{"title":"Femininity in a Lithuanian Prison: A Case Study of Incarcerated Women in Lithuania","authors":"Artūras Tereškinas, Rūta Vaičiūnienė","doi":"10.1177/08883254251358839","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254251358839","url":null,"abstract":"Lithuanian prisons are known for their communal dormitory-style living, informal prisoner hierarchies, and dispersed authority, with little staff presence in prisoner housing areas. In such an environment, some incarcerated women have developed a strategy to maintain their individuality and autonomy while resisting the pressure to conform to institutional identities by (re)constructing femininity. This research explores the connection between the prison environment and femininity, the value of femininity and the female body within the Lithuanian women’s prison. Some women in prison embrace traditional femininity, using it as cultural capital and a kind of achievement. Others place little importance on femininity, believing that being clean and tidy is what matters most and that investing in femininity to be pointless, as the rewards are limited. The ambivalence toward femininity is reflected in the way women view institutionally acceptable feminine behavior and adherence to prison rules. Women internalize institutionally accepted narratives of femininity despite facing significant constraints in their ability to fulfill institutionally prescribed objectives.","PeriodicalId":47086,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics and Societies","volume":"115 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144677264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Displaced Borderlands: Civilizational Belonging in the Narratives of Kharkiv Residents Relocated to the European Union after February 2022","authors":"Tatiana Zhurzhenko","doi":"10.1177/08883254251347670","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254251347670","url":null,"abstract":"Kharkiv, an industrial and academic center of Eastern Ukraine, has transformed from a Soviet heartland into a new post-Soviet borderland, and since 2014, into a frontline city. As Ukraine has been seeking to join the European Union (EU) and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and facing Russian aggression, Kharkiv has become a battleground of various civilizationalist discourses conceiving it either as a part of the “Russian World” and a Eurasian capital, or as an outpost of Europe. This article draws on interviews with residents of Kharkiv who fled to EU countries after the beginning of the Russian invasion in February 2022. It explores how the personal experience of the war, relocation, and living abroad affected their feeling of belonging, their interpretations of the city’s identity, and their visions of its future at the border with Russia, and whether they use the vocabulary of civilizationalism to frame these experiences.","PeriodicalId":47086,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics and Societies","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144677340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Perils (and Promise) of German Colonization: Civilizational Hierarchies and Anxieties in Nineteenth-Century Romania","authors":"Andrei Sorescu","doi":"10.1177/08883254251355736","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254251355736","url":null,"abstract":"What does the constant recurrence of “colony” and “colonization” as key concepts in nineteenth-century Romanian public discourse reveal about the nexus between capital, development, civilization, nation, and state? The present article argues that, in the formative stages of Romanian nation-state-building, anxieties regarding the perceived encroachment of (Pan-)“German” expansionism were cast in explicitly “colonial” terms. As part of a self-perceivedly “backward” and underpopulated region which had historically attracted German settlement, the Danubian Principalities (and, subsequently, Romania) were increasingly feared by local political elites to be the final piece of a geopolitical puzzle, within a spatial and temporal colonial continuum of expansion. While colonization could be framed as a civilizational and economic catalyst in the 1840s and 1850s, by the 1860s, proposals for settling Germans alongside a local peasantry not yet fully emancipated from serfdom appeared increasingly dangerous and ultimately prompted a legal prohibition on colonizing “peoples of foreign race.” And, in the 1870s, the major scandal accompanying the building of Romania’s railway network by a Prussian consortium informally backed by the Prussian-born king Carol I saw the continued deployment of colonial topoi, further entangled with an antisemitic rhetoric directed against Bethel Henry Strussberg, the main concessioner. In sum, drawing upon parliamentary debates, press, pamphlets, and economic literature, the present article highlights the importance of recovering historical actors’ own categories and demonstrates the need for reflexively historicizing “colonization” and “colony,” beyond their retrospective usage as analytical categories.","PeriodicalId":47086,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics and Societies","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144578839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Introduction: Colonial Anxieties, Corruption Scandals, and Xenophobia in Nineteenth-Century Infrastructure Development in Romania","authors":"Silvia Marton, Andrei Sorescu","doi":"10.1177/08883254251352114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254251352114","url":null,"abstract":"This thematic cluster examines the historical relevance of the rail and fluvial-maritime transportation infrastructure for nation-building and modernization of the Romanian Principalities (later Romania) from the 1840s to 1914. Since such transportation infrastructures were seen as both “progressive” and “disruptive,” their construction brought immense pressure on local decision-makers. The articles in this cluster share three common goals. First, they examine anxieties over the possibility that the Principalities/Romania would fall prey to economic and demographic colonization, fears