{"title":"The interaction between individual traits and societal factors in predicting abortion stigma","authors":"Iraklis Grigoropoulos, Demos Michael","doi":"10.1111/asap.70038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.70038","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Abortion stigma is a morally and politically divisive issue, often framed through reductive binaries that equate support for abortion with empathy and opposition with moral deficiency. This study explores how prosocial personality traits (i.e., the Light Triad), religiosity, and political ideology interact in shaping stigmatizing attitudes toward abortion. A sample of 304 participants engaged in a survey from October to November 2024, completed measures assessing abortion stigma, Light Triad traits, religiosity, and political orientation. Structural equation modeling revealed that higher Light Triad traits predicted lower abortion stigma. However, this relationship was moderated by political ideology: among conservatives, prosocial traits had a diminished—or even reversed—association with stigma. These findings challenge the notion that moral reasoning on abortion is unidimensional and highlight the role of ideological context in directing moral concern. The study underscores the need for stigma-reduction strategies that consider not only individual empathy but also group norms and ideological commitments that shape how that empathy is expressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/asap.70038","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145224030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Cultural violence in news coverage of the George Floyd murder: Exploring media depictions of police brutality toward Black-Americans","authors":"Jada Cheek, Courtney M. Bonam, Regina D. Langhout","doi":"10.1111/asap.70036","DOIUrl":"10.1111/asap.70036","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The 2020 killing of George Floyd by officer Derek Chauvin sparked one of the largest protest movements in the United States. Chauvin was ultimately convicted of murder—a rare but necessary step to police officer accountability for wrongdoing. The media play an important role in framing the public's attitudes surrounding high-profile cases involving police killings of unarmed civilians. The current study investigates media narratives surrounding the Floyd case for evidence of cultural violence, which occurs when direct, physical violence becomes institutionalized, accepted as normative, and legitimized. We looked for evidence of cultural violence across 300 articles from three U.S. newspapers (i.e., New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and The Star Tribune). We coded for cultural violence themes, which we operationalized as the seven mechanisms of moral disengagement, that is, the process of convincing oneself that ethical standards do not apply. Cultural violence was prevalent across all news outlets (i.e., it occurred in 88.9% of articles in the overall sample). These findings have implications for how media framing influences attitudes surrounding high-profile police brutality cases involving Black victims, and psychological theory related to violence, morality, and racism.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/asap.70036","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145111412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Living in fear: The psychological impact of the threat of sexual violence on women in India","authors":"Afreen Waseem, Naila Firdous, Shah Alam","doi":"10.1111/asap.70037","DOIUrl":"10.1111/asap.70037","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In today's society, women are increasingly vulnerable to sexual violence, whether at home, in the workplace, or in public spaces. This study aims to explore how the perceived threat of sexual violence affects the psychological well-being and daily behavior of women aged 20–30 in northern India, with a focus on fear, stress, and anxiety. A qualitative approach was employed, using semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 20 women. Data were collected through text-based online interviews, and thematic analysis was performed to identify key patterns and insights related to the psychological impact of sexual violence. Based on Trauma Theory, Cognitive Processing Theory, and feminist perspectives, the findings revealed that the fear of sexual violence led to heightened stress and anxiety, significantly affecting participants' mental well-being. Many women reported behavioral changes such as avoiding certain locations and altering daily routines to stay safe. The study highlighted the role of societal norms and family pressures in shaping how women deal with these threats. This study also underscores the urgent need for mental health support for women coping with the psychological toll of sexual violence.