Political Studies Review最新文献_第3页

Commissioned Book Review: Nick Whittaker, Geopolitics and Identity in British Foreign Policy Discourse. The Island Race 特约书评：Nick Whittaker，《英国外交政策话语中的地缘政治与身份认同》。岛屿竞赛

IF 1.9 3区社会学

Political Studies Review Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI: 10.1177/14789299241252387

Judith Koch

引用次数: 0

The European Union-Intersectionality Framework: Unpacking Intersectionality in the ‘Union of Equality’ Agenda 欧洲联盟-交叉性框架：解读 "平等联盟 "议程中的交叉性

IF 1.9 3区社会学

Political Studies Review Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI: 10.1177/14789299241242343

P. Debusscher, Eva Luna Maes

{"title":"The European Union-Intersectionality Framework: Unpacking Intersectionality in the ‘Union of Equality’ Agenda","authors":"P. Debusscher, Eva Luna Maes","doi":"10.1177/14789299241242343","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299241242343","url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the concept of intersectionality has gained significant prominence in the policy discourse of the European Union (EU). However, several scholars have noted a lack of engagement with intersectionality’s core social justice principles and stressed the need to carefully examine how intersectionality is taken up in EU policy. To contribute to this effort, the authors propose a new ‘EU-Intersectionality’ framework to analyse intersectionality in EU policy, combining elements of Critical Frame Analysis and identifying eight core criteria to operationalize intersectionality in EU policy texts and leverage its politically emancipatory potential. The resulting framework sheds light on how intersectionality has fared within EU policy contexts. Specifically, it asks which dimensions of intersectionality are captured, and which elements are left behind. We illustrate the framework by analysing the EU’s ‘Union of Equality’ strategies on anti-racism; gender equality; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer equality; Roma equality and the rights of persons with disabilities. We conclude that the EU-Intersectionality framework allows to dissect the varied and conflicting ways in which intersectionality is operationalized within EU policies – while some aspects of the ‘Union of Equality’ agenda resonate with the social justice aims behind the concept, the use of intersectionality remains superficial and largely maintains the status quo. Our findings caution against the co-optation of intersectionality in EU policymaking, while recognising the progressive advancements made within the EU equality policy area.","PeriodicalId":46813,"journal":{"name":"Political Studies Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140656718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Braking and Exiting: Referendum Games, European Integration and the Road to the UK’s Brexit Vote 刹车与退出：公投游戏、欧洲一体化和英国脱欧投票之路

IF 1.9 3区社会学

Political Studies Review Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI: 10.1177/14789299241239002

Joseph Ganderson, Anna Kyriazi

{"title":"Braking and Exiting: Referendum Games, European Integration and the Road to the UK’s Brexit Vote","authors":"Joseph Ganderson, Anna Kyriazi","doi":"10.1177/14789299241239002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299241239002","url":null,"abstract":"The UK’s in-out referendum on European Union membership is often attributed to an incompatibility inherent in the UK–EU relationship, or else a rising tide of Euroscepticism forcing a reckoning. We argue that the referendum should be understood as the culmination of parliamentary ‘referendum games’ in the preceding years, whereby backbenchers periodically applied pressure to office-seeking leaders who strategically defused this by promising public votes. These games were episodic and escalatory, coinciding with integrative European treaties which activated transient Eurosceptic backlashes. While referendum avoidance was personally rational, leaders’ repeated parlays created a standalone referendum politics, ratcheting up the intensity of backbench demands based on past promises and democratic renewal. After the Lisbon Treaty, a tipping point was reached, transforming calls for a ‘brake’ on integration to demand for binary ‘exit’ vote at the next treaty moment. This accompanied the Euro-area crisis in 2011, effectively ending David Cameron’s discretion to continue the game. To show this, we plot all mentions of EU-related referendums and adjacent terms in the House of Commons between 2000 and 2015. We descriptively identify five peak salience flares around EU treaty moments and then analyse 263 interventions by Members of Parliament to show how referendum pressure ratcheted up over time.","PeriodicalId":46813,"journal":{"name":"Political Studies Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140692628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Does Party Identification Matter for Deliberation? Evidence from the Poland Speaks Experiment 政党认同对审议重要吗？来自 "波兰之声 "实验的证据

IF 1.9 3区社会学

Political Studies Review Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI: 10.1177/14789299241245609

Ramon van der Does, Honorata Mazepus

{"title":"Does Party Identification Matter for Deliberation? Evidence from the Poland Speaks Experiment","authors":"Ramon van der Does, Honorata Mazepus","doi":"10.1177/14789299241245609","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299241245609","url":null,"abstract":"Deliberation among the public appears wanting, even in many of the world’s established democracies. This apparent lack of mutually respectful conversation among citizens about politics involving a give-and-take of reasons is often ascribed to growing affective polarisation. The more the citizens come to think of each other as belonging to opposing groups, the less likely it allegedly becomes that they will show respect towards each other or exchange arguments while talking politics. However, the empirical support for this common supposition remains tentative, as prior research suffers from potential endogeneity problems and selection bias. To address these limitations, we introduce a novel experimental design involving an imagined conversation on refugee policy in Poland. Our experimental test shows that, on average, participants’ inclination to deliberate did not significantly differ based on whether they imagined talking to someone from an ingroup or to someone from an outgroup instead. Our findings thereby suggest that the relationship between group identification and public deliberation might not be as straightforward as is often assumed. At least in some contexts, a lack of mutual group identification does not spell disaster for deliberation.","PeriodicalId":46813,"journal":{"name":"Political Studies Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140702790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Social Choice and Citizen Participation: Bringing Democratic Theory to Public Administration 社会选择与公民参与：将民主理论引入公共行政

IF 1.9 3区社会学

Political Studies Review Pub Date : 2024-04-06 DOI: 10.1177/14789299231203657

R. Dacombe, Marta Wojciechowska

引用次数: 0

The Populist Name Game: About Populism and Naming 民粹主义的命名游戏关于民粹主义和命名

IF 1.9 3区社会学

Political Studies Review Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI: 10.1177/14789299241242259

Uri Kidron, Piki Ish-Shalom

引用次数: 0

Fostering Reasoning in the Politically Disengaged: The Role of Deliberative Minipublics 培养脱离政治的人的推理能力：慎思式小型公共机构的作用