Rami P Dibbs, Andrew M Ferry, Lesley Davies, David F Bauer, Edward P Buchanan, Han Zhuang Beh
{"title":"Elevated Intracranial Pressure After Primary Surgical Correction of Sagittal Suture Craniosynostosis.","authors":"Rami P Dibbs, Andrew M Ferry, Lesley Davies, David F Bauer, Edward P Buchanan, Han Zhuang Beh","doi":"10.1177/19433875211064680","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19433875211064680","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Study Design</b>: A Case Report. <b>Objective</b>: Craniosynostosis is a craniofacial condition defined by premature fusion of at least one cranial suture. Resynostosis or secondary craniosynostosis of a previously patent adjacent suture following primary repair is a relatively common complication. While studies have assessed the rates of secondary craniosynostosis and subsequent reoperation, extremely limited data regarding reoperation techniques is available. <b>Methods</b>: We present a unique case of a pediatric patient with sagittal craniosynostosis who previously underwent a modified pi procedure and later developed resynostosis of the sagittal suture and secondary synostosis of the bicoronal sutures. We subsequently performed total cranial vault reconstruction with virtual surgical planning (VSP). <b>Results</b>: At his 31-month postoperative follow-up, he displayed normal head shape and denied any clinical signs of elevated intracranial pressures with a normal ophthalmological exam. <b>Conclusions</b>: The reoperation was successful with no significant postoperative complications noted. Performing geometric expansion with VSP to manage fusion of a previously open suture following primary treatment of sagittal synostosis should be considered within the armamentarium of operative options.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":"16 1","pages":"70-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9941297/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10761847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Adam McCann, Kyle Singerman, James Coxe, John Singletary, Jun Wang, Ryan Collar, Tsung-Yen Hsieh
{"title":"Quantifying Aerosol Generation in Maxillofacial Trauma Repair Techniques.","authors":"Adam McCann, Kyle Singerman, James Coxe, John Singletary, Jun Wang, Ryan Collar, Tsung-Yen Hsieh","doi":"10.1177/19433875211059314","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19433875211059314","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cadaveric simulation study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The novel coronavirus (COVID-19), which can be transmitted via aerosolized viral particles, has directed focus on protection of healthcare workers during procedures involving the upper aerodigestive tract, including maxillofacial trauma repair. This study evaluates particle generation at different distances from open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of maxillofacial injuries in the intraoperative setting to reduce the risk of contracting airborne diseases such as COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two cadaveric specimens in a simulated operating room underwent ORIF of midface and mandible fractures via intraoral incisions as well as maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) using hybrid arch bars. ORIF was performed with both self-drilling screws and with the use of a power drill for creating guide holes. Real-time aerosol concentration was measured throughout each procedure using 3 particle counters placed 0.45, 1.68, and 3.81 m (1.5, 5.5, and 12.5 feet, respectively) from the operative site.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant decrease in particle concentration in all procedures at 1.68 m compared to 0.45 m, but only 2 of the 5 procedures showed further significant decrease in particle concentration when going from 1.68 to 3.81 m from the operative site. There was significantly less particle concentration generated at all distances when using self-drilling techniques compared to power drilling for ORIF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consideration of using self-drilling screwing techniques as well as maintaining physical distancing protocols may decrease risk of transmission of airborne diseases such as COVID-19 while in the intraoperative setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":"15 4","pages":"362-368"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647378/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40492724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Juan-Pablo Porte, Lidia M Guerrero, Bonifacio Rivera, Andres Wiscovitch, Jaime Castro-Núñez