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/asap.70037","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145111125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Partisan identity, ideological orientations, and the differential criticisms of ingroup and outgroup leadership: An examination of the 2024 U.S. election","authors":"Joseph A. Wagoner, Yani Yakob","doi":"10.1111/asap.70033","DOIUrl":"10.1111/asap.70033","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Do partisans ever oppose their candidates during U.S. presidential elections? We explored this question across two studies (<i>N</i> = 1106) using U.S. Republicans and Democrats in the context of the 2024 Presidential Election. We propose that partisan identity and ideological orientations related to different criticisms of in-group and out-group leaders, which differently relates to level of candidate support. For Democrats, we focused on the ideological orientation of left-wing authoritarianism (LWA). For Republicans, we focused on the ideological belief in democracy. Study 1 measured participants criticisms of in-group and out-group candidates, while Study 2 manipulated the salience of in-group (or out-group) leadership support. Across both studies, stronger partisan identity related to lower levels of in-group criticism, higher levels of out-group criticism, and more leadership support. Importantly, the examined ideological orientation lead Democrats (but not Republicans) to oppose their in-group leader. Manipulating the salience of leadership support did not impact these relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145101801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Facial characteristics and electoral success: Evidence from the Czech Senate elections","authors":"Vojtěch Kotrba, Lucie Hnídková","doi":"10.1111/asap.70035","DOIUrl":"10.1111/asap.70035","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines the impact of physical characteristics, specifically facial symmetry and facial width-to-height ratio, on the electoral success of political candidates (<i>N</i> = 167) in the 2022 Czech Senate elections. These facial metrics are used as objective indicators of facial structure, offering a novel approach in the political context. Candidate data were analyzed using Poisson regression models, revealing significant associations between facial features and electoral outcomes. Higher facial symmetry was consistently linked to better electoral performance, while the effect of fWHR varied by gender, being positive for men and negative for women. These results highlight the broader implications of physical appearance in politics, suggesting that voter biases towards attractive candidates can influence election outcomes. This study contributes to the understanding of non-political factors in electoral success.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/asap.70035","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145101694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Angel D. Armenta, Demitri Aguilar, Kevin McAweeney, Hannah Volpert-Esmond, Michael A. Zárate
{"title":"National prostalgia is associated with decreases in ingroup protection, outgroup derogation, and support for Donald Trump's presidency","authors":"Angel D. Armenta, Demitri Aguilar, Kevin McAweeney, Hannah Volpert-Esmond, Michael A. Zárate","doi":"10.1111/asap.70034","DOIUrl":"10.1111/asap.70034","url":null,"abstract":"<p>National nostalgia is a mechanism through which intergroup hostility is catalyzed. In contrast, national prostalgia has been shown to benefit individuals due to its optimistic and motivational functions. Collective forms of future-oriented thinking, such as national prostalgia, predict increases in support for agents of change in society. Few studies, though, have investigated how future-oriented variables are linked to prejudice or support for political candidates. Thus, we investigated how national nostalgia and prostalgia may predict prejudice (Study 1, <i>N</i> = 177) and support for Donald Trump and Joe Biden (Study 2, <i>N</i> = 110). As hypothesized, national nostalgia and prostalgia respectively predicted increases and decreases in ingroup protection, outgroup derogation, and support for Donald Trump. Neither national nostalgia nor prostalgia predicted support for Joe Biden. In Study 1, there was a suppression effect, such that national prostalgia was only a significant predictor of intergroup attitudes when national nostalgia was a predictor in the models. These findings were not a result of individual optimism, political conservatism, gender, age, or associating Trump with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. These results highlight that national prostalgia and nostalgia are distinct psychological phenomena associated with unique consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145021884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Populist attitudes of Democrats and Republicans are differentially affected by changes in electoral fairness and democratic satisfaction","authors":"Joseph D. Foley, Paul J. Maher, Orla T. Muldoon","doi":"10.1111/asap.70032","DOIUrl":"10.1111/asap.70032","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Populism has long accompanied the development of modern democracies like a shadow, reflecting the presence of institutional faults. Given populism's discursive targeting of elites, it is particularly attractive to those who feel unfairly treated by the current state of affairs. In this paper, we explore how these populist grievances change in reaction to electoral events. Specifically, we assess perceptions of fairness and apply them to an electoral context. To accomplish this, we conducted a longitudinal study of three time-points throughout the 2024 US presidential election (<i>n </i>= 540), two before and one after the election. We hypothesized that changes in perceptions of