AI & Society最新文献_第10页

AI in situated action: a scoping review of ethnomethodological and conversation analytic studies 情境行动中的人工智能：人种方法学和会话分析研究范围综述

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01919-x

Jakub Mlynář, Lynn de Rijk, Andreas Liesenfeld, Wyke Stommel, Saul Albert

{"title":"AI in situated action: a scoping review of ethnomethodological and conversation analytic studies","authors":"Jakub Mlynář, Lynn de Rijk, Andreas Liesenfeld, Wyke Stommel, Saul Albert","doi":"10.1007/s00146-024-01919-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00146-024-01919-x","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite its elusiveness as a concept, ‘artificial intelligence’ (AI) is becoming part of everyday life, and a range of empirical and methodological approaches to social studies of AI now span many disciplines. This article reviews the scope of ethnomethodological and conversation analytic (EM/CA) approaches that treat AI as a phenomenon emerging in and through the situated organization of social interaction. Although this approach has been very influential in the field of computational technology since the 1980s, AI has only recently emerged as such a pervasive part of daily life to warrant a sustained empirical focus in EM/CA. Reviewing over 50 peer-reviewed publications, we find that the studies focus on various social and group activities such as task-oriented situations, semi-experimental setups, play, and everyday interactions. They also involve a range of participant categories including children, older participants, and people with disabilities. Most of the reviewed studies apply CA’s conceptual apparatus, its approach to data analysis, and core topics such as turn-taking and repair. We find that across this corpus, studies center on three key themes: openings and closing the interaction, miscommunication, and non-verbal aspects of interaction. In the discussion, we reflect on EM studies that differ from those in our corpus by focusing on praxeological respecifications of AI-related phenomena. Concurrently, we offer a critical reflection on the work of literature reviewing, and explore the tortuous relationship between EM and CA in the area of research on AI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47165,"journal":{"name":"AI & Society","volume":"40 3","pages":"1497 - 1527"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00146-024-01919-x.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141267170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Hunters not beggars 猎人不是乞丐

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01978-0

Mark Ressler

引用次数: 0

We’re only human after all: a critique of human-centred AI 我们终究只是人类：对以人为本的人工智能的批判

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01976-2

Mark Ryan

{"title":"We’re only human after all: a critique of human-centred AI","authors":"Mark Ryan","doi":"10.1007/s00146-024-01976-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00146-024-01976-2","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of a ‘human-centred’ artificial intelligence approach (HCAI) has substantially increased over the past few years in academic texts (1600 +); institutions (27 Universities have HCAI labs, such as Stanford, Sydney, Berkeley, and Chicago); in tech companies (e.g., Microsoft, IBM, and Google); in politics (e.g., G7, G20, UN, EU, and EC); and major institutional bodies (e.g., World Bank, World Economic Forum, UNESCO, and OECD). Intuitively, it sounds very appealing: placing human concerns at the centre of AI development and use. However, this paper will use insights from the works of Michel Foucault (mostly <i>The Order of Things</i>) to argue that the HCAI approach is deeply problematic in its assumptions. In particular, this paper will criticise four main assumptions commonly found within HCAI: human–AI hybridisation is desirable and unproblematic; humans are not currently at the centre of the AI universe; we should use humans as a way to guide AI development; AI is the next step in a continuous path of human progress; and increasing human control over AI will reduce harmful bias. This paper will contribute to the field of philosophy of technology by using Foucault's analysis to examine assumptions found in HCAI [it provides a Foucauldian conceptual analysis of a current approach (human-centredness) that aims to influence the design and development of a transformative technology (AI)], it will contribute to AI ethics debates by offering a critique of human-centredness in AI (by choosing Foucault, it provides a bridge between older ideas with contemporary issues), and it will also contribute to Foucault studies (by using his work to engage in contemporary debates, such as AI).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47165,"journal":{"name":"AI & Society","volume":"40 3","pages":"1303 - 1319"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00146-024-01976-2.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141266672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

If AI is our co-pilot, who is the captain? 如果人工智能是我们的副驾驶，那么谁是机长？

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01965-5

K. Woods

引用次数: 0

Ethics and administration of the ‘Res publica’: dynamics of democracy 公共资源 "的伦理与管理：民主的动力

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01963-7

Satinder P. Gill

引用次数: 0

Morality first? 道德吗?

