{"title":"‘Somewhere We Can Call Home and…Be Normal’: Findings From the Justice Housing Programme Evaluation","authors":"Helen Taylor, Lorana Bartels","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.70025","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajs4.70025","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The relationship between homelessness or unstable housing and reincarceration is well documented. The initial month after a person is released from custody is a period of particular vulnerability, with an increased risk of homelessness and return to prison. The Justice Housing Programme (JHP) is a programme developed by the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) Government to provide transitional accommodation to adults leaving the ACT's prison. This paper presents key findings from a process evaluation of the JHP, drawing on interviews with 19 current and former JHP clients and 16 professional stakeholders involved in the programme, as well as a brief survey with 17 current and former clients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"61 1","pages":"222-232"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.70025","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147585234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gene Mercer, Hugh Hunkin, Florencia Figueroa, Andrew Day, Rhiannon M. Pilkington, Catia G. Malvaso
{"title":"Popular but Poorly Defined: A Scoping Review of Youth Diversion Schemes","authors":"Gene Mercer, Hugh Hunkin, Florencia Figueroa, Andrew Day, Rhiannon M. Pilkington, Catia G. Malvaso","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.70084","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajs4.70084","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This scoping review describes youth diversion schemes, with a key focus on how diversion is defined, implemented, and evaluated. We provide a narrative synthesis of 68 studies and examine key components of each diversion scheme, including: eligibility and exclusion criteria, timing of diversion, the mechanism of intervention, outcome measures and key findings. We identify which schemes appear most promising, while highlighting methodological limitations and gaps in the evidence base. Our analysis revealed that although diversion is widely endorsed as a way to reduce recidivism and to avoid the harmful effects of justice system contact, substantial variation still exists in how the concept is applied. Schemes differ not only in timing and intensity but also in their underlying aims—ranging from minimising justice system contact to addressing offending behaviour through to the provision of intensive interventions. This definitional ambiguity hinders evaluation and policy development. We recommend improvement across four key areas: (1) clarifying how diversion is defined and operationalised; (2) reconsidering the restrictiveness of eligibility criteria; (3) broadening outcome measures beyond recidivism; and (4) analysing program effects by diversion type and timing. Without greater consistency and transparency, it remains difficult for decision-makers to identify and invest in effective diversion approaches.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"61 1","pages":"114-126"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147585123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Luke Butcher, Andrew Day, Catia Malvaso, Jennifer Galouzis, Reece Hinchcliff
{"title":"A National Approach to Safety and Quality in Australian Youth Justice: Lessons From Healthcare","authors":"Luke Butcher, Andrew Day, Catia Malvaso, Jennifer Galouzis, Reece Hinchcliff","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.70079","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajs4.70079","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The safety and quality of youth justice services across Australia have for some years now been the subject of concern, with numerous recommendations put forward to strengthen service delivery. However, there remains no accepted mechanism to assess the quality of services, with current approaches relying on risk elimination and containment strategies—often after an adverse incident has taken place. We contrast this with contemporary approaches to patient safety in healthcare which are more proactive and framed around the development of a culture in which quality is maintained, concluding that the reform of youth justice services in Australia could proceed at a faster rate if nationally consistent, coordinated and mutually accepted approaches to quality governance were to be applied.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"61 1","pages":"139-149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147585139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
John Guenther, Catherine Holmes, Majon Williamson‐Kefu
{"title":"Principles of Successful Digital Inclusion Initiatives in Remote Australia","authors":"John Guenther, Catherine Holmes, Majon Williamson‐Kefu","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.70064","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.70064","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Digital inclusion remains elusive for many people living in remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities of Australia. People in many communities experience limited access, high cost, and often struggle with digital literacies. The policy environment increasingly assumes that government and financial services are universally accessible. The Australian Government has initiated several digital inclusion strategies. However, remote communities are marginalised by rapidly changing technologies and systems that are increasingly complex to navigate. To understand these complexities, we use spatial justice theory as a lens for a discussion of these strategies and our own empirical data. We suggest six principles that can underpin successful digital inclusion initiatives and strategies, designed for and delivered in remote communities. These emerge from an evaluation of a programme called inDigiMOB, managed by First Nations Media Australia. Interviews with 31 digital inclusion stakeholders discussed opportunities and challenges for future initiatives. Principles underpinning success are: place‐based community hubs, the need to address digital inclusion issues, prioritisation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander languages and cultures, affordable and reliable technology access, digital skills, and cyber safety. While the evaluation had inDigiMOB in mind, these principles can be more broadly applied to support strategies designed to address spatial injustices.","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147899416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vincent Y. F. He, Bernard Leckning, Tamika Williams, Gary Robinson, Steven Guthridge
{"title":"Patterns of Multisystem Involvement in Adolescence: Implications for Health, Education and Social Services in the Northern Territory of Australia","authors":"Vincent Y. F. He, Bernard Leckning, Tamika Williams, Gary Robinson, Steven Guthridge","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.70053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.70053","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dual-system young people who crossover between child protection and youth justice systems experience a range of health and educational issues. However, very little research has examined the health and education needs of these young people, especially in Indigenous populations. A retrospective cohort study was established using individual-level linked records to examine the child protection, youth justice, health, and education (multisystem) involvement of young Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people in the Northern Territory (NT) of Australia. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify different groups within the study cohort of 2584 young people with shared patterns and levels of health, education, and social service system involvement from 10 to 17 years of age, inclusive. Three groups of young people were identified, with patterns of higher, more intensive levels of multisystem involvement being associated with a descending social gradient and increasing proportion of health and social service use across the population. A culturally responsive, trauma-informed approach to multiagency collaboration is needed to better support the most vulnerable young people in the NT based on shared priorities targeting educational engagement, strengthening families, and unmet mental health needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"60 3","pages":"852-865"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.70053","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145038010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Fernando Lima, Melissa O'Donnell, Alison J. Gibberd, Kathleen Falster, Emily Banks, Jocelyn Jones, Robyn Williams, Francine Eades, Benjamin Harrap, Richard Chenhall, Olivia Octoman, Sandra Eades