generated by their asymmetrical political and economic interactions with Europe’s Great Powers and neighboring empires. We call these “colonial anxieties.” Second, contributions examine the corruption scandals befalling infrastructure construction, which generated and constantly reshaped colonial anxiety in the process of nation-state-building given the Great Powers’ imperial/colonial political and economic influence. Third, the articles historicize the semantic and political usage of “colonization” and “corruption” in nation-building and infrastructure construction, arguing that, on both accounts, reflexively situating their meanings can disentangle them from the ex-post analytical vocabulary scholars currently employ normatively.","PeriodicalId":47086,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics and Societies","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144578837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Anti-Semitism at the Intersection of Corruption and Colonialism: Continuities of Political Rhetoric in Romania from the Nineteenth Century to the Interwar Period","authors":"Raul Cârstocea","doi":"10.1177/08883254251352116","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254251352116","url":null,"abstract":"The <jats:italic>topoi</jats:italic> of “corruption” and “colonialism” that emerged in nineteenth-century Romania in connection to infrastructure projects and the anxieties related to the prominence of foreign capital therein converged into an anti-Semitism that acted as a proxy to displace both. Around 1900, an emerging far-right further radicalized this rhetoric, with Alexandru C. Cuza (1857–1947), nicknamed “the patriarch of Romanian anti-Semitism,” representing a conveyor belt between the state-driven institutional anti-Semitism of nineteenth-century Romania and the grassroots version that would become characteristic of interwar Romanian fascism. Drawing on parliamentary debates, press articles, and the numerous pamphlets and scientific publications of the prolific Cuza, this article focuses on his re-fashioning of the nineteenth-century vision of infrastructure projects relying heavily on foreign capital into a nexus for thinking about corruption, colonialism, and anti-Semitism. It argues that Cuza helped to turn economic matters explicitly political, adding to them—in synchronicity with similar developments across Europe—a populist component that ushered in the development of a native fascist movement, for which he acted as a godfather. The interwar legionary movement adapted and radicalized the nineteenth-century nexus that identified Jews as simultaneously responsible for corruption and as agents of colonial powers or colonizers in their own right.","PeriodicalId":47086,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics and Societies","volume":"157 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144547092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Shades of Dependency and the Discourse on “Corruption”: Railway Concessions in Romania in the Nineteenth Century","authors":"Silvia Marton","doi":"10.1177/08883254251352113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254251352113","url":null,"abstract":"Romania progressed, in a short period of time, from an underdeveloped road network to a large railway infrastructure. Within less than 15 years, starting in the mid-1860s, with a huge financial effort and exclusively with foreign capital, several concessions built the main railway network and junctions with the neighboring Habsburg, Ottoman, and Russian empires. Around 1,400 kilometers were completed or under construction from the mid-1860s to 1879. Romanian political and administrative elites engaged in this far-reaching infrastructural building process that was, in their view, consubstantial with the nation- and state-building of a polity yearning for sovereignty. Yet the absence of domestic capital and expertise generated a strong dependency on the Great Powers, which controlled the whole railway network and its construction from a financial and a technical standpoint. This, in turn, engendered strong colonial anxieties in a region where multiple imperial peripheries overlapped with Western European powers’ formal and informal influence. Amid these anxieties and dependencies, a pervasive discourse on corruption allowed Romanian elites to reclaim their political agency and blame both the local Jewish community and political adversaries. “Corruption” may have frustrated sovereignty but preserved the belief that political agency could be reappropriated and was not definitively absent. Throughout the 1860s and 1870s, controversies over concessions opened the way toward nationalizing the growing railway network via state buybacks, as a means of avoiding dependency at a time when political autonomy was jealously guarded.","PeriodicalId":47086,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics and Societies","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144547093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Hallier Affair, Political Corruption and National Dignity in Romania in Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries","authors":"Constantin Ardeleanu","doi":"10.1177/08883254251352115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254251352115","url":null,"abstract":"In 1895, the Romanian government entered into a contractual agreement whereby the French entrepreneur Adrien Hallier was tasked with the construction of modern port facilities in the Black Sea port of Constanța. In due course, disagreements between the two partners intensified, ultimately resulting in the formation of an arbitration tribunal tasked with resolving the matter. During the dispute, political elites and the public advanced a plethora of accusations and conspiracy theories regarding the underlying motives behind the Romanian authorities’ willingness to uphold Western financial interests more than “true” and “national” interests. This article analyzes the Hallier Affair, identified by observers and historians as one of the most significant instances of political corruption in Romanian history, by examining the nexus between major infrastructure projects