“I know what's best for my child”: A qualitative analysis of US cisgender-heterosexual and LGBTQ parents’ perspectives on inclusive education policies

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Flora Oswald, Izilda Pereira-Jorge, Alexandra Garr-Schultz, Kimberly E. Chaney
{"title":"“I know what's best for my child”: A qualitative analysis of US cisgender-heterosexual and LGBTQ parents’ perspectives on inclusive education policies","authors":"Flora Oswald,&nbsp;Izilda Pereira-Jorge,&nbsp;Alexandra Garr-Schultz,&nbsp;Kimberly E. Chaney","doi":"10.1111/asap.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Diversity education in the K-12 years is a contentious issue in the contemporary US context. Given evidence that parental identity influences beliefs about and support for diversity education, we qualitatively explored cisgender-heterosexual and LGBTQ+ parents’ (<i>N</i> = 609) beliefs about the appropriateness of inclusive educational policies in K-12 classrooms. We collected qualitative data on parental perceptions of inclusive signals in classrooms (e.g., displaying a rainbow flag) and on perceptions of inclusive curriculum (whether children should learn about diversity at school/from teachers or at home/from parents). Parents’ responses reflected variability in support for inclusive signals. Cisgender-heterosexual parents were more likely to endorse that cues should not be allowed and were less likely to indicate holistic support of cues compared to LGBTQ+ parents. For inclusive curriculum, cisgender-heterosexual parents were more likely than LGBTQ+ parents to endorse that diversity information should be discussed only at home with parents. We contextualize parents’ responses within contemporary political rhetoric (e.g., discussions of Parents’ Bills of Rights) and highlight implications for educators and policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"25 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/asap.70012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asap.70012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diversity education in the K-12 years is a contentious issue in the contemporary US context. Given evidence that parental identity influences beliefs about and support for diversity education, we qualitatively explored cisgender-heterosexual and LGBTQ+ parents’ (N = 609) beliefs about the appropriateness of inclusive educational policies in K-12 classrooms. We collected qualitative data on parental perceptions of inclusive signals in classrooms (e.g., displaying a rainbow flag) and on perceptions of inclusive curriculum (whether children should learn about diversity at school/from teachers or at home/from parents). Parents’ responses reflected variability in support for inclusive signals. Cisgender-heterosexual parents were more likely to endorse that cues should not be allowed and were less likely to indicate holistic support of cues compared to LGBTQ+ parents. For inclusive curriculum, cisgender-heterosexual parents were more likely than LGBTQ+ parents to endorse that diversity information should be discussed only at home with parents. We contextualize parents’ responses within contemporary political rhetoric (e.g., discussions of Parents’ Bills of Rights) and highlight implications for educators and policymakers.

“我知道什么对我的孩子最好”:美国异性恋、异性恋和LGBTQ父母对全纳教育政策看法的定性分析
在当代美国,K-12年级的多元化教育是一个有争议的问题。鉴于有证据表明父母身份会影响对多样性教育的信念和支持,我们定性地探讨了顺性、异性恋和LGBTQ+父母(N = 609)对K-12课堂包容性教育政策适当性的信念。我们收集了关于家长对教室包容性信号的看法(例如,展示彩虹旗)和对包容性课程的看法(孩子是否应该在学校/老师那里学习多样性,还是在家里/父母那里学习)的定性数据。家长的反应反映了支持包容性信号的差异。与LGBTQ+父母相比,顺性异性恋父母更有可能赞同不应该允许暗示,并且不太可能表示对暗示的整体支持。在包容性课程方面,与LGBTQ+家长相比,异性恋父母更有可能支持多元化信息只应该在家里与父母讨论。我们将父母的回应置于当代政治修辞(例如,对父母权利法案的讨论)的背景下,并强调对教育工作者和政策制定者的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Recent articles in ASAP have examined social psychological methods in the study of economic and social justice including ageism, heterosexism, racism, sexism, status quo bias and other forms of discrimination, social problems such as climate change, extremism, homelessness, inter-group conflict, natural disasters, poverty, and terrorism, and social ideals such as democracy, empowerment, equality, health, and trust.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信