electoral fairness, particularly among partisans whose candidate lost, would meaningfully affect an individual's populist attitudes post-election. Using mediation analyses, we found that decreases in both electoral fairness evaluations and democratic satisfaction mediated an increase in populist attitudes only among Democrats, while serial mediation revealed a causal link between electoral fairness and democratic satisfaction. Although democratic satisfaction may represent a broader attitude towards electoral systems, perceptions of unfairness within the electoral process also have the potential to stoke populist sentiment. We discuss the mechanics of this effect and other procedural contexts which may be of further interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/asap.70032","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145007907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"AI as moral cover: How algorithmic bias exploits psychological mechanisms to perpetuate social inequality","authors":"Islam Borinca","doi":"10.1111/asap.70031","DOIUrl":"10.1111/asap.70031","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Algorithmic decision-making systems are increasingly shaping critical social outcomes (e.g., hiring, lending, criminal justice, healthcare), yet technical approaches to bias mitigation ignore crucial psychological mechanisms that enable discriminatory use. To address this gap, I integrate motivated reasoning, system justification, and moral disengagement theories to argue that AI systems may function as “moral cover,” allowing users to perpetuate inequality while maintaining beliefs in their own objectivity. Users often demonstrate “selective adherence,” following algorithmic advice when it confirms stereotypes while dismissing counter-stereotypical outputs. System justification motives lead people to defend discriminatory algorithmic outcomes as legitimate, “data-driven” decisions. Moral disengagement mechanisms (including responsibility displacement, euphemistic labeling, and advantageous comparison) can enable discrimination while preserving moral self-regard. Finally, I argue that understanding AI bias as fundamentally psychological rather than merely technical demands interventions addressing these underlying psychological processes alongside algorithmic improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/asap.70031","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145007908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Functions of post-disaster collective action: An ethnographic perspective on the silent walk commemorating the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes","authors":"Dr Selin Tekin","doi":"10.1111/asap.70026","DOIUrl":"10.1111/asap.70026","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines the functions of collective action for people who experienced a disaster. Data were collected through ethnography and individual interviews with 22 people who participated in a silent walk, an anniversary event for the earthquake that occurred on February 6, 2023. The thematic analysis of the interviews and field reports identified the functions at three levels: First, at the individual level by contributing to people's psychological well-being positively and giving people a sense of efficacy; second, at the community level by giving people a sense of shared identity with others; third, at the policy level by giving people a space to express their discontent with various political agendas. The findings emphasize the necessity of policy-level change to ensure the sustainability of these transformations. The study highlights that collective action organized by people from the public can be a significant step toward raising awareness of the need for policy change.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144999000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tristan G. Martin, Harrison J. Schmitt, Tyler Jimenez
{"title":"How do neoliberals vote? Power-based asymmetries in hierarchy-enhancement","authors":"Tristan G. Martin, Harrison J. Schmitt, Tyler Jimenez","doi":"10.1111/asap.70029","DOIUrl":"10.1111/asap.70029","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Neoliberal ideology has received increasing empirical attention in recent years, although little is known about its relationship to voting behavior. Examining this question may offer insight into theoretical questions regarding social hierarchies and neoliberalism. Following from social dominance theory, we posit that social dominance orientation should predict neoliberal ideology, which should, in turn, predict voting for a Republican candidate. However, building from the ideological asymmetry hypothesis, we posit that these relationships should be stronger among high (vs. low) power groups. One study (<i>N</i> = 604) is designed to test these hypothesized relationships between social dominance orientation, neoliberal ideology, and voting intentions among high- and low-power groups using a series of moderated-mediation models in the context of the 2024 US Presidential election. A nationally representative sample (based on race, gender, age, and political affiliation) of registered voters was recruited from Prolific to complete a brief survey in the weeks leading up to the election.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144927671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}