{"title":"Odontogenic Keratocyst: A Clinical Entity With Favorable Response to Active Decompression and Distraction Sugosteogenesis.","authors":"Juan-Pablo Porte, Lidia M Guerrero, Bonifacio Rivera, Andres Wiscovitch, Jaime Castro-Núñez","doi":"10.1177/19433875211035237","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19433875211035237","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine the usefulness of active decompression and distraction sugosteogenesis (ADDS) for the management of non-syndromic odontogenic keratocysts (OKC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective case series study was designed and implemented. The study observed the Declaration of Helsinki on medical protocol and ethics and it was approved by the university's Institutional Review Board (IRB). The medical files of all patients who underwent ADDS for OKCs of the jaws at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of a tertiary university-affiliated medical center were reviewed. Data were collected on patient's age, gender, presenting signs and symptoms, lesion location, locularity, pre-ADDS, size of the lesion, post-ADDS, pain, days with bloody discharge and/or proteinaceous fluid inside the system's external unit, days to achieve hermetic seal, size of the lesion 2 weeks after ADDS, percentage of reduction, patient's complaints/complications, and follow-up period. Pre- and post-ADDS panoramic radiographs were reviewed for reduction parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six patients, 5 males and 1 female, with an average age of 45.16 years (range 16-74 years) were studied. ADDS was performed during 4 weeks in all patients. During the therapy, the extraoral unit collected blood during 2.83 days in average. In average, after the third day, the cystic cavity started to drain a proteinaceous fluid for about 9.33 days (range 6-15 days). The average pre-ADDS Standard Lesional Area Index (SLAI) was 18.17 cm<sup>2</sup> (range 4.40 cm<sup>2</sup>-34.58 m<sup>2</sup>) and, after 2 weeks of ADDS, the average SLAI was 5.47 cm<sup>2</sup> (range 0.49 cm<sup>2</sup>-15.39 cm<sup>2</sup>). The average percentage of reduction, after 2 weeks, was 73.93% (range 55.49%-97.51%), which yielded an overall good reaction of OKCs to ADDS. No significant reduction of the lesions was observed from week 2 to week 4, when ADDS ceased. All lesions were enucleated after 3 months. After an average of 14 months of follow-up (12 to 17 months), no signs of recurrence have been observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":"15 4","pages":"268-274"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/19433875211035237","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40689892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jonathan Ribeiro da Silva, Maria Cristina de Moraes Balbas, Caroline Águeda Corrêa, Manuella Zanela, Roberta Okamoto, Rodrigo Dos Santos Pereira, Nicolas Homsi, Eduardo Hochuli-Vieira
{"title":"The Role of Bone Grafts in Preventing Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: Histomorphometric, Immunohistochemical, and Clinical Evaluation in Animal Model.","authors":"Jonathan Ribeiro da Silva, Maria Cristina de Moraes Balbas, Caroline Águeda Corrêa, Manuella Zanela, Roberta Okamoto, Rodrigo Dos Santos Pereira, Nicolas Homsi, Eduardo Hochuli-Vieira","doi":"10.1177/19433875211048367","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19433875211048367","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effects of inorganic bovine bone graft (Lumina Bone, Criteria, Brazil) and beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) graft (ChronOS, Synthes, Brazil) in rats with the risk of developing post-extraction medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen male Wistar rats weighing 350 to 450 g were induced to develop MRONJ using zoledronic acid for 5 weeks. In the sixth week, the right maxillary first molar was extracted. The animals in Group I (G1) did not receive bone grafts after tooth extraction, while Group II (G2) animals received inorganic bovine bone grafts, and Group III (G3) animals received beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) grafts. Clinical evaluation and histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analyses were performed. ANOVA and Tukey's statistical tests were used and a level of significance was considered to be 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the clinical evaluation, animals from G2 and G3 did not present clinical manifestations of osteonecrosis, unlike the control group (G1) animals, which presented necrotic bone tissue exposure in all samples. In the histomorphometric evaluation, animals in G3 showed greater formation of bone tissue (66%) and less formation of bone lacuna (18%) than animals in G1 (58%/32%) and in G2 (59%/27%) (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Moderate (++) immunostaining was observed in G2 and G3 for RANKL, TRAP, and OC, while G1 showed moderate (++) labeling for OC and mild (+) immunostaining for TRAP and RANKL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Greater formation of bone tissue and fewer bone lacunae were found in animals treated with β-TCP. In clinical evaluation, bone graft groups presented with the clinical manifestation of MRONJ and showed higher intensity of immunostaining for TRAP and RANKL. Despite the limitations of experimental animal studies, the results of this work may assist in the development of future clinical research for the prevention of MRONJ.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":"15 4","pages":"304-311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647389/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40690899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Thomas Pepper, Harry Spiers, Alex Weller, Clare Schilling
