CoDesign-International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts最新文献

{"title":"Bringing the autistic lifeworld to supportive technology design: an enactive approach.","authors":"Johannes Cornelis van Huizen, Jelle van Dijk, Wouter G Staal, Mascha C van der Voort","doi":"10.1080/15710882.2023.2295952","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2023.2295952","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Supportive technologies for autistic individuals are promising in principle, yet their uptake remains limited. Critics argue that in current designs of supportive technologies, autism is mostly framed as a 'disorder' whose limitations can be pragmatically compensated for. To increase uptake, designers should get a better handle on how to incorporate the full richness of the autistic experience into the design process. This paper presents an integrative framework of the autistic lifeworld, called <i>Autistic Lifeworld Design</i> (hereafter: ALD). ALD evolved in a transdisciplinary research setting, substantiated by 11 design case studies with autistic young adults as well as theoretical inquiries into enactivism, design and autism. It consists of four dimensions of experience - <i>sensory</i>, <i>habitual</i>, <i>social</i>, and <i>affective</i> -, each providing specific pointers on how to better understand how autistic people experience the world and how supportive technologies may complement that experience. By adopting an enactive approach, ALD enables a reframing of supportive technology as helping to sustain different levels of homoeostasis. It offers a novel lens that allows designers to put the lived experiences of autistic individuals at the centre of the design process, with special attention to the role of bodily structures and processing in shaping these experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":46990,"journal":{"name":"CoDesign-International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts","volume":"20 2","pages":"243-265"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11473053/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Radical design praxis and the problematics of intent","authors":"Anaïs Carlton-Parada, Sharon Prendeville","doi":"10.1080/15710882.2023.2269913","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2023.2269913","url":null,"abstract":"This article explores counter-design as a radical meaning-making practice for community co-design. Radicalism, here, is an ongoing process of complicating and unsettling daily practices to reveal and thus acknowledge socio-political context. Semiotic analysis of ethnographic research with grassroots organisations is taken as the point of departure to understand how communities co-design meaning, and in turn how we might co-design new meanings through countering. Through counter-design in place, we observe small semiotic moments that problematise the rhetoric of horizontal democratic organising amongst the realities of coercion and power asymmetries. These semiotic moments are thus significant for how they reveal the reproduction of meaning and how this constructs, and can subsequently limit, the possible actions for these communities. In this sense, our approach constitutes a design praxis, through which we analyse what it means to employ countering against existing institutional power, both for our participants and for ourselves as designers. Here, we reveal the tenuousness of (designer/ly) intent in relation to and in combination with the artifice of readymade community designs, as these are shaped by work ‘on the ground’ and consider how this might impact the co-creation of democratic communities.","PeriodicalId":46990,"journal":{"name":"CoDesign-International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts","volume":"AES-21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135111339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Exploring the future of fashion design education for generation Z through ‘Co-design as community-based participatory research’","authors":"Mee Jekal, Brooke Brandewie, Injoo Kim","doi":"10.1080/15710882.2023.2270498","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2023.2270498","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis research is to explore the future of fashion design education for a new generation, Gen Z. This generation, with unique characteristics, along with digitalisation and globalisation,are causing a paradigm shift in every domain. This research collected data from multiple stakeholders, industry professionals, faculty members, and students in the US. Through mixed methods, we identified three primary research aims. We reviewed opportunities utilising the ‘Co-design as CBPR (Community-Based Participatory Research) framework’, and how fashion design needs to evolve to incorporate a more user-centric, problems-focused approach. Lastly, we suggest pedagogical approaches to support ‘Co-design as CBPR’ for valuable integrated teaching and learning for future fashion design pedagogy.KEYWORDS: Co-designCommunity-Based Participatory Research (CBPR)fashion design education futuresgeneration Z (Gen Z)pedagogy Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":46990,"journal":{"name":"CoDesign-International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts","volume":"70 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135413001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The ‘Other Talk’: a co-design study of board games for cross-generational communication of life-and-death issues","authors":"Yueh-Tuan Li","doi":"10.1080/15710882.2023.2269917","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2023.2269917","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis study presents the collaborative design experience of developing a cross-generational communication game about life-and-death issues. The research activities involved two groups of end-users from different generations, who were tasked with working together to build tools that would encourage a deeper communication between them. To overcome limited knowledge on serious game design and encourage participation, this study utilises an experimental approach that involves a series of workshop activities following a design circle. The results indicate that engagement among cross-generational participants can be enhanced by involving a small, mixed group and utilising structural design materials in the co-design process. The groups developed a collaborative mode of task-oriented and ability-based division of labour to develop the game. This approach also stimulated individuals to take on multiple roles, that is, users, testers, informants, and design partners, and shift between roles as the group dynamic, supporting materials, and design stages evolve. Additionally, this collaborative process encourages participants to reflect on their role as future end-users when communicating sensitive issues to others.KEYWORDS: Co-designserious gamecross-generational communicationlife-and-deathgame design AcknowledgementsGrateful thanks to all those who participated in the workshop activities. The author also thanks the two reviewers and editors for their valuable suggestions, which helped improve the manuscript.