religiosity from early adolescence (12 years-old) into late adolescence/emerging adulthood (20 years-old). Three dimensions of religiosity were examined, public religious practices (religious service attendance), private religious practices (prayer), and religious salience. Using cross-lagged models, reciprocal relationships between these dimensions were examined. There was significant rank-order stability, though stability was highest for attendance. The mean of all three dimensions decreased over time. The decline for attendance was initially slow though the decline increased through late adolescence. Prayer declined linearly and religious salience declined rapidly during early adolescence with the decline dampening in later adolescence and late adolescence. Each dimension was reciprocally related to the other dimensions, though this relationship differed across time. For instance, in early adolescence, attendance predicted religious salience and in late adolescence, salience predicted attendance. When significant, parent income and education were negatively associated with religiosity.","PeriodicalId":47234,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for the Psychology of Religion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10508619.2020.1834745","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45150800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

How Do Religiosity and National Identity Relate to Cosmopolitanism? An Empirical Study Using Representative Samples in Christian, Muslim, and Buddhist Societies 宗教信仰和民族认同与世界主义有何关系？基督教、穆斯林和佛教社会代表性样本的实证研究

IF 2.2 2区哲学

International Journal for the Psychology of Religion Pub Date : 2020-11-12 DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2020.1827192

R. Zhang, James H. Liu, Huajian Cai, S. Mari, X. Qu, Ahmet Suerdam

{"title":"How Do Religiosity and National Identity Relate to Cosmopolitanism? An Empirical Study Using Representative Samples in Christian, Muslim, and Buddhist Societies","authors":"R. Zhang, James H. Liu, Huajian Cai, S. Mari, X. Qu, Ahmet Suerdam","doi":"10.1080/10508619.2020.1827192","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2020.1827192","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Cosmopolitan Orientation’s (COS) relationship with personal religiosity, organizational religiosity, and national identity was examined in nationally representative samples from 19 societies (13 mainly Christian, 2 Muslim, and 4 societies with historically Buddhist influences, N = 8740). Multi-group structural equation models found that personal religiosity was a positive and significant predictor of global prosociality (willingness to help others in a global community) overall (b = .18), and in 13 of 19 societies. This relationship was stronger in countries higher on the Human Development Index. National identity was overall a weak and positive predictor of global prosociality (b = .06) and respect for cultural diversity (b = .07), but results were culturally variable. There were negative relationships between national identity and COS indicators in Germany, the UK and USA (countries with active anti-immigration discourses popularized by populist right-wing politicians). Separate analyses for different religious groups found that among Christians, personal religiosity was positively associated with global prosociality, respect for cultural differences, and cultural openness (in that order). Among Buddhists, both personal and organizational religiosity were associated with global prosociality and cultural openness. For the smaller sample of Muslims, the only significant association was the positive link between personal religiosity and global prosociality. Findings support the idea that, contrary to much established literature, there are country-level moderators, but no overall negative relationship between cosmopolitanism and religiosity or national identity at the individual-level across cultures.","PeriodicalId":47234,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for the Psychology of Religion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10508619.2020.1827192","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46170654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

The Interplay of Religious and Nonreligious Meaning-Making on Psychological Well-Being in Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients 宗教与非宗教意义制造对癌症胃肠道患者心理健康的影响

IF 2.2 2区哲学

International Journal for the Psychology of Religion Pub Date : 2020-11-12 DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2020.1834746

Dariusz Krok, B. Zarzycka, E. Telka

{"title":"The Interplay of Religious and Nonreligious Meaning-Making on Psychological Well-Being in Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients","authors":"Dariusz Krok, B. Zarzycka, E. Telka","doi":"10.1080/10508619.2020.1834746","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2020.1834746","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Previous research has identified close relationships between religious and nonreligious factors and well-being in cancer patients. This study expands on such studies by examining the interplay of religious and nonreligious meaning-making factors on psychological well-being in gastrointestinal cancer patients; 317 patients (160 women and 157 men) with gastrointestinal cancer participated in the current study. Two coping strategies were utilized: negative religious coping and meaning-focused coping. These mediated the relationship between the religious meaning system and psychological well-being and the relationship between the presence of meaning in life and psychological well-being. In contrast, the association between changes in beliefs and goals and psychological well-being was mediated by negative religious coping and the presence of meaning in life. Positive religious coping did not play a mediating role in the above relationships. The findings suggest that for cancer patients, religious and nonreligious factors do not exist in “a psychological vacuum” as separate entities, but tend to interact with each other on a basis of meaning structures.","PeriodicalId":47234,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for the Psychology of Religion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10508619.2020.1834746","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44407439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

