Argumentation最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
The Persistent Interlocutor 持久的对话者
IF 1.2 2区 文学
Argumentation Pub Date : 2022-09-07 DOI: 10.1007/s10503-022-09578-2
Job de Grefte
{"title":"The Persistent Interlocutor","authors":"Job de Grefte","doi":"10.1007/s10503-022-09578-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10503-022-09578-2","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A Persistent Interlocutor (PI) is someone who, in argumentative contexts, does not cease to question her opponent’s premises. The epistemic relevance of the PI has been debated throughout the history of philosophy. Pyrrhonians famously claim that our inability to dialectically vindicate our claims against a PI implies scepticism. Adam Leite disagrees (2005). Michael Resorla argues that the debate is based on a false premise (2009). In this paper, I argue that these views all fail to accurately account for the epistemic relevance of the PI. I then briefly present an account that aims to do better in this regard, based on the modal notion of safety. On the account proposed, the PI does not violate epistemic or dialectical norms. Rather, her behaviour tends to be epistemically perverse in the sense that it wastes cognitive resources. Perhaps surprisingly, this defect turns out not to be unique to the PI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46219,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation","volume":"37 1","pages":"53 - 68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10503-022-09578-2.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50460682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Bramhall Versus Hobbes: The Rhetoric of Religion vs. the Rhetoric of Philosophy 布拉姆霍尔与霍布斯:宗教修辞与哲学修辞
IF 1.2 2区 文学
Argumentation Pub Date : 2022-09-06 DOI: 10.1007/s10503-022-09582-6
Shai Fogel
{"title":"Bramhall Versus Hobbes: The Rhetoric of Religion vs. the Rhetoric of Philosophy","authors":"Shai Fogel","doi":"10.1007/s10503-022-09582-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10503-022-09582-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The paper uses the controversy about liberty between the philosopher Thomas Hobbes and Archbishop John Bramhall to illustrate the conflict between the rhetoric of philosophy and the rhetoric of religion. The first part of the paper introduces initial definitions of these two types of rhetoric. The following three parts deal with three distinct parts of the controversy, as Hobbes and Bramhall define them: to the reader, arguments from scripture, and arguments from reason. The fact that Hobbes and Bramhall themselves divide the arguments into those from scripture and those from reason makes this controversy a good illustration of the conflict between rhetoric of philosophy and rhetoric of religion.</p><p>The rhetorical perspective exposes the epistemological conflict between philosophy and religion that the philosophical discourse often blurs. It is a conflict that concerns the basic attitude of an individual towards the truth as a believer or as a thinker. The rhetoric of philosophy assumes that human understanding defines the truth and therefore gives priority to arguments from reason as they address that understanding. The rhetoric of religion assumes that truth is beyond human understanding and can only be revealed by faith and therefore gives priority to arguments from scripture as they address human faith. The reader may join the opponents in asking whether human liberty is a philosophical issue and therefore subject to arguments from reason or a theological one, subject to arguments from scripture.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46219,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation","volume":"36 4","pages":"481 - 491"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10503-022-09582-6.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50457428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Twitter Activists’ Argumentation Through Subdiscussions: Theory, Method and Illustration of the Controversy Surrounding Sustainable Fashion 推特活动人士的争论:可持续时尚争议的理论、方法和例证
IF 1.2 2区 文学
Argumentation Pub Date : 2022-09-06 DOI: 10.1007/s10503-022-09579-1
Sara Greco
{"title":"Twitter Activists’ Argumentation Through Subdiscussions: Theory, Method and Illustration of the Controversy Surrounding Sustainable Fashion","authors":"Sara Greco","doi":"10.1007/s10503-022-09579-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10503-022-09579-1","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>“Why are millions of dollars worth of orders being left unpaid?”