Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal最新文献_第5页

A Socialist Analysis of the Mutual Aid Solidarity During the #EndSARS Protest in Multi-Religious Nigeria. 多元宗教的奈及利亚#EndSARS抗争期间互助团结的社会主义分析

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/ken.2023.a904081

Favour Uroko, Chinyere Nwaoga, Ezichi Ituma

{"title":"A Socialist Analysis of the Mutual Aid Solidarity During the #EndSARS Protest in Multi-Religious Nigeria.","authors":"Favour Uroko, Chinyere Nwaoga, Ezichi Ituma","doi":"10.1353/ken.2023.a904081","DOIUrl":"10.1353/ken.2023.a904081","url":null,"abstract":"This study describes the results of a social analysis of mutual aid solidarity during Nigeria's #EndSARSprotests against Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS) brutality in Nigeria. The results reveal that the protests achieved success with the assistance of mutual aid solidarity networks. Yet there is a dearth of literature exploring the reasons for this accomplishment. Nigeria is a country where everything done usually has a religious coloration and interpretation; however, the 2020 mutual aid solidarity in the #EndSARS protests proved otherwise. Using in-depth interviews, data were elicited from 20 youths, including participants and observers during the #EndSARS mutual aid solidarity protests. Using a phenomenological approach, this study found that the mutual aid support group transcended traditional geopolitical, gender, and religious barriers, and youth and the elderly participated in the protest. Further results show that the 2020 #End-SARS mutual aid solidarity brought about an accountable and transparent civil society, including the financial disbanding of the Nigerian Police Force, the SARS unit responsible for extrajudicial killings. The findings also indicate that Nigerian politicians are the real problem, not religion. Recommendations are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46167,"journal":{"name":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"145-166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48657464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Editor's Note, June 2023. 编者注，2023年6月

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/ken.2023.a904079

Savannah Pearlman, Mark Lance

引用次数: 0

Contributor. 撰稿人

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/ken.2023.a904078

引用次数: 0

Editor's Note March 2023. 编者按2023年3月

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/ken.2023.a899456

引用次数: 0

How Should Urban Climate Change Planning Advance Social Justice? 城市气候变化规划如何促进社会公正?

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/ken.2023.a899459

Bridget Pratt

{"title":"How Should Urban Climate Change Planning Advance Social Justice?","authors":"Bridget Pratt","doi":"10.1353/ken.2023.a899459","DOIUrl":"10.1353/ken.2023.a899459","url":null,"abstract":"Cities are struggling to balance the moral imperatives of sustainable development, with equity and social justice often ignored and negatively impacted by climate change mitigation and adaptation. Yet, the nature of these impacts on social justice has not been comprehensively investigated and little ethical guidance exists on how to better promote social justice in urban climate change planning practice. This article addresses the normative question: How should urban climate change planning advance social justice? It gathers empirical literature documenting the inclusivity and equity impacts of urban climate change planning and thematically analyses that literature for dimensions of social justice drawn from philosophical and urban justice theory. Study findings demonstrate that four characteristics of climate change planning in cities-underlying neoliberal ideology, unequal treatment, green gentrification, and exclusion from decisionmaking-comprise, create, or worsen social injustices across six dimensions. These characteristics are often interconnected and inseparable. Where neoliberal ideology guides urban climate change planning, the other three characteristics frequently occur as well. The article concludes by arguing that, at a minimum, urban planners and climate planners have an obligation of justice to avoid undertaking climate change planning that exhibits any of the four characteristics and to address injustices generated where planning has such characteristics. It further suggests that planners' negative obligations likely extend beyond this because the literature review revealed gaps in existing empirical data on the equity impacts of urban climate change planning.","PeriodicalId":46167,"journal":{"name":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"55-89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41664296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Solidarity Over Charity: Mutual Aid as a Moral Alternative to Effective Altruism. 慈善之上的团结:互助是有效利他主义的道德选择

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/ken.2023.a904082

Savannah Pearlman

{"title":"Solidarity Over Charity: Mutual Aid as a Moral Alternative to Effective Altruism.","authors":"Savannah Pearlman","doi":"10.1353/ken.2023.a904082","DOIUrl":"10.1353/ken.2023.a904082","url":null,"abstract":"Effective Altruism is a popular social movement that encourages individuals to donate to organizations that effectively address humanity's most severe poverty. However, because Effective Altruists are committed to doing the most good in the most effective ways, they often argue that it is wrong to help those nearest to you. In this article, I target a major subset of Effective Altruists who consider it a moral obligation to do the most good possible. Call these Obligation-Oriented Effective Altruists (OOEAs), and their movement Obligation-Oriented Effective Altruism (OOEA). I argue that, insofar as this variety of OOEA seems to commit us to refrain from helping the people right in front of us, there is something intuitively wrong about it. In response, I introduce an alternative model that embraces partiality: Mutual Aid. Mutual Aid is a network of community members, usually from the same geographical region, who share a commitment to offer, receive, and exchange material goods, wealth, and social support. I recommend Mutual Aid as a liberatory model, which-through empathy, solidarity, and care-mobilizes community-building and provides a catalyst for community advocacy. As such, we should resist the claims of OOEAs that partially distributing our funds to people or causes we care about is morally wrong or even less than ideal. We do not have a moral obligation to use our funds \"effectively\"; rather, we have a broader obligation to address human suffering, and Mutual Aid is one moral alternative for discharging this duty.","PeriodicalId":46167,"journal":{"name":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"167-199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47299640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Varieties of Community Uncertainty and Clinical Equipoise. 社区不确定性与临床平衡的多样性

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/ken.2023.a899457

Alex John London, Patrick Bodilly Kane, Jonathan Kimmelman

{"title":"Varieties of Community Uncertainty and Clinical Equipoise.","authors":"Alex John London, Patrick Bodilly Kane, Jonathan Kimmelman","doi":"10.1353/ken.2023.a899457","DOIUrl":"10.1353/ken.2023.a899457","url":null,"abstract":"The judgments of conscientious and informed experts play a central role in two elements of clinical equipoise. The first, and most widely discussed, element involves ensuring that no participant in a randomized trial is allocated to a level of treatment that everyone agrees is substandard. The second, and less often discussed, element involves ensuring that trials are likely to generate social value by producing the information necessary to resolve a clinically meaningful uncertainty or disagreement about the relative merits of a set of interventions. The distribution of judgments in expert communities can take many forms, each with important implications for whether a trial satisfies one or both elements of clinical equipoise. In this article we use a graphical approach to represent three ways in which expert community uncertainty can vary: by spread, modality, and skew. Understanding these different distributions of expert judgment has three important implications: it helps to make operational the requirement of social value, it shows that some conditions for initiating studies to promote social value diverge from common assumptions about clinical equipoise, and it has important implications for how trials should be designed and monitored, and what patients should be told during informed consent.","PeriodicalId":46167,"journal":{"name":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49078519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Mutual Aid as Effective Altruism. 互助是有效的利他主义

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/ken.2023.a904083

Ricky Mouser

引用次数: 0

Contributors 贡献者

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal Pub Date : 2022-11-04 DOI: 10.1353/ken.2022.0013

Remy Debes, Douglas Mackay, M. Barcelos, Laura Guidry-Grimes, David Wendler, Jake Earl, N. Berlinger

引用次数: 0

Almost Over: Aging, Dying, Dead by F.M. Kamm (review) F.M.Kamm的《几乎结束：衰老、死亡》（综述）

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.1353/ken.2022.0021

N. Berlinger

引用次数: 0