{"title":"Intraoperative Positioning in Maxillofacial Trauma Patients With Cervical Spine Injury - Is It Safe? Radiological Simulation in a Healthy Volunteer.","authors":"Thomas Pepper, Harry Spiers, Alex Weller, Clare Schilling","doi":"10.1177/19433875211053091","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19433875211053091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Observational.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects on the cervical spine of positioning patients for maxillofacial procedures by simulating intraoperative positions for common maxillofacial procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess the effects of head position in common intraoperative configurations - neutral (anterior mandible position), extended (tracheostomy position) and laterally rotated (mandibular condyle position) on the C-spine of a healthy volunteer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the tracheostomy position, maximal movement occurred in the sagittal plane between the cervico-occipital junction and C4-C5, as well as at the cervico-thoracic junction. Minimal movement occurred at C2 (on C3), C5 (on C6) and C6 (on C7). In the mandibular condyle position, C-spine movements occurred in both rotational and sagittal planes. Maximal movement occurred above the level of C4, concentrated at atlanto-occipital and atlanto-axial (C1-2) joints.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neck extension is likely to be relatively safe in injuries that are stable in flexion and extension, such as odontoid peg fracture and fractures between C5 and C7. Head rotation is likely to be relatively safe in fractures below C4, as well as vertebral body fractures, and laminar fractures without disc disruption. Early dialogue with the neurosurgical team remains a central tenet of safe management of patients with combined maxillofacial and C-spine injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":"15 4","pages":"312-317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647385/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40690901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kiranya E Tipirneni, Amanda Gemmiti, Mark A Arnold, Amar Suryadevara
{"title":"Facial Trauma During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Kiranya E Tipirneni, Amanda Gemmiti, Mark A Arnold, Amar Suryadevara","doi":"10.1177/19433875211053760","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19433875211053760","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 global pandemic on the regional trends in facial trauma at a tertiary care, level 1 trauma center in Central New York.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study sample was derived from the population of patients who presented with facial trauma to the emergency department at the Downtown and/or Community Campuses of SUNY Upstate University Hospital between March 1, 2020, and May 15, 2020, and compared to two historical controls in 2018 and 2019. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were calculated for study variables in each cohort. Poisson regression was used to compare incident rate ratios (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals with significance set at <i>P</i> < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty five patients presented during the COVID-19 pandemic, while 83 presented in 2019 and 95 in 2018. For the study period, the most common mechanism was assault in 47.7%. IRR was significantly lower than in 2018 (IRR = 1.46, <i>P</i> = .018), but not significantly different from 2019 (IRR = 1.28, <i>P</i> = .14). During lockdown, IRR was significantly decreased compared to 2019 (IRR = 1.84, <i>P</i> = .0029) and 2018 (IRR = 2.16, <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The volume of facial trauma seen in Central New York appears undeterred in the absence of \"shelter in place\" orders. Analysis of pandemic and regional trauma variations can offer valuable insight for improved resource allocation to better prepare for potentially high-risk procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":"15 4","pages":"318-324"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647386/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40690904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Safal Dhungel, Zeeshan Ahmad, Simon Holmes