How Education and Metacognitive Training May Ameliorate Religious Prejudices: A Randomized Controlled Trial 教育和元认知训练如何改善宗教偏见:一项随机对照试验

IF 2.2 2区哲学

International Journal for the Psychology of Religion Pub Date : 2020-10-13 DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2020.1815994

S. Moritz, Kaser Ahmed, N. Krott, Isgard Ohls, K. Reininger

{"title":"How Education and Metacognitive Training May Ameliorate Religious Prejudices: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"S. Moritz, Kaser Ahmed, N. Krott, Isgard Ohls, K. Reininger","doi":"10.1080/10508619.2020.1815994","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2020.1815994","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Religious tensions in Western countries are growing and pose a challenge to societal peace. For the present study, we examined the attitudes of Christians, Muslims, and people with no religious affiliation toward the three major monotheistic religions: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. In the framework of a randomized controlled trial, we explored the extent to which five conditions (three metacognitive, one educational, and one control) changed participants’ attitudes toward their own faith and other faiths. In the educational condition, information was conveyed in a simple narrative form, whereas in the metacognitive conditions participants were asked seemingly simple questions that frequently elicit incorrect responses followed by the correct responses along with corrective information (either immediately or after a delay). Christian and Muslim participants appraised their own religion as tolerant. The metacognitive interventions were significantly more successful than the control condition in reducing prejudice overall. Christians improved their attitudes toward Judaism and Islam in the metacognitive conditions. Muslims, however, showed more positive appraisals of Judaism and their own religion but not of Christianity (which showed a slight but nonsignificant decline) following the intervention. We discuss the possible contribution of particular questionnaire items to the latter unexpected result. Participants evaluated the information provided by the educational intervention as less interesting relative to the metacognitive approach.","PeriodicalId":47234,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for the Psychology of Religion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2020-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10508619.2020.1815994","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46532016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Attributions for Atheism: Perceptions that Atheism is a Choice are Associated with Prejudice against Atheists among Christians, but Not Jews or Nonbelievers 对无神论的归因:认为无神论是一种选择的看法与基督徒对无神论者的偏见有关，但与犹太人或非信徒无关

IF 2.2 2区哲学

International Journal for the Psychology of Religion Pub Date : 2020-10-13 DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2020.1815993

A. Moss, James Fitzpatrick, Laurie T. O’Brien

{"title":"Attributions for Atheism: Perceptions that Atheism is a Choice are Associated with Prejudice against Atheists among Christians, but Not Jews or Nonbelievers","authors":"A. Moss, James Fitzpatrick, Laurie T. O’Brien","doi":"10.1080/10508619.2020.1815993","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2020.1815993","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Is believing that atheism is a choice related to prejudice against atheists? The present research draws on attributional models of prejudice to examine the relationship between perceptions that atheism is a choice and anti-atheist prejudice among Christians, Jews, and nonbelievers. We hypothesized that Christians would be more likely than Jews (Sample 1 and 3) and nonbelievers (Samples 1, 2, and 3) to believe atheism is a choice. Further, we hypothesized that the relationship between perceptions of choice and anti-atheist prejudice would be stronger among Christians than Jews and nonbelievers. In three samples of college students and U.S. adults (N = 859), Christians were more likely than others to believe atheism is a choice and perceptions of choice uniquely predicted Christians’ prejudice toward atheists. By examining perceptions of choice, our research reveals a novel source of anti-atheist prejudice, but a source with deep roots in the psychology of prejudice.","PeriodicalId":47234,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for the Psychology of Religion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2020-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10508619.2020.1815993","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42454195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0