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. The Art of Serious Game Design toolkits incorporate four subthemes from the DPE framework into one working board and question cards; this becomes the scaffold for serious game design (Digital Education Strategies Citation2021).Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan, R.O.C. under Grant no. [MOST 108-2410-H-035-035].","PeriodicalId":46990,"journal":{"name":"CoDesign-International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136033366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Co-designing a housing and livelihood toolkit with low-income older people for future housing in Klong Toey, Bangkok, Thailand","authors":"K. Hadjri, I. O. Durosaiye, S. Samra, Y. Niennattrakul, S. Sinuraibhan, S. Sattayakorn, S. Wungpatcharapon, S. Ramasoot","doi":"10.1080/15710882.2023.2268596","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2023.2268596","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to examine the co-design process of a research project which was implemented to support an initiative led by low-income older people in Klong Toey, Bangkok. The primary objective was to co-produce a design toolkit that can guide the development of live–work housing for low-income older people in Klong Toey. A three-day co-design workshop was held with local stakeholders to develop design alternatives for the prevailing live–work activities identified as a part of the field study. Within the framework of co-design methodology, the researchers engaged with the users as facilitators and translators to produce design options that informed the toolkit. The toolkit was developed under the overarching AgeingHood project, inspired by the unique housing and livelihood needs of the older people of Klong Toey, who often run small businesses from their own homes. It was conceived out of the understanding that ageing, housing and livelihood are interrelated aspects of the lives of low-income older people in this area of Bangkok. In addition to the toolkit, the project also led to impacts such as supporting residents’ live–work needs assessment and positive engagement and collaborative working with various local stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":46990,"journal":{"name":"CoDesign-International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136210422","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Co-designing augmented reality: exploring the role of boundary negotiating artifacts","authors":"Leah Scolere, L. H. Malinin, F. R. Ortega","doi":"10.1080/15710882.2023.2255169","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2023.2255169","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThere is a consensus in the literature that interdisciplinarity fosters greater innovation within co-design teams, however, systematic approaches for how experiential knowledge is shared between team members remains underexplored. This study examines the role of artifacts created by a team of interdisciplinary students during the process of co-designing augmented reality (AR) technology for a hybrid interior environment in an academic incubator building. The project emphasises the role of end-users as co-creators across phases of the design process, with collaborative work unexpectedly shifting from in-person to virtual practices due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Artifacts created by team members and in-depth interviews are analysed to examine how experiential knowledge was developed and shared between students from different majors. In addition to the development team data, this study draws on concurrent think-aloud data from other end-users about the AR-application prototype. The findings indicate the role of sharing scene demos, storyboards, and mock-ups as ‘boundary-negotiating artifacts’ which helped team members develop a common language for sharing key aspects of the AR development process. This study suggests a framework for intentional development of boundary-negotiating artifacts based on phases of the co-design process for further technology-based collaboration on interdisciplinary teams.KEYWORDS: Augmented realityco-designboundary-negotiating-artifactsembodimenthybrid environmentsmobile-AR AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank and acknowledge the interdisciplinary team who contributed to this project as well as all the students who participated as part of the CoDT or as end users (EU). We also appreciate the feedback from the reviewers.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Electronic Art is a studio concentration in the BFA degree where students utilise computer software and code to create digital fine art.2. See Scolere and Malinin (Citation2023) for more information about outcome of this project related to the role of AR affordances in hybrid interior environments.3. Digital-physical integration is one criteria defining AR (Azuma Citation1997).4. As facilitators of the process, the authors recognize their roles as part of the participatory and co-design processes.5. This paper includes the interview data from three key members of the CoDT. There were six additional CoDT contributors to the project and artifact development (ID = 1, CS = 5.)6. Concurrent think-aloud (Alhadreti and Mayhew Citation2018; Hanington and Martin Citation2019) is method where end-users describe what they are thinking, feeling, and doing while using the AR-app. The researcher walked alongside the participant to observe real-time experience including reactions and expressions.7. Snowball sampling (Parker, Scott, and Geddes Citation2019) is a recruitment method commonly used in qualitative research where ","PeriodicalId":46990,"journal":{"name":"CoDesign-International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135738842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Convivial