History Compass最新文献_第2页

IF 0.6

History Compass Pub Date : 2026-01-17

引用次数: 0

The European Art Market in the Twentieth Century: A Review of Studies on Art as Capital and Property 20世纪的欧洲艺术市场：作为资本和财产的艺术研究述评

IF 0.6

History Compass Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1111/hic3.70025

Maddalena Alvi

{"title":"The European Art Market in the Twentieth Century: A Review of Studies on Art as Capital and Property","authors":"Maddalena Alvi","doi":"10.1111/hic3.70025","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hic3.70025","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Art embodies material and symbolic value; it is a source of intellectual and cultural nourishment, a marker of social status, a symbol of national dignity, private or public property. Yet, art is also a commodity—one that has shaped and been shaped by a long and complex history: that of the art market. This article examines the twentieth-century art trade as a crucial area for historical inquiry, offers a review of existing scholarship in the field, and addresses the issue of its historicisation. It engages with contributions from external disciplines (economics, sociology, anthropology, art history) and various sub-fields within history (political, cultural, and social histories) that have contributed to the study of commercial and cultural dynamics and the evolution of art markets. To make sense of this interdisciplinary field, this paper proposes a framework based on the notion that art is the crucible of property and capital. This lens provides a valuable perspective to contextualise the trade in the history of twentieth-century Europe and to use the market as a source to understand developments in European cultural, social, and economic history.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":46376,"journal":{"name":"History Compass","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145963814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

IF 0.6

History Compass Pub Date : 2026-01-07

引用次数: 0

IF 0.6

History Compass Pub Date : 2025-12-31

引用次数: 0

IF 0.6

History Compass Pub Date : 2025-12-31

引用次数: 0

Ethnohistory and Indigenous People on Argentina's Southern Frontier: Pampas-Patagonia, 1810–1885 阿根廷南部边境的民族历史与原住民：潘帕斯-巴塔哥尼亚，1810-1885

IF 0.6

History Compass Pub Date : 2025-12-31 DOI: 10.1111/hic3.70024

Robert Christensen

引用次数: 0

The Past in the Present: Understanding Australian Attitudes to History 从过去到现在：理解澳大利亚人对历史的态度

IF 0.6

History Compass Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI: 10.1111/hic3.70022

Joanna Cruickshank, David Lowe, Andrew Singleton

{"title":"The Past in the Present: Understanding Australian Attitudes to History","authors":"Joanna Cruickshank, David Lowe, Andrew Singleton","doi":"10.1111/hic3.70022","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hic3.70022","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Every year, millions of Australians choose to read popular history and watch historical documentaries. Despite the apparent political, social, economic and personal significance of history, we have very little reliable information about what Australians think and believe about history. What do Australians think that history is? What do they think it is for? How have they learnt about the past and how do they decide what historical knowledge is trustworthy? What role do they believe history should play in the life of the nation? In this article, we present the findings from the Deakin Contemporary History Survey (DCHS), a large-scale, nationally representative programme. This survey, with repeated cross-sectional waves conducted in 2021, 2023 and 2024, aimed to explore Australians' perceptions of history, its role in national life and their beliefs about historical knowledge and its credibility. We begin by placing these surveys within the context of similar research undertaken in Australia and elsewhere, outlining the methodology and scope of our approach. The three surveys reveal some widely shared attitudes towards history among Australians as well as areas of significant disagreement. They point particularly to generational shifts in understanding the nature of history and its relationship to national identity. Based on these results, we also identify some directions that will be fruitful for further and more in-depth investigation.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":46376,"journal":{"name":"History Compass","volume":"23 10-12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145824587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A “Documentary Turn” in the Medieval History of Egypt and Syria? 中世纪埃及和叙利亚历史的“纪录片化”？

IF 0.6

History Compass Pub Date : 2025-11-29 DOI: 10.1111/hic3.70021

Daisy Livingston

引用次数: 0

Teaching & Learning Guide for: Political Challenges and Economic Cooperation: The Legacy of the 1930s USSR-Turkey Economic Relations and the Contemporary Economic Context of Russia-Turkey 《政治挑战与经济合作：20世纪30年代苏联与土耳其经济关系的遗产和俄罗斯与土耳其的当代经济背景》的教学指南

IF 0.6

History Compass Pub Date : 2025-10-04 DOI: 10.1111/hic3.70017

Önder Deniz

引用次数: 0

Histories of Untranslatability in South Asia: Historiography, Debates, and Problems, 1980–2010 南亚不可译性的历史：史学、争论和问题，1980-2010

IF 0.6

History Compass Pub Date : 2025-08-22 DOI: 10.1111/hic3.70019

Vipin Krishna

{"title":"Histories of Untranslatability in South Asia: Historiography, Debates, and Problems, 1980–2010","authors":"Vipin Krishna","doi":"10.1111/hic3.70019","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hic3.70019","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Untranslatability is not a separate field of study in history; rather, it is a conceptual lens that captures the concerns of certain strands of scholarship which have tended to somewhat problematize connections, translations, and mediation across imperial and colonial divides. Usually, such histories have taken stock of the problematic relation shared by “universals” and “particulars,” and in doing so, have sought to engage with vernacular categories and histories following the “linguistic turn” in history. South Asian postcolonial histories since the 1950s have taken stock of these issues of untranslatability with treatments of such issues reaching their zenith through the post-structuralist, Saidian, and Subaltern schools of historiography. This article surveys certain works in South Asian history and argues that untranslatability must be employed as a lens to understand the relationship that cultural translation shares with power. In examining these debates, this article revisits these concerns through a series of other concepts that have marked the historiography of the problem in recent times, namely continuity, conciliation, and commensurability, before reconsidering whether untranslatability can still serve as a meaningful historiographical tool, and how it has begun to figure as one in newer works.</p>","PeriodicalId":46376,"journal":{"name":"History Compass","volume":"23 7-9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hic3.70019","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144888336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0