{"title":"反犹主义在腐败和殖民主义的交叉点:政治修辞的连续性在罗马尼亚从19世纪到两次世界大战期间","authors":"Raul Cârstocea","doi":"10.1177/08883254251352116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The <jats:italic>topoi</jats:italic> of “corruption” and “colonialism” that emerged in nineteenth-century Romania in connection to infrastructure projects and the anxieties related to the prominence of foreign capital therein converged into an anti-Semitism that acted as a proxy to displace both. Around 1900, an emerging far-right further radicalized this rhetoric, with Alexandru C. Cuza (1857–1947), nicknamed “the patriarch of Romanian anti-Semitism,” representing a conveyor belt between the state-driven institutional anti-Semitism of nineteenth-century Romania and the grassroots version that would become characteristic of interwar Romanian fascism. Drawing on parliamentary debates, press articles, and the numerous pamphlets and scientific publications of the prolific Cuza, this article focuses on his re-fashioning of the nineteenth-century vision of infrastructure projects relying heavily on foreign capital into a nexus for thinking about corruption, colonialism, and anti-Semitism. It argues that Cuza helped to turn economic matters explicitly political, adding to them—in synchronicity with similar developments across Europe—a populist component that ushered in the development of a native fascist movement, for which he acted as a godfather. The interwar legionary movement adapted and radicalized the nineteenth-century nexus that identified Jews as simultaneously responsible for corruption and as agents of colonial powers or colonizers in their own right.","PeriodicalId":47086,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics and Societies","volume":"157 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-Semitism at the Intersection of Corruption and Colonialism: Continuities of Political Rhetoric in Romania from the Nineteenth Century to the Interwar Period\",\"authors\":\"Raul Cârstocea\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08883254251352116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The <jats:italic>topoi</jats:italic> of “corruption” and “colonialism” that emerged in nineteenth-century Romania in connection to infrastructure projects and the anxieties related to the prominence of foreign capital therein converged into an anti-Semitism that acted as a proxy to displace both. Around 1900, an emerging far-right further radicalized this rhetoric, with Alexandru C. Cuza (1857–1947), nicknamed “the patriarch of Romanian anti-Semitism,” representing a conveyor belt between the state-driven institutional anti-Semitism of nineteenth-century Romania and the grassroots version that would become characteristic of interwar Romanian fascism. Drawing on parliamentary debates, press articles, and the numerous pamphlets and scientific publications of the prolific Cuza, this article focuses on his re-fashioning of the nineteenth-century vision of infrastructure projects relying heavily on foreign capital into a nexus for thinking about corruption, colonialism, and anti-Semitism. It argues that Cuza helped to turn economic matters explicitly political, adding to them—in synchronicity with similar developments across Europe—a populist component that ushered in the development of a native fascist movement, for which he acted as a godfather. The interwar legionary movement adapted and radicalized the nineteenth-century nexus that identified Jews as simultaneously responsible for corruption and as agents of colonial powers or colonizers in their own right.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East European Politics and Societies\",\"volume\":\"157 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East European Politics and Societies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254251352116\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Politics and Societies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254251352116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Anti-Semitism at the Intersection of Corruption and Colonialism: Continuities of Political Rhetoric in Romania from the Nineteenth Century to the Interwar Period
The topoi of “corruption” and “colonialism” that emerged in nineteenth-century Romania in connection to infrastructure projects and the anxieties related to the prominence of foreign capital therein converged into an anti-Semitism that acted as a proxy to displace both. Around 1900, an emerging far-right further radicalized this rhetoric, with Alexandru C. Cuza (1857–1947), nicknamed “the patriarch of Romanian anti-Semitism,” representing a conveyor belt between the state-driven institutional anti-Semitism of nineteenth-century Romania and the grassroots version that would become characteristic of interwar Romanian fascism. Drawing on parliamentary debates, press articles, and the numerous pamphlets and scientific publications of the prolific Cuza, this article focuses on his re-fashioning of the nineteenth-century vision of infrastructure projects relying heavily on foreign capital into a nexus for thinking about corruption, colonialism, and anti-Semitism. It argues that Cuza helped to turn economic matters explicitly political, adding to them—in synchronicity with similar developments across Europe—a populist component that ushered in the development of a native fascist movement, for which he acted as a godfather. The interwar legionary movement adapted and radicalized the nineteenth-century nexus that identified Jews as simultaneously responsible for corruption and as agents of colonial powers or colonizers in their own right.
期刊介绍:
East European Politics and Societies is an international journal that examines social, political, and economic issues in Eastern Europe. EEPS offers holistic coverage of the region - every country, from every discipline - ranging from detailed case studies through comparative analyses and theoretical issues. Contributors include not only western scholars but many from Eastern Europe itself. The Editorial Board is composed of a world-class panel of historians, political scientists, economists, and social scientists.