Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling最新文献_第9页

How do the questions asked affect suspects' perceptions of the interviewer's prior knowledge? 所问的问题如何影响嫌疑人对采访者先验知识的认知?

IF 1 4区心理学

Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling Pub Date : 2020-03-12 DOI: 10.1002/jip.1546

Meghana Srivatsav, Timothy J. Luke, Pär Anders Granhag, Aldert Vrij

{"title":"How do the questions asked affect suspects' perceptions of the interviewer's prior knowledge?","authors":"Meghana Srivatsav, Timothy J. Luke, Pär Anders Granhag, Aldert Vrij","doi":"10.1002/jip.1546","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1546","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to understand if guilty suspects' perceptions regarding the prior information or evidence held by the interviewer against the suspect could be influenced through the content of the investigative questions. To test this idea, we explored three question-phrasing factors that we labeled as topic discussion (if a specific crime-related topic was discussed or not), specificity (different levels of crime-related details included in the questions), and stressor (emphasis on the importance of the specific crime-related detail in the questions). The three factors were chosen based on relevance theory, a psycholinguistic theory that explores how people draw inferences from the communicated content. Participants (N = 370) assumed the role of the suspect and read a crime narrative and an interview transcript based on the suspect's activities. After reading the narrative and the transcripts, participants responded to scales that measured their perception of interviewer's prior knowledge (perceived interviewer knowledge [PIK]) regarding the suspects' role in the crime, based on the questions posed by the interviewer in the transcripts. Of the three factors tested, we found that questioning about a specific crime-related topic (topic discussion) increased their PIK. This study is the first to explore the underlying mechanisms of how suspects draw inferences regarding the interviewer's prior knowledge through the content of the investigative questions adopting concepts of psycholinguistic theory.","PeriodicalId":46397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jip.1546","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"137828790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Examining the narrative roles in suicide notes 审视遗书中的叙事角色

IF 1 4区心理学

Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling Pub Date : 2020-03-03 DOI: 10.1002/jip.1545

Stacey Grayson, Calli Tzani-Pepelasi, Ntaniella-Roumpini Pylarinou, Maria Ioannou, Vasiliki Artinopoulou

引用次数: 3

Eliciting intelligence from sources informed about counter-interrogation strategies: An experimental study on the Scharff technique 从获知反审讯策略的来源中获取情报:沙夫技术的实验研究

IF 1 4区心理学

Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling Pub Date : 2020-02-14 DOI: 10.1002/jip.1542

Sara Rantamäki, Jan Antfolk, Pär Anders Granhag, Pekka Santtila, Simon Oleszkiewicz

{"title":"Eliciting intelligence from sources informed about counter-interrogation strategies: An experimental study on the Scharff technique","authors":"Sara Rantamäki, Jan Antfolk, Pär Anders Granhag, Pekka Santtila, Simon Oleszkiewicz","doi":"10.1002/jip.1542","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jip.1542","url":null,"abstract":"The Scharff technique aims to elicit information by affecting the source's perception of the interviewer's existing knowledge. Although the technique has been found to be effective for gathering new information, countermeasures to the technique have not been examined. In a 2 × 2 between-subjects experiment, we informed half of the 120 sources about the counter-interrogation strategy of carefully considering the interviewer's prior knowledge and the tactic of providing information perceived as already known to the interviewer. After this, sources were interviewed with the Scharff technique or the Direct approach, widely used in human intelligence-gathering situations and consisting of open-ended and direct questions. We found that “informed sources” did not succeed in revealing information already known to the interviewer, where informed sources and uninformed sources revealed known information to a similar degree (1.62 pieces vs. 1.65 pieces). Sources interviewed with the Direct approach (vs. Scharff technique) revealed a larger amount of information previously known to the interviewer (2.18 pieces vs. 1.08 pieces). When interviewed with the Scharff technique, sources informed about the counter-interrogation strategy attempted to adopt more counter-interrogation strategies. The present study replicates earlier research on the Scharff technique as a technique effective in affecting the source's perception of the interviewer's prior knowledge. The results of the current study indicate that both the Scharff technique and the Direct approach might be similarly robust against counter-interrogation strategies, in terms of gathering new information. Future studies should focus on implementing more comprehensive training in counter-interrogation strategies for the sources.","PeriodicalId":46397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2020-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jip.1542","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45927272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Eliciting information and cues to deception using a model statement: Examining the effect of presentation modality 使用模型陈述引出信息和欺骗线索:检验呈现方式的效果

IF 1 4区心理学

Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling Pub Date : 2020-02-08 DOI: 10.1002/jip.1541