and political corruption between 1895 and 1900. It focuses on clientelism, abuse of public office, treason, and other charges made against government officials who supported the purportedly illegitimate financial interests of a profiteering entrepreneur and political debates on the relationship between Romanians and foreigners at a time when national(ist) forces were striving for complete independence and Romania’s integration into the “civilized world.”","PeriodicalId":47086,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics and Societies","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144547091","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Youth Activism in Poland: Perceptions of Protest and Civic Engagement","authors":"Paulina Pospieszna, Félix Krawatzek","doi":"10.1177/08883254251344204","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254251344204","url":null,"abstract":"During national crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic, government approval tends to surge. In Poland, however, there was a pronounced resistance to the government’s management of the pandemic in a context of the ongoing democratic backsliding. As part of the crisis response, the Polish right-wing government adopted measures that not only tried to contain the virus but also encroached on civil liberties. This paper sets out to understand the significance of the civic activism that flourished among young people, who took diverse grievances to the streets. An analysis of focus group discussions in two contrasting Polish cities allows us to examine perspectives on the resurgence of civic activism. Under the right-wing government, conservative youth groups received governmental support and refrained from protests, while liberals mobilized to defend democratic values. A Constitutional Tribunal ruling which imposed further restrictions on abortion served as a catalyst for protests. Irrespective of their political orientation, young Poles valued protest as a means of individual expression and as a manifestation of lived democracy. Our findings show that government opponents saw protest as an opportunity to advocate for cultural-liberal issues, while government supporters perceived it as a tipping point, signaling government failure. Despite political divisions, Polish youth stressed the importance of freedoms and human rights. The government’s exploitation of the pandemic to limit human rights led to a rallying in their defense.","PeriodicalId":47086,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics and Societies","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144260674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mateusz Błaszczyk, Piotr Pieńkowski, Yuriy Pachkovskyy, Khrystyna Ilyk, Małgorzata Felińska
{"title":"Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine as Witnessed by Ukrainian and Polish Students","authors":"Mateusz Błaszczyk, Piotr Pieńkowski, Yuriy Pachkovskyy, Khrystyna Ilyk, Małgorzata Felińska","doi":"10.1177/08883254251332297","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254251332297","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to explore the experiences of those who observe war from a distance and to gain insights into how war affects communities and societies at a distance from direct hostilities. We compare the reactions to the outbreak of war both behind (in Lviv—considered a safe city in an invaded country) and beyond (in Wrocław, Poland, which neighbors Ukraine) the frontline. These cities represent, accordingly, a post-Soviet state undergoing Westernization, and a state now belonging to the realm of liberal Western democracies. Our study is based on an empirical analysis of memoirs written by sociology students in Lviv and Wrocław during the first three months of the war in May 2022. We analyze the structure of witnessing the war, evaluate the resilience of social order in the face of war-induced threats, and highlight the similarities and differences discovered between Ukraine and Poland. The outcomes highlight fundamental ways of experiencing the war outside the hostilities. The differences between Ukrainian and Polish narratives can be interpreted in terms of how real the threat of war is but also in the wider historical and political context.","PeriodicalId":47086,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics and Societies","volume":"148 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144067114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Demagogic Normality of Polish Neo-Traditionalism: Constructing an Illiberal Imaginary","authors":"Francesco Melito","doi":"10.1177/08883254251335935","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254251335935","url":null,"abstract":"The process of democratization in Central and Eastern Europe has been shaken by the growth of counter-hegemonic narratives contesting the Western-type model of liberal democracy. The “illiberal turn” in Poland frequently targets progressive values, manifesting as a cultural war around the meaning of the signifier “normality.” This article focuses on an illiberal neo-traditionalist discourse coalition in Poland, analyzing the ideological discursive construction of “normality” from two angles. First, it empirically discloses the effort to replace the liberal collective imaginary with a neo-traditionalist alternative. Neo-traditionalism pictures an idyllic “normal” way of life, invoking a mythical past as a remedy to a perceived failure—the broken promise of the post-1989 transformation. Simultaneously, it creates images of monstrosity and abnormality to exclude different worldviews. Second, illiberal processes of normalization are presented as a demagogic, rather than populist, practice that frames “our normality” as the only scenario a rational individual can desire. Illiberal neo-traditionalism thus emerges as a demagogic and ideological mobilization to redefine what is to be considered normal in response to a performed crisis.","PeriodicalId":47086,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics and Societies","volume":"140 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143920465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}