. With tweets like this questioning brands’ policies, activists advocating for sustainable fashion re-discuss material starting points that are assumed by fashion brands, who argue that they are sustainable because they care about their workers’ conditions. This paper argues that activists use tweets to open <i>subdiscussions on material starting points</i> to engage citizens and consumers, re-discussing factual <i>data</i> that brands take for granted, such as the fact that they provide fair conditions for their garment workers. Activists justify their opening of subdiscussions, often through an argumentative pattern that includes an argument based on the <i>locus from effects to cause</i>. They argue that if there are negative effects, the brand cannot claim to care about the conditions of its workers. In discussing how subdiscussions are used by fashion activists, this paper also introduces a conceptualization of Twitter argumentation as a discussion that is not isolated, but is part of a polylogical argumentation that takes place in different venues. For this reason, the argumentation used in tweets is reconstructed as a response to a fashion brand’s communication campaigns around sustainability, which extend beyond the confines of Twitter. As an empirical illustration, this paper is based on the campaign targeting fashion retailer Primark; the dataset includes the brand’s website as well as activists’ tweets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46219,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation","volume":"37 1","pages":"1 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10503-022-09579-1.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10717936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Michel Meyer (1950–2022) 米歇尔·迈耶(1950–2022)
IF 1.2 2区 文学
Argumentation Pub Date : 2022-08-24 DOI: 10.1007/s10503-022-09577-3
Christian Plantin
{"title":"Michel Meyer (1950–2022)","authors":"Christian Plantin","doi":"10.1007/s10503-022-09577-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10503-022-09577-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46219,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation","volume":"36 3","pages":"453 - 454"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50509505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Frans H. A. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.): Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical Studies About Argumentative Discourse in Context 范·埃默伦和巴特·加森(编辑):实际实践中的论证:语境中论证话语的专题研究
IF 1.2 2区 文学
Argumentation Pub Date : 2022-08-04 DOI: 10.1007/s10503-022-09576-4
Harry Weger
{"title":"Frans H. A. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.): Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical Studies About Argumentative Discourse in Context","authors":"Harry Weger","doi":"10.1007/s10503-022-09576-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10503-022-09576-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46219,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation","volume":"36 3","pages":"439 - 445"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50448017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Ruth Amossy: In defense of polemics, Springer, Argumentation Library, Volume 42, 2021 Ruth Amossy:为论战辩护,施普林格,论证图书馆,2021年第42卷
IF 1.2 2区 文学
Argumentation Pub Date : 2022-07-07 DOI: 10.1007/s10503-022-09575-5
Jean-Claude Guerrini
{"title":"Ruth Amossy: In defense of polemics, Springer, Argumentation Library, Volume 42, 2021","authors":"Jean-Claude Guerrini","doi":"10.1007/s10503-022-09575-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10503-022-09575-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46219,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation","volume":"36 3","pages":"447 - 451"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10503-022-09575-5.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50458456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Nanon Labrie: argumentation between doctors and patients: understanding clinical argumentative discourse Frans H.van Eemeren、Bart Garssen和Nanon Labrie:医生和患者之间的争论:理解临床争论话语
IF 1.2 2区 文学
Argumentation Pub Date : 2022-07-04 DOI: 10.1007/s10503-022-09574-6
Lei ZHU, Wei WANG
{"title":"Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Nanon Labrie: argumentation between doctors and patients: understanding clinical argumentative discourse","authors":"Lei ZHU,&nbsp;Wei WANG","doi":"10.1007/s10503-022-09574-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10503-022-09574-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The latest book is a timely application of the Pragma-Dialectical argumentative approach to medical consultation. The book consists of six chapters, which are concerned with topics pertaining to resolving differences of the opinion in doctor-patient interaction. With the publication of the book, the authors have made new contributions to the field of doctor-patient argumentative discourse.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46219,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation","volume":"37 1","pages":"147 - 152"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50449254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Arguing with Children: Exploring Problems of Charity and Strawmanning 与孩子争论:慈善与流浪问题探析
IF 1.2 2区 文学
Argumentation Pub Date : 2022-06-04 DOI: 10.1007/s10503-022-09572-8
Swagatanjali Bauri