Cody Normitta Porter, Giacomo Salvanelli

引用次数: 3

Freedom deprivation in prisons of Serbia 塞尔维亚监狱中被剥夺自由

IF 1 4区心理学

Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling Pub Date : 2020-01-29 DOI: 10.1002/jip.1540

Goran Jovanić, Vera Petrović, Nebojša Macanović

引用次数: 1

Vulnerable suspects in police interviews: Exploring current practice in England and Wales 警察采访中的弱势嫌疑人:探索英格兰和威尔士的现行做法

IF 1 4区心理学

Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling Pub Date : 2019-11-18 DOI: 10.1002/jip.1537

Laura Farrugia, Fiona Gabbert

引用次数: 13

Complications travel: A cross-cultural comparison of the proportion of complications as a verbal cue to deceit 并发症旅行:并发症作为言语暗示欺骗的比例的跨文化比较

IF 1 4区心理学

Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling Pub Date : 2019-11-15 DOI: 10.1002/jip.1538

Aldert Vrij, Sharon Vrij

引用次数: 13

Profiling Korean sex crimes: Offender characteristics and crime scene actions 韩国性犯罪特征分析:罪犯特征与犯罪现场行为

IF 1 4区心理学

Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling Pub Date : 2019-11-08 DOI: 10.1002/jip.1539

Sunghwan Kim, Louise Almond, Marie Eyre

引用次数: 0

Looking guilty: Handcuffing suspects influences judgments of deception 看起来有罪:给嫌疑人戴上手铐会影响对欺骗行为的判断

IF 1 4区心理学

Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling Pub Date : 2019-09-25 DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/mz76p

Mircea Zloteanu, Nadine L. Salman, Daniel C. Richardson

{"title":"Looking guilty: Handcuffing suspects influences judgments of deception","authors":"Mircea Zloteanu, Nadine L. Salman, Daniel C. Richardson","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/mz76p","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/mz76p","url":null,"abstract":"Detecting deception is an important task in legal and investigative contexts, where the outcome of a charging decision or criminal trial can hang on the credibility of victim, witness or suspect testimony. However, people are poor judges of deception, often relying on incorrect nonverbal cues for their decision, when such behaviors may reflect the situation more than the sender’s internal state. Over two studies, we investigated one such situational factor relevant to forensic contexts: handcuffing suspects. Suspects provided truthful and deceptive responses in an interrogation setting, where half were in handcuffs. We investigated how suspects were judged by (a) an interrogator who was in the room, and (b) observers watching video recordings, either laypeople or police officers. Handcuffing was predicted to undermine efforts to detect deception, either by constraining suspects' gesticulation or by activating stereotypes associated with criminality. Indeed, handcuffing affected both suspect behavior (Study 1) and observers’ veracity judgments (Study 2). The findings highlight the need for research on situational factors, to inform deception detection and forensic practice.","PeriodicalId":46397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69648276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

How do the questions asked affect suspects' perceptions of the interviewer's prior knowledge? 所问的问题如何影响嫌疑人对面试官先前知识的认知？

IF 1 4区心理学

Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling Pub Date : 2019-09-23 DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/tdsrv

Meghana Srivatsav, Timothy J. Luke, P. Granhag, A. Vrij

{"title":"How do the questions asked affect suspects' perceptions of the interviewer's prior knowledge?","authors":"Meghana Srivatsav, Timothy J. Luke, P. Granhag, A. Vrij","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/tdsrv","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tdsrv","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to understand if guilty suspects’ perceptions regarding the prior information or evidence held by the interviewer against the suspect could be influenced through the content of the investigative questions. To test this idea, we explored three question-phrasing factors that we labeled as Topic Discussion (if a specific crime-related topic was discussed or not), Specificity (different levels of crime-related details included in the questions) and Stressor (emphasis on the importance of the specific crime-related detail in the questions). The three factors were chosen based on relevance theory, a psycholinguistic theory that explores how people draw inferences from the communicated content. Participants (N= 370) assumed the role of the suspect and read a crime narrative and an interview transcript based on the suspect’s activities. After reading the narrative and the transcripts, participants responded to scales that measured their perception of interviewer’s prior knowledge (PIK) regarding the suspects’ role in the crime, based on the questions posed by the interviewer in the transcripts. Of the three factors tested, we found that questioning about a specific crime-related topic (Topic Discussion) increased their PIK. This study is the first to explore the underlying mechanisms of how suspects draw inferences regarding the interviewer’s prior knowledge through the content of the investigative questions adopting concepts of psycholinguistic theory.","PeriodicalId":46397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47315427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2