The Global Impact of COVID-19 on Craniomaxillofacial Surgeons: A Follow-Up Survey After One Year.

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Tevfik Cicek, Justin van der Tas, Thomas Dodson, Daniel Buchbinder, Stefano Fusetti, Michael Grant, Yiu Yan Leung, Erich Roethlisberger, Gregorio Sánchez Aniceto, Alexander Schramm, Edward Bradley Strong, Gerson Mast, Eppo Wolvius
{"title":"The Global Impact of COVID-19 on Craniomaxillofacial Surgeons: A Follow-Up Survey After One Year.","authors":"Tevfik Cicek, Justin van der Tas, Thomas Dodson, Daniel Buchbinder, Stefano Fusetti, Michael Grant, Yiu Yan Leung, Erich Roethlisberger, Gregorio Sánchez Aniceto, Alexander Schramm, Edward Bradley Strong, Gerson Mast, Eppo Wolvius","doi":"10.1177/19433875211057877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Comparative cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure the impact that COrona VIrus Disease-19 (COVID-19) has had on craniomaxillofacial (CMF) surgeons after 1 year and compare it with 2020 data by (<i>1</i>) measuring access to adequate personal protective equipment (PPE), (<i>2</i>) performance of elective surgery, and (<i>3</i>) the vaccination status. This should be investigated because most CMF surgeons felt that hospitals did not provide them with adequate PPE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The investigators surveyed the international AO CMF membership using a 30-item online questionnaire and compared it to a previous study. The primary predictor variable was year of survey administration. Primary outcome variables were availability of adequate personal protective equipment (adequate/inadequate), performance of elective surgery (yes/no), and vaccination status (fully vaccinated/partly vaccinated/not vaccinated). Descriptive and analytic statistics were computed. Binary logistic regression models were created to measure the association between year and PPE availability. Statistical significance level was set at <i>P</i> < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample was composed of 523 surgeons (2% response rate). Most surgeons reported access to adequate PPE (74.6%). The most adequate PPE was offered in Europe (87.8%) with the least offered in Africa (45.5%). Surgeons in 2021 were more likely to report adequate PPE compared to 2020 (OR 3.74, 95% CI [2.59-4.39]). Most of the respondents resumed elective surgery (79.5% vs 13.3% in 2020) and were fully vaccinated (59.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most CMF surgeons now have access to adequate PPE, resumed elective surgery, and are either fully or partly vaccinated. Future studies should investigate the long-term impact of the fast-evolving COVID-19 pandemic on CMF surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647383/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875211057877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Comparative cross-sectional.

Objective: To measure the impact that COrona VIrus Disease-19 (COVID-19) has had on craniomaxillofacial (CMF) surgeons after 1 year and compare it with 2020 data by (1) measuring access to adequate personal protective equipment (PPE), (2) performance of elective surgery, and (3) the vaccination status. This should be investigated because most CMF surgeons felt that hospitals did not provide them with adequate PPE.

Methods: The investigators surveyed the international AO CMF membership using a 30-item online questionnaire and compared it to a previous study. The primary predictor variable was year of survey administration. Primary outcome variables were availability of adequate personal protective equipment (adequate/inadequate), performance of elective surgery (yes/no), and vaccination status (fully vaccinated/partly vaccinated/not vaccinated). Descriptive and analytic statistics were computed. Binary logistic regression models were created to measure the association between year and PPE availability. Statistical significance level was set at P < .05.

Results: The sample was composed of 523 surgeons (2% response rate). Most surgeons reported access to adequate PPE (74.6%). The most adequate PPE was offered in Europe (87.8%) with the least offered in Africa (45.5%). Surgeons in 2021 were more likely to report adequate PPE compared to 2020 (OR 3.74, 95% CI [2.59-4.39]). Most of the respondents resumed elective surgery (79.5% vs 13.3% in 2020) and were fully vaccinated (59.1%).

Conclusions: Most CMF surgeons now have access to adequate PPE, resumed elective surgery, and are either fully or partly vaccinated. Future studies should investigate the long-term impact of the fast-evolving COVID-19 pandemic on CMF surgeons.

COVID-19对颅颌面外科医生的全球影响:一年后的随访调查
研究设计:比较横断面。目的:通过(1)测量获得足够的个人防护装备(PPE)的情况,(2)选择性手术的表现,(3)疫苗接种情况,衡量2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)对颅颌面外科医生(CMF) 1年后的影响,并与2020年的数据进行比较。应该对此进行调查,因为大多数CMF外科医生认为医院没有向他们提供足够的个人防护装备。方法:采用30项在线问卷对国际AO CMF会员进行调查,并与之前的研究进行比较。主要预测变量是调查管理的年份。主要结局变量为是否有充足的个人防护装备(充足/不足)、是否进行选择性手术(是/否)和疫苗接种状况(完全接种/部分接种/未接种)。计算描述性统计和分析性统计。建立了二元逻辑回归模型来衡量年份与PPE可用性之间的关系。差异有统计学意义,P < 0.05。结果:本组共523名外科医生,有效率为2%。大多数外科医生报告获得了足够的个人防护装备(74.6%)。欧洲提供的个人防护装备最充足(87.8%),非洲提供的最少(45.5%)。与2020年相比,2021年的外科医生更有可能报告足够的PPE (OR 3.74, 95% CI[2.59-4.39])。大多数受访者恢复了择期手术(79.5%,2020年为13.3%),并充分接种了疫苗(59.1%)。结论:大多数CMF外科医生现在可以获得足够的个人防护装备,恢复选择性手术,并全部或部分接种疫苗。未来的研究应调查快速发展的COVID-19大流行对CMF外科医生的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信