Argumentation最新文献_第5页

The Fallacy Fallacy: From the Owl of Minerva to the Lark of Arete 谬论：从密涅瓦的猫头鹰到阿雷特的云雀

IF 1.2 2区文学

Argumentation Pub Date : 2023-02-12 DOI: 10.1007/s10503-023-09595-9

Andrew Aberdein

引用次数: 0

Introduction to the Special Issue on Fallacies 谬论特刊简介

IF 1.2 2区文学

Argumentation Pub Date : 2023-02-10 DOI: 10.1007/s10503-023-09607-8

Hans V. Hansen

引用次数: 0

Committing Fallacies and the Appearance Condition 犯罪谬误及其产生条件

IF 1.2 2区文学

Argumentation Pub Date : 2023-02-10 DOI: 10.1007/s10503-023-09606-9

Hans V. Hansen

引用次数: 0

Textbook Treatments of Fallacies 谬论的教科书处理

IF 1.2 2区文学

Argumentation Pub Date : 2023-02-09 DOI: 10.1007/s10503-023-09600-1

David Hitchcock

引用次数: 0

Social Justice, Fallacies of Argument, and Persistent Bias 社会正义、论证谬误和持续的偏见

IF 1.2 2区文学

Argumentation Pub Date : 2023-02-02 DOI: 10.1007/s10503-023-09603-y

Catherine Hundleby

{"title":"Social Justice, Fallacies of Argument, and Persistent Bias","authors":"Catherine Hundleby","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09603-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10503-023-09603-y","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The fallacies approach to argument evaluation can exacerbate problems it aims to address when it comes to social bias, perpetuating social injustice. A diagnosis that an argument commits a fallacy may flag the irrelevance of stereotypical characterizations to the line of reasoning without directly challenging the stereotypes. This becomes most apparent when personal bias is part of the subject matter under discussion, in ethotic argument, including <i>ad hominem</i> and <i>ad verecundiam</i>, which may be recognized as fallacious without addressing whether the ethotic presumptions are true. Yap (2013; 2015) makes this case for <i>ad hominem</i> and the pragma-dialectical understanding of fallacies, expanded here to show related patterns in some other fallacies, and employing the argument schemes understanding of fallacies. Adding critical questions increases the ways reasoners can dismiss arguments as fallacious, and could include directly addressing bias, but if an argument fails on a different critical question, that may yet allow the bias to pass. The fallacies approach is a form of meta-debate and techniques of meta-debate need to address the ubiquity of social bias, not convey them as specialized problems. The view that the fallacies approach to argument evaluation can provide neutrality is dangerously false. Arguers thus should avoid using fallacies for argument evaluation where social stereotypes or schemas might be involved, especially when the subject matter relates closely to social justice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46219,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation","volume":"37 2","pages":"281 - 293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50438504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Locke and “ad” 洛克与“广告”

IF 1.2 2区文学

Argumentation Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1007/s10503-023-09594-w

Richard Davies

引用次数: 0

Free Speech Fallacies as Meta-Argumentative Errors 作为元论证错误的言论自由谬误

IF 1.2 2区文学

Argumentation Pub Date : 2023-01-27 DOI: 10.1007/s10503-023-09601-0

Scott F. Aikin, John Casey

引用次数: 1

What Do We Mean by ‘That’s a Fallacious Narrative’? 我们所说的“这是一个荒谬的叙述”是什么意思？

IF 1.2 2区文学

Argumentation Pub Date : 2023-01-27 DOI: 10.1007/s10503-023-09599-5

Paula Olmos

{"title":"What Do We Mean by ‘That’s a Fallacious Narrative’?","authors":"Paula Olmos","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09599-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10503-023-09599-5","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper tries to offer a descriptive account of the normative workings of evaluative fallacy charges directed to narratives. In order to do that, I first defend the continuity and mutual dependence, as based on a dynamical conception of argument, between the ‘belief conception’ and the ‘argumentative conception’ of fallacy. Then, I construe a catalogue of ‘fallacy charges’ based on both such a continuity and the variety of counterarguments explored by the theoretical framework of Argument Dialectics. And finally, I apply these ideas and distinctions in the analysis of four examples of published texts in which the charge of ‘fallacious narrative’ is issued by a discursive agent against other discursive agents’ either full-fledged narratives or narrative assumptions. The analyses confirm some of the characteristics mentioned in the catalogue as well as the argumentative nature of fallacy charges, even when the censored discourse does not exactly or explicitly contain an argument. The analyses also help understand the distinction between a rather concrete ‘linguistic’ use of the term narrative and a more abstract and elusive ‘discursive’ one, in which the difficulties of both identifying the object of censorship and the exact meaning of the fallacy charge multiply.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46219,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation","volume":"37 2","pages":"307 - 321"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10503-023-09599-5.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50517620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Correlations Between Parliamentary Debate Participation, Communication Competence, Communication Apprehension, Argumentativeness, and Willingness to Communicate in a Japanese Context 日本语境下议会辩论参与度、沟通能力、沟通理解力、辩论性和沟通意愿的相关性

IF 1.2 2区文学

Argumentation Pub Date : 2023-01-16 DOI: 10.1007/s10503-022-09591-5

Kota Jodoi

{"title":"The Correlations Between Parliamentary Debate Participation, Communication Competence, Communication Apprehension, Argumentativeness, and Willingness to Communicate in a Japanese Context","authors":"Kota Jodoi","doi":"10.1007/s10503-022-09591-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10503-022-09591-5","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Studies focusing on debate as pedagogy have been gaining attention recently. However, most research has employed policy debate, which is a traditional debate style. Parliamentary debate, which is an impromptu debate style, has been recently gaining popularity worldwide. As minimal research exists on parliamentary debate as pedagogy, the present study examined the correlations between parliamentary debate participation, communication competence, communication apprehension, argumentativeness, and willingness to communicate. Moreover, this study aimed to investigate the unique characteristics of communication variables and correlations with the experience of participating in a parliamentary debate in a Japanese context, an area that interests many scholars. The results showed some differences in correlations between Japanese and United States samples, which was explained by analyzing a trait of Japanese culture that is characterized as highly contextual. Regarding the correlations between communication variables and parliamentary debate participation, significant differences were found for all variables except for communication competence, where less communication apprehension, more argument approach, less argument avoidance, and more willingness to communicate were observed compared to non-debaters. Finally, the study findings revealed that those with parliamentary debate experience obtained lower scores for communication apprehension and higher scores for argumentative approaches compared with those who did not have such experience; the effect sizes were smaller in women than men. These findings suggest that parliamentary debate participation is an effective way to foster communication variables.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46219,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation","volume":"37 1","pages":"91 - 118"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2023-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10503-022-09591-5.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50487054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Fernando Leal and Hubert Marraud: How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell−Copleston Debate Fernando Leal和Hubert Marraud：哲学家如何争论：罗素-科普尔斯顿辩论中的对抗性合作

IF 1.2 2区文学

Argumentation Pub Date : 2023-01-04 DOI: 10.1007/s10503-022-09593-3

Maurice A. Finocchiaro

引用次数: 5