When sex goes to school: Parents’ conservative opposition to sexuality education

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Iraklis Grigoropoulos
{"title":"When sex goes to school: Parents’ conservative opposition to sexuality education","authors":"Iraklis Grigoropoulos","doi":"10.1111/asap.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding the social-psychological mechanisms underlying parental attitudes toward school-based sexuality education is increasingly important in polarized societies. Guided by the Dual Process Motivational (DPM) model, the current research examined how right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), social dominance orientation (SDO), and religiosity relate to opposition to school-based sexuality education among Greek parents. Two studies were conducted with a combined sample of 643 parents (Study 1, 376 participants, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 38.47, SD<sub>age</sub> = 7.39; 336 female participants; Study 2, 267 participants, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 44.91, SD<sub>age</sub> = 6.77; 240 female respondents) residing in Greece. Data were analyzed using bivariate correlations, multiple regression, and bootstrapped moderation analysis. Results showed that both RWA and SDO were negatively associated with support for school-based sexuality education. Furthermore, higher religiosity intensified the negative relationship between RWA and attitudes toward sexuality education. These findings highlight how ideological and religious worldviews may shape parental opposition to sexuality education, offering new directions for research and policy development.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"25 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/asap.70014","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asap.70014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the social-psychological mechanisms underlying parental attitudes toward school-based sexuality education is increasingly important in polarized societies. Guided by the Dual Process Motivational (DPM) model, the current research examined how right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), social dominance orientation (SDO), and religiosity relate to opposition to school-based sexuality education among Greek parents. Two studies were conducted with a combined sample of 643 parents (Study 1, 376 participants, Mage = 38.47, SDage = 7.39; 336 female participants; Study 2, 267 participants, Mage = 44.91, SDage = 6.77; 240 female respondents) residing in Greece. Data were analyzed using bivariate correlations, multiple regression, and bootstrapped moderation analysis. Results showed that both RWA and SDO were negatively associated with support for school-based sexuality education. Furthermore, higher religiosity intensified the negative relationship between RWA and attitudes toward sexuality education. These findings highlight how ideological and religious worldviews may shape parental opposition to sexuality education, offering new directions for research and policy development.

Abstract Image

当性进入学校:父母对性教育的保守反对
在两极分化的社会中,了解家长对学校性教育态度背后的社会心理机制变得越来越重要。在双过程动机(DPM)模型的指导下,目前的研究考察了右翼威权主义(RWA)、社会支配取向(SDO)和宗教信仰如何与希腊父母反对基于学校的性教育有关。两项研究共纳入643名家长(研究1,376名参与者,Mage = 38.47, SDage = 7.39;女性参与者336人;研究2,267名受试者,Mage = 44.91, SDage = 6.77;240名女性受访者)居住在希腊。数据分析采用双变量相关性、多元回归和自举调节分析。结果显示,RWA和SDO与校本性教育的支持度呈负相关。此外,较高的宗教虔诚度强化了RWA与性教育态度之间的负向关系。这些发现强调了意识形态和宗教世界观如何影响父母对性教育的反对,为研究和政策制定提供了新的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Recent articles in ASAP have examined social psychological methods in the study of economic and social justice including ageism, heterosexism, racism, sexism, status quo bias and other forms of discrimination, social problems such as climate change, extremism, homelessness, inter-group conflict, natural disasters, poverty, and terrorism, and social ideals such as democracy, empowerment, equality, health, and trust.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信