{"title":"The Physical and Mental Health of Mothers of Aboriginal Children in Out-of-Home Care in Western Australia","authors":"Fernando Lima, Melissa O'Donnell, Alison J. Gibberd, Kathleen Falster, Emily Banks, Jocelyn Jones, Robyn Williams, Francine Eades, Benjamin Harrap, Richard Chenhall, Olivia Octoman, Sandra Eades","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.70048","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.70048","url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is a need to better understand the physical and mental health of mothers of Aboriginal children who enter out-of-home care to prevent removals. Evidence suggests that families involved in child protection systems often experience significant needs that may culminate in child removals. For Aboriginal families, these are compounded by the inter-generational trauma from colonisation which has resulted in health issues, poverty and family violence. This is a retrospective cohort study, using linked administrative data, involving all (17,060) mothers of Aboriginal children born in Western Australia between 2000 and 2013. The health outcomes of mothers whose child was placed in care (8%) were compared to those of mothers whose child was notified to child protection authorities (30%) or had no child protection involvement (62%). A higher proportion of mothers of children in care had mental health diagnoses, hospitalisations related to alcohol/drug issues and assault prior to child removal, compared to mothers of children never in care. Mothers of children in care experienced multiple health issues, including 27% experiencing three or more conditions within 5 years prior to child removal. There is an urgent need to provide appropriate support to these mothers, and for coordination and integration of service provision to address their needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"60 3","pages":"812-823"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.70048","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145037863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Philip Mendes, Lynne McPherson, Jemma Venables, Steven Roche, Jenna Bollinger
{"title":"AJSI Transitions From Out-Of-Home Care Special Issue Editorial by Philip Mendes, Lynne McPherson, Jemma Venables, Steven Roche and Jenna Bollinger","authors":"Philip Mendes, Lynne McPherson, Jemma Venables, Steven Roche, Jenna Bollinger","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.70051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.70051","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"60 3","pages":"676-678"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145037862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Deaths of Children in Out-of-Home-Care: What do Inquest Reports Reveal About the Framing of Child Protection Practice?","authors":"Celine Harrison, Maria Harries, Mark Liddiard","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.70050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.70050","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In Western Australia (WA), a coronial inquest into the death of a child who had been in care is mandatory. An inquest is a public hearing, a fact-finding process to determine the cause of the death, prevent future deaths from occurring in similar circumstances and to comment on the public health implications. With these functions in mind, an analysis of the inquest reports regarding the deaths of children aged 13–18 years who were in care was undertaken. The aims were to make visible the representations and frames that describe child protection practice in relation to these children who were in out of home care, the complex problems faced by their families and the care and support provided to them by the child welfare system. We identified three frames: blame featuring individual responsibility and parental deficits, disengagement and service delivery failure as a missed opportunity. We conclude that what is needed in coronial inquests is a fuller representation of broader systemic issues that are inevitably consequential for child and family well-being. Highlighting social and structural inequalities, trauma, discrimination and racism could arguably maximise the potential for coronial findings to reflect the need for supportive practice and a more preventative approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"60 3","pages":"902-911"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.70050","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145037913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“They Know What's Best for the Poor Little Black Fellows, Like They Did All Them Years Ago”: Continued Paternalism and Pressure to Place in the Australian Child Protection System","authors":"James Beaufils, Tatiana Corrales, Aunty Deb Swan","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.70035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.70035","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Child protection systems in Australia have been criticised for racialized policies that result in the over-policing of First Nations families and the removal of First Nations children. Under current colonial structures, “protection from harm” is used to justify the removal of First Nations children from community—sometimes permanently—at the expense of culture under the justification of timely decision making to achieve “permanency.” This is inconsistent with First Nations worldviews and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. It also contributes to the sustained and increasing over-representation of First Nations children in child protection and Out-of-Home Care (OOHC) systems in all Australian states and territories. Drawing on interviews with 32 First Nations and 5 non-indigenous people in the state of New South Wales, Australia, this paper explores participants' perceptions of the purpose of placements in statutory OOHC for First Nations children. The findings highlight issues at the systemic, policy and practice levels that result in permanency being equated with disconnection from family and culture, at the expense of restoration. A lack of consultation with community and an inability to participate in decision-making has led to the continuation of colonial policies that prioritise safety through removal and disconnection. We discuss how these policy changes neglect community advice, and entrench the view that “permanency” is best achieved via permanent care away from family and community. We conclude by discussing the importance of genuine self-determination for the wellbeing of First Nations children, families, and culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"60 3","pages":"876-889"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.70035","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145037807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Voiceless: Division, Distrust and Discrimination at the 2023 Voice Referendum","authors":"Shaun Wilson, Shaun Ratcliff","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.70030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.70030","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The referendum on the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice to Parliament in Australia resulted in defeat for the Yes case on October 14, 2023, by a margin of 40% to 60%. The referendum proposed a constitutional amendment to establish a representative body made up of Indigenous Australians to advise federal parliament on matters affecting the Indigenous community. Polling suggested that the referendum would defy the poor record of mid-term referendums, but the No campaign prevailed. Assessments of this defeat are important to understanding future prospects for reconciliation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. This article develops several hypotheses about factors driving the No result, testing them with a representative sample of 1204 voters conducted in October 2023. Results suggest that the No vote was driven by Coalition partisanship, low trust in media and politics, and most of all, weaker perceptions of No voters of the discrimination faced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"60 2","pages":"532-546"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.70030","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144740347","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}