AI & Society最新文献

Age of Disruption 颠覆时代

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2025-04-23 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-025-02365-z

Jan Soeffner

引用次数: 0

The end AI innocence: genie is out of the bottle 结局AI天真：精灵已出瓶

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-025-02267-0

Karamjit S. Gill

引用次数: 0

Doing agency: how agents adapt in wide systems 做代理：代理如何适应广泛的系统

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-02176-8

Stephen Cowley

引用次数: 0

Adaptable robots, ethics, and trust: a qualitative and philosophical exploration of the individual experience of trustworthy AI. 适应性机器人、伦理和信任：对可信赖的人工智能个人体验的定性和哲学探索。

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-23 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01938-8

Stephanie Sheir, Arianna Manzini, Helen Smith, Jonathan Ives

{"title":"Adaptable robots, ethics, and trust: a qualitative and philosophical exploration of the individual experience of trustworthy AI.","authors":"Stephanie Sheir, Arianna Manzini, Helen Smith, Jonathan Ives","doi":"10.1007/s00146-024-01938-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01938-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Much has been written about the need for trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI), but the underlying meaning of trust and trustworthiness can vary or be used in confusing ways. It is not always clear whether individuals are speaking of a technology's trustworthiness, a developer's trustworthiness, or simply of gaining the trust of users by any means. In sociotechnical circles, trustworthiness is often used as a proxy for 'the good', illustrating the moral heights to which technologies and developers ought to aspire, at times with a multitude of diverse requirements; or at other times, no specification at all. In philosophical circles, there is doubt that the concept of trust should be applied at all to technologies rather than their human creators. Nevertheless, people continue to intuitively reason about trust in technologies in their everyday language. This qualitative study employed an empirical ethics methodology to address how developers and users define and construct requirements for trust throughout development and use, through a series of interviews. We found that different accounts of trust (rational, affective, credentialist, norms based, relational) served as the basis for individual granting of trust in technologies and operators. Ultimately, the most significant requirement for user trust and assessment of trustworthiness was the accountability of AI developers for the outputs of AI systems, hinging on the identification of accountable moral agents and perceived value alignment between the user and developer's interests.</p>","PeriodicalId":47165,"journal":{"name":"AI & Society","volume":"40 3","pages":"1735-1748"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11985637/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144015729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The AI-mediated intimacy economy: a paradigm shift in digital interactions 人工智能介导的亲密经济：数字互动的范式转变

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-02132-6

Ayşe Aslı Bozdağ

{"title":"The AI-mediated intimacy economy: a paradigm shift in digital interactions","authors":"Ayşe Aslı Bozdağ","doi":"10.1007/s00146-024-02132-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00146-024-02132-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article critically examines the paradigm shift from the attention economy to the intimacy economy—a market system where personal and emotional data are exchanged for customized experiences that cater to individual emotional and psychological needs. It explores how AI transforms these personal and emotional inputs into services, thereby raising essential questions about the authenticity of digital interactions and the potential commodification of intimate experiences. The study delineates the roles of human–computer interaction and AI in deepening personal connections, significantly impacting emotional dynamics, and underscores AI’s role in various applications, from healthcare to grief tech, highlighting both enhancements in emotional connections and potential disruptions to genuine human interactions. An AI-mediated framework (AMIE) is introduced to assess how AI reshapes these connections and the overall digital society through personalized interactions. This framework explores the interplay between human emotions and AI-generated responses within the new Avatar Sphere, emphasizing the necessity for regulatory measures to safeguard digital identities, recognize emotional data as intellectual property, and maintain system transparency. It highlights the critical need for maintaining genuine human interactions and advocates for context-aware consent, continuous monitoring, and cross-cultural considerations to foster ethical AI practices. Leveraging blockchain technology and decentralized autonomous organizations, the framework proposes methods to enhance individual control over emotional data, mitigating the commodification risks. The findings contribute to ongoing discussions on AI ethics, digital privacy, and the future of human-AI interactions, providing valuable insights for cultivating a responsible intimacy economy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47165,"journal":{"name":"AI & Society","volume":"40 4","pages":"2285 - 2306"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143949510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The ideals program in algorithmic fairness 理想的程序在算法的公平性

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-02106-8

Rush T. Stewart

引用次数: 0

A culture of their own? culture in robot-robot interaction 他们自己的文化？机器人与机器人互动中的文化

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-02144-2

Masoumeh Mansouri, Henry Taylor

引用次数: 0

“To us, it is still foreign”: AI and the disabled in the Global South “对我们来说，它仍然是陌生的”：人工智能和全球南方的残疾人

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-02149-x

Abdul Rohman, Diem-Trang Vo

引用次数: 0

Culturally responsive communication in generative AI: looking at ChatGPT’s advice for coming out 生成式人工智能中的文化响应性沟通：看看ChatGPT的问世建议

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-02141-5

Angela M. Cirucci, Miles Coleman, Dan Strasser, Evan Garaizar

{"title":"Culturally responsive communication in generative AI: looking at ChatGPT’s advice for coming out","authors":"Angela M. Cirucci, Miles Coleman, Dan Strasser, Evan Garaizar","doi":"10.1007/s00146-024-02141-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00146-024-02141-5","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Generative AI has captured the public imagination as a tool that promises access to expertise beyond the technical jargon and expense that traditionally characterize such infospheres as those of medicine and law. Largely absent from the current literature, however, are interrogations of generative AI’s abilities to deal in culturally responsive communication, or the expertise interwoven with culturally aware, socially responsible, and personally sensitive communication best practices. To interrogate the possibilities of cultural responsiveness in generative AI, we examine the patterns of response that characterize ChatGPT-3.5’s advice for coming out. Specifically, we submitted 100 prompts soliciting coming out advice to GPT-3.5, variegating each of those prompts slightly to account for intersectional identities. From the analysis, we find that, while the responses are largely in-line with best practices, there are also instances that might represent problematics concerning the interpellation of the user or the persons to whom one is coming out.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47165,"journal":{"name":"AI & Society","volume":"40 4","pages":"2249 - 2257"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00146-024-02141-5.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143949411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Rage against the authority machines: how to design artificial moral advisors for moral enhancement 对权威机器的愤怒：如何设计人工道德顾问以提高道德

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-02135-3

Ethan Landes, Cristina Voinea, Radu Uszkai

引用次数: 0