aesthetic in social innovation: a nested framework from three projects in Milano","authors":"Ilpo Koskinen, Anna Meroni","doi":"10.1080/15710882.2023.2260803","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2023.2260803","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTSocial structures are increasingly becoming subject matters of design, because considered integral to service design, akin to interfaces, physical elements, and spaces. The paper explores the use of aesthetics to reshape social structures in social innovation. It delves into three social innovation projects in Milan, formulating the concept of ‘convivial aesthetic’, which refers to the design and creation of materials, interactions, social forms, and a sense of community that fosters autonomy, personal interdependence, and positive social change. The analysis of the projects is based on a framework consisting of four elements: material support, social interaction, ordinary social forms, and the sense of community.The latter is a crucial component of convivial aesthetic: by fostering a feeling of belonging and shared purpose, participants become part of a larger social community with collective goals. Designers use symbols, rituals, and events to strengthen this sense of community.The paper acknowledges the limitations of this framework, particularly its focus on smaller communities and the need for further exploration of larger societal structures. However, it highlights the value of convivial aesthetic in shifting the focus of design from physical objects to immaterial interactions and social forms, ultimately promoting positive social transformation.KEYWORDS: Aestheticconvivialityservice designsocial innovationsocial formscommunity Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. https://www.facebook.com/Nutrire-Milano-energie-per-il-cambiamento-186357474712947; https://www.facebook.com/mercatodellaterradimilano.2. The full partnership is organised in two levels: a|cube (coordinator), Politecnico di Milano – Polimi DESIS Lab, Spazio Aperto Servizi, Fondazione Politecnico di Milano, Kilowatt mainly active on advanced training and experimentation; and Avanzi, Comunità del Giambellino, Dynamoscopio, Gruppo Cooperativo Cgm, PerMicro, active on the project start-up phase for scouting and community engagement.3. See https://lascuoladeiquartieri.it/; https://www.facebook.com/lascuoladeiquartieri; and https://www.instagram.com/lascuoladeiquartieri/.","PeriodicalId":46990,"journal":{"name":"CoDesign-International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136235225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A systematic literature review on co-design education and preparing future designers for their role in co-design","authors":"Melis Örnekoğlu-Selçuk, M. Emmanouil, D. Hasırcı, M. Grizioti, L. Van Langenhove","doi":"10.1080/15710882.2023.2242840","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2023.2242840","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46990,"journal":{"name":"CoDesign-International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72919803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Accessibility and participatory design: time, power, and facilitation","authors":"Lindsay Stephens, Hilda Smith, I. Epstein, Melanie Baljko, Ian Mcintosh, N. Dadashi, Devika Narayani Prakash","doi":"10.1080/15710882.2023.2214145","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2023.2214145","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper documents the goals, techniques, and outcomes of nine interventions designed to improve the accessibility of a design charette (DC). These interventions focused on Time, Power, and Facilitation and were developed based on critiques found in design literature, critical disability scholarship, and the lived expertise of disabled people. Data was collected through recording activities and outputs, recorded observations, and elicited feedback. We found that adjusting time, which is essential for access, was difficult and required trade-offs. We also suggest that the presence of a ‘vibes watch’ facilitation role to monitor participation frequency, emotional tone, and power dynamics can be useful to address uneven power relations, caucusing can also be valuable but should be used at specific moments. Non-neutral facilitation, anti-oppression training, and regular reflection can help facilitation/design teams identify and address exclusionary practices. Technology can aid but also constrain access. Finally, despite all interventions, access remains a site of friction and political choices. Stakeholders continue to participate in different and not always equally valued ways, so secondary analysis is useful for understanding charette products or outputs.","PeriodicalId":46990,"journal":{"name":"CoDesign-International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74582812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Participatory design meets gender equality at European higher education institutions","authors":"N. Iivari, Erkki Tervo, Marjukka Käsmä, M. Heikkinen","doi":"10.1080/15710882.2023.2215742","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2023.2215742","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Gender equality is among the sustainable development goals expected of higher education institutions (HEIs). This paper will explore the potential and implications of participatory design (PD) in the context of gender equality work in HEIs. We study the topic within a multinational, multidisciplinary consortium, which is working for gender equality in HEIs, using PD as a tool and inspiration. We identify a variety of local conditions shaping PD and gender equality work, divergent discourses on gender equality work, and several sources of friction regarding PD and gender equality work. We conceptualise PD for gender equality work as being highly contested and emergent, with multiple forces shaping its trajectory. PD needs to be sensitive towards local circumstances at the national and organisational level, both politically and ideologically. It needs to navigate within national and international politics and policies and consider different timescales beyond specific projects. It also needs to acknowledge that PD for gender equality entails design, discourse, and friction.","PeriodicalId":46990,"journal":{"name":"CoDesign-International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91023064","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}