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01926-y

Nathaniel Sharadin

引用次数: 0

Perceived responsibility in AI-supported medicine 人工智能辅助医疗的责任意识

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01972-6

S. Krügel, J. Ammeling, M. Aubreville, A. Fritz, A. Kießig, Matthias Uhl

引用次数: 0

Navigating technological shifts: worker perspectives on AI and emerging technologies impacting well-being 驾驭技术变革：工人对影响福祉的人工智能和新兴技术的看法

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01962-8

Tim Hinks

引用次数: 0

Why artificial intelligence needs sociology of knowledge: parts I and II 人工智能为何需要知识社会学：第一和第二部分

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-05-18 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01954-8

Harry Collins

{"title":"Why artificial intelligence needs sociology of knowledge: parts I and II","authors":"Harry Collins","doi":"10.1007/s00146-024-01954-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00146-024-01954-8","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent developments in artificial intelligence based on neural nets—deep learning and large language models which together I refer to as NEWAI—have resulted in startling improvements in language handling and the potential to keep up with changing human knowledge by learning from the internet. Nevertheless, examples such as ChatGPT, which is a ‘large language model’, have proved to have no moral compass: they answer queries with fabrications with the same fluency as they provide facts. I try to explain why this is, basing the argument on the sociology of knowledge, particularly social studies of science, notably ‘studies of expertise and experience’ and the ‘fractal model’ of society. Learning from the internet is not the same as socialisation: NEWAI has no primary socialisation such as provides the foundations of human moral understanding. Instead, large language models are retrospectively socialised by human intervention in an attempt to align them with societally accepted ethics. Perhaps, as technology advances, large language models could come to understand speech and recognise objects sufficiently well to acquire the equivalent of primary socialisation. In the meantime, we must be vigilant about who is socialising them and be aware of the danger of their socialising us to align with them rather than vice-versa, an eventuality that would lead to the further erosion of the distinction between the true and the false giving further support to populism and fascism.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47165,"journal":{"name":"AI & Society","volume":"40 3","pages":"1249 - 1263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00146-024-01954-8.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141125798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The extimate core of understanding: absolute metaphors, psychosis and large language models 理解的外在核心：绝对隐喻、精神病和大型语言模型

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-05-18 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01971-7

Marc Heimann, Anne-Friederike Hübener

{"title":"The extimate core of understanding: absolute metaphors, psychosis and large language models","authors":"Marc Heimann, Anne-Friederike Hübener","doi":"10.1007/s00146-024-01971-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00146-024-01971-7","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper delves into the striking parallels between the linguistic patterns of Large Language Models (LLMs) and the concepts of psychosis in Lacanian psychoanalysis. Lacanian theory, with its focus on the formal and logical underpinnings of psychosis, provides a compelling lens to juxtapose human cognition and AI mechanisms. LLMs, such as GPT-4, appear to replicate the intricate metaphorical and metonymical frameworks inherent in human language. Although grounded in mathematical logic and probabilistic analysis, the outputs of LLMs echo the nuanced linguistic associations found in metaphor and metonymy, suggesting a mirroring of human linguistic structures. A pivotal point in this discourse is the exploration of “absolute metaphors”—core gaps in reasoning discernible in both AI models and human thought processes and central to the Lacanian conceptualization of psychosis. Despite the traditional divide between AI research and continental philosophy, this analysis embarks on an innovative journey, utilizing Lacanian philosophy to unravel the logic of AI, using concepts established in the continental discourse on logic, rather than the analytical tradition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47165,"journal":{"name":"AI & Society","volume":"40 3","pages":"1265 - 1276"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00146-024-01971-7.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141125579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0