{"title":"Can an App-Based Maxillofacial Trauma Score Predict the Operative Time, ICU Need and Length of Stay?","authors":"Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Safal Dhungel, Zeeshan Ahmad, Simon Holmes","doi":"10.1177/19433875211055598","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19433875211055598","url":null,"abstract":"Study Design Retrospective chart review Objective Injury and trauma scores are the mainstay of predicting outcomes of trauma patients. ZS (Zeeshan and Simon) maxillofacial trauma score is based on 4 previous facial trauma scores and is user friendly, app-based visually coded facial trauma scoring system. Our study was designed to seek the application of an app-based ZS maxillofacial trauma score to predict the operative time, intensive care unit (ICU) need and length of stay. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who presented to a university medical college teaching hospital with maxillofacial fractures from October 2018 until October 2019. ZS maxillofacial trauma scoring app was used to calculate the ZS maxillofacial trauma severity score, which was our primary predictor variable. Our primary outcome of interest was operative time. Our secondary outcome of interest was ICU need and length of stay. Correlation analysis, linear regression and logistic regression were performed for statistical analysis. A statistical P-value of .05 was considered significant at a 95% confidence interval. Results There were 95 male and 5 female patients included in the study. The age ranged from 3 to 84 years with a mean of 30.76 (SD = 14.04). A statistically significant correlation between the ZS score and operative time (r = 0.67, P < .001) was observed. ZS score predicted operative time (b 1 = 7.67, P < .001) in our study sample. Increasing ZS trauma score was also significantly associated with ICU requirement (X 2 (3) = 13.682, P = .003), but the length of stay could not be predicted based on ZS score. Conclusions: ZS maxillofacial trauma score can predict the operative time, and an association was seen with the need for ICU with increasing ZS score, but could not predict the length of stay or the ICU need. It has potential for future integration with electronic health record systems.","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":"15 4","pages":"332-339"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647374/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40689893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Thomas J Sorenson, Matthew D Rich, Abhinav Lamba, Annika Deitermann, Ruth J Barta, Warren Schubert
{"title":"Recreational Motorized Vehicle Use Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drugs Significantly Increases Odds of Craniofacial Injury.","authors":"Thomas J Sorenson, Matthew D Rich, Abhinav Lamba, Annika Deitermann, Ruth J Barta, Warren Schubert","doi":"10.1177/19433875211046721","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19433875211046721","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Concurrent substance-use, including alcohol and drugs, increases the risks of many recreational activities. Our purpose was to determine the relationship between substance use and craniofacial injuries in a large population of patients experiencing trauma due to recreational motorized vehicle use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We report a cross-sectional study of patients reported to the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019, in the United States. Patients were included in our study if they were evaluated in the emergency department (ED) for a recreational motorized vehicle-related injury. Primary outcome was craniofacial injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were a total of 6,485 adult patients who experience an injury after recreational motorized vehicle trauma reported by NEISS-participating EDs during the study period. Of this, 1,416 (21.8%) patients had a craniofacial injury, and 201 patients with craniofacial injuries were under the influence of alcohol/drugs (201/1,416; 14.2%). Injured patients under the influence of alcohol/drugs experienced greater odds of sustaining a general craniofacial injury (OR 2.50, 95% CI: 2.07-3.01, <i>P</i> < .0001), including craniofacial fracture (OR: 2.98, 95% CI: 2.01-4.40, <i>P</i> < .0001), laceration (OR: 2.19, 95% CI: 1.51-3.16, <i>P</i> < .00001) and internal injury (OR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.84-2.95, <i>P</i> < .00001) than injured patients not under the influence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using recreational motorized vehicles under the influence of alcohol or drugs is not safe and increases the likelihood of craniofacial injuries, including fractures, lacerations, and internal injuries. As operating these recreational motorized vehicles under the influence is illegal, the law should be strictly enforced to prevent the occurrence of these injuries. Additional undertakings to increase helmet usage would be valuable.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":"15 4","pages":"282-287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647382/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40690900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vikas S Kotha, Brandon J de Ruiter, M Grace Knudsen, Marvin Nicoleau, Edward H Davidson