{"title":"Arguing with Children: Exploring Problems of Charity and Strawmanning","authors":"Swagatanjali Bauri","doi":"10.1007/s10503-022-09572-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10503-022-09572-8","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper will highlight how the existing approaches to the Strawman Fallacy and the Principle of Charity are unable to fully accommodate the problems of interpreting children’s arguments. A lack of charity is as problematic as an excess of charity when arguing with children, and can contribute to misinterpretation of arguments. An application of moderate charity avoids the pitfalls of misrepresenting children. However, interpreting children’s arguments with the appropriate amount of charity is a challenging task. The argumentative context is relevant in determining the interpretive approach and the extent of charity that can be justified. The context of arguing with children necessitates an Ethics of Care-based approach to interpretation. Michael Gilbert’s concept of coalescent argumentation exemplifies how Ethics of Care can be realized during argumentative exchanges involving children.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46219,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation","volume":"36 3","pages":"415 - 438"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50449263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing “协议建立,分歧摧毁:”波兰本科生和毕业生如何理解人际争论
IF 1.2 2区 文学
Argumentation Pub Date : 2022-04-14 DOI: 10.1007/s10503-022-09570-w
Kamila Dębowska-Kozłowska, Dale Hample
{"title":"“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing","authors":"Kamila Dębowska-Kozłowska,&nbsp;Dale Hample","doi":"10.1007/s10503-022-09570-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10503-022-09570-w","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This is a descriptive study (<i>N</i> = 243) of how Polish undergraduates and graduates perceive face to face arguing. We had some reasons to suppose that they would not be especially aggressive. The Polish culture has a number of proverbs warning against combative arguing, with “agreement builds and disagreement destroys” being illustrative. In addition, up until 1989 public dissent and open disagreements were suppressed by the government, and older generations often found it prudent to avoid arguing. We compared Polish results with previously reported data from the U.S. and Ukraine. We did, in fact, find that Polish orientations were less aggressive and more other-oriented than the two comparison nations. We also discovered Poland was more wary of engaging in interpersonal conflicts. Distinct sex differences appeared when we compared Polish men and women, with men being more forceful. Correlational patterns, especially concerning argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness, were largely consistent with those originally found in the U.S. Power distance continues to have important connections with the standard argument orientation measures, but its patterns of correlation are not entirely consistent across the relatively small number of nations where the variable has been studied.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46219,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation","volume":"36 3","pages":"365 - 392"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50479941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Questions, Presuppositions and Fallacies 问题、预设和谬误
IF 1.2 2区 文学
Argumentation Pub Date : 2022-03-28 DOI: 10.1007/s10503-022-09566-6
Andrei Moldovan
{"title":"Questions, Presuppositions and Fallacies","authors":"Andrei Moldovan","doi":"10.1007/s10503-022-09566-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10503-022-09566-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper I focus on the fallacy known as Complex Question or Many Questions. After a brief introduction, in Sect. 2 I highlight its pragmatic dimension, and in Sect. 3 its dialectical dimension. In Sect. 4 I present two accounts of this fallacy developed in argumentation theory, Douglas Walton’s and the Pragma-Dialectics’, which have resources to capture both its pragmatic and its dialectical nature. However, these accounts are unsatisfactory for various reasons. In Sect. 5 I focus on the pragmatic dimension of the fallacy and I suggest amendments to the accounts mentioned drawing on the study of the phenomenon of presupposition in theoretical pragmatics. I argue that the central notion in the definition of the fallacy is that of an informative presupposition. In Sect. 6 I focus on the dialectical dimension of the fallacy. This dimension needs to be explicitly acknowledged in the definition of the fallacy in order to distinguish it from a different, non-dialectical, fallacious argumentative move involving presuppositions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46219,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation","volume":"36 2","pages":"287 - 303"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10503-022-09566-6.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50520428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信