Introduction: Colonial Anxieties, Corruption Scandals, and Xenophobia in Nineteenth-Century Infrastructure Development in Romania

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES
Silvia Marton, Andrei Sorescu
{"title":"Introduction: Colonial Anxieties, Corruption Scandals, and Xenophobia in Nineteenth-Century Infrastructure Development in Romania","authors":"Silvia Marton, Andrei Sorescu","doi":"10.1177/08883254251352114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This thematic cluster examines the historical relevance of the rail and fluvial-maritime transportation infrastructure for nation-building and modernization of the Romanian Principalities (later Romania) from the 1840s to 1914. Since such transportation infrastructures were seen as both “progressive” and “disruptive,” their construction brought immense pressure on local decision-makers. The articles in this cluster share three common goals. First, they examine anxieties over the possibility that the Principalities/Romania would fall prey to economic and demographic colonization, fears generated by their asymmetrical political and economic interactions with Europe’s Great Powers and neighboring empires. We call these “colonial anxieties.” Second, contributions examine the corruption scandals befalling infrastructure construction, which generated and constantly reshaped colonial anxiety in the process of nation-state-building given the Great Powers’ imperial/colonial political and economic influence. Third, the articles historicize the semantic and political usage of “colonization” and “corruption” in nation-building and infrastructure construction, arguing that, on both accounts, reflexively situating their meanings can disentangle them from the ex-post analytical vocabulary scholars currently employ normatively.","PeriodicalId":47086,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics and Societies","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Politics and Societies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254251352114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This thematic cluster examines the historical relevance of the rail and fluvial-maritime transportation infrastructure for nation-building and modernization of the Romanian Principalities (later Romania) from the 1840s to 1914. Since such transportation infrastructures were seen as both “progressive” and “disruptive,” their construction brought immense pressure on local decision-makers. The articles in this cluster share three common goals. First, they examine anxieties over the possibility that the Principalities/Romania would fall prey to economic and demographic colonization, fears generated by their asymmetrical political and economic interactions with Europe’s Great Powers and neighboring empires. We call these “colonial anxieties.” Second, contributions examine the corruption scandals befalling infrastructure construction, which generated and constantly reshaped colonial anxiety in the process of nation-state-building given the Great Powers’ imperial/colonial political and economic influence. Third, the articles historicize the semantic and political usage of “colonization” and “corruption” in nation-building and infrastructure construction, arguing that, on both accounts, reflexively situating their meanings can disentangle them from the ex-post analytical vocabulary scholars currently employ normatively.
19世纪罗马尼亚基础设施发展中的殖民焦虑、腐败丑闻和仇外心理
这组专题考察了19世纪40年代至1914年罗马尼亚公国(后来的罗马尼亚)的铁路和河流-海上运输基础设施对国家建设和现代化的历史意义。由于这些交通基础设施被视为“进步”和“颠覆”,它们的建设给当地决策者带来了巨大的压力。这个集群中的文章有三个共同的目标。首先,他们研究了公国/罗马尼亚可能成为经济和人口殖民的牺牲品的担忧,以及它们与欧洲列强和邻国帝国不对称的政治和经济互动所产生的恐惧。我们称之为“殖民焦虑”。其次,文章考察了基础设施建设中的腐败丑闻,由于列强的帝国/殖民政治和经济影响,这些丑闻在民族国家建设过程中产生并不断重塑殖民焦虑。第三,文章将“殖民化”和“腐败”在国家建设和基础设施建设中的语义和政治用法历史化,认为反身性地定位它们的含义可以将它们与学者们目前规范使用的前后分析词汇区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: East European Politics and Societies is an international journal that examines social, political, and economic issues in Eastern Europe. EEPS offers holistic coverage of the region - every country, from every discipline - ranging from detailed case studies through comparative analyses and theoretical issues. Contributors include not only western scholars but many from Eastern Europe itself. The Editorial Board is composed of a world-class panel of historians, political scientists, economists, and social scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信