{"title":"Should Degree of Third Molar Eruption Influence Operative Management of Mandibular Angle Fractures? A Systematic Review.","authors":"Vikas S Kotha, Brandon J de Ruiter, M Grace Knudsen, Marvin Nicoleau, Edward H Davidson","doi":"10.1177/19433875211059330","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19433875211059330","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is a growing trend toward evidence-based management of third molars in the fracture line of mandibular angle fractures (MAFs). This study aimed to differentiate MAF fixation complications by degree of third molar eruption and by extraction strategy in patients undergoing Champy fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, OVID, SCOPUS, the Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov were queried through May 2020 for English-language publications for MAFs with third molar involvement for this systematic review. Bias was assessed using author-defined criteria. Relative risk (RR) of post-operative complications associated with extracted unerupted and retained partially erupted third molars (Group I) was calculated against controls of retained unerupted and extracted partially erupted third molars (Group II).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies reported complications by eruption or extraction; however, only one study stratified complications by both eruption and extraction to meet inclusion criteria. The risk of bias was medium as only cases meeting defined follow-up were included. 73 cases (N) were included: 34 qualified for Group I and 39 for Group II. Quantitative synthesis of individual case data demonstrated significantly higher complication rate in Group I compared to Group II (23.5% vs 5.1%) (RR 4.6, 95% CI 1.04-20.1). No significant differences were observed between groups for infectious complications, mechanical complications, nonunion, or dehiscence. Reoperation was required significantly more often for Group I (<i>P</i> = .043).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For MAFs involving the third molar, concomitant extraction of unerupted as well as retention of partially erupted third molars increases risk of complications with Champy fixation technique. For these patients, alternative strategies for fixation should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":"15 4","pages":"379-386"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647372/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40689891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tevfik Cicek, Justin van der Tas, Thomas Dodson, Daniel Buchbinder, Stefano Fusetti, Michael Grant, Yiu Yan Leung, Erich Roethlisberger, Gregorio Sánchez Aniceto, Alexander Schramm, Edward Bradley Strong, Gerson Mast, Eppo Wolvius
{"title":"The Global Impact of COVID-19 on Craniomaxillofacial Surgeons: A Follow-Up Survey After One Year.","authors":"Tevfik Cicek, Justin van der Tas, Thomas Dodson, Daniel Buchbinder, Stefano Fusetti, Michael Grant, Yiu Yan Leung, Erich Roethlisberger, Gregorio Sánchez Aniceto, Alexander Schramm, Edward Bradley Strong, Gerson Mast, Eppo Wolvius","doi":"10.1177/19433875211057877","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19433875211057877","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Comparative cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure the impact that COrona VIrus Disease-19 (COVID-19) has had on craniomaxillofacial (CMF) surgeons after 1 year and compare it with 2020 data by (<i>1</i>) measuring access to adequate personal protective equipment (PPE), (<i>2</i>) performance of elective surgery, and (<i>3</i>) the vaccination status. This should be investigated because most CMF surgeons felt that hospitals did not provide them with adequate PPE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The investigators surveyed the international AO CMF membership using a 30-item online questionnaire and compared it to a previous study. The primary predictor variable was year of survey administration. Primary outcome variables were availability of adequate personal protective equipment (adequate/inadequate), performance of elective surgery (yes/no), and vaccination status (fully vaccinated/partly vaccinated/not vaccinated). Descriptive and analytic statistics were computed. Binary logistic regression models were created to measure the association between year and PPE availability. Statistical significance level was set at <i>P</i> < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample was composed of 523 surgeons (2% response rate). Most surgeons reported access to adequate PPE (74.6%). The most adequate PPE was offered in Europe (87.8%) with the least offered in Africa (45.5%). Surgeons in 2021 were more likely to report adequate PPE compared to 2020 (OR 3.74, 95% CI [2.59-4.39]). Most of the respondents resumed elective surgery (79.5% vs 13.3% in 2020) and were fully vaccinated (59.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most CMF surgeons now have access to adequate PPE, resumed elective surgery, and are either fully or partly vaccinated. Future studies should investigate the long-term impact of the fast-evolving COVID-19 pandemic on CMF surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":"15 4","pages":"350-361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647383/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40689895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}