International Orthodontics最新文献

{"title":"Comparative assessment of two-phase class II treatment with Activator or Bionator followed by fixed appliances: A retrospective controlled before-and-after study","authors":"Allen Abbing ,&nbsp;Vasiliki Koretsi ,&nbsp;Michael Kalavritinos ,&nbsp;Tim Schröder ,&nbsp;Theodore Eliades ,&nbsp;Spyridon N. Papageorgiou","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100863","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100863","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>Two-phase treatment for children with Class II malocclusion with several functional appliances is still performed by many orthodontists, while the Activator and the Bionator appliances are two of the most popular ones. Aim of this study was to compare the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of treatment with these two appliances.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Class II children treated with Activator or Bionator in the first phase, followed by a phase of fixed appliances were included. Skeletal and dentoalveolar parameters were assessed from lateral cephalograms and analysed with linear regressions at 5%.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 89 patients (mean age 10.0 years; 47% female) were included. During the first phase, Bionator increased less the SNB (difference in mean treatment-induced changes [MD] –0.7°; 95% confidence interval [CI] –1.3 to –0.2°; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01) and decreased less the ANB angle (MD 0.6°; 95% CI 0 to 1.1°; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.03) compared to Activator. Activator slightly increased the facial axis and Bionator reduced it (MD –1.6°; 95% CI –2.3 to –0.8°; <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). Compared to Activator, the Bionator retroclined more the upper incisors (MD –2.4°; 95% CI –4.6 to –0.2°; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.03) and increased more the interincisal angle (MD 2.9°; 95% CI 0.5 to 5.4°; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.02). After the second phase (6.2 years after baseline), the only differences were a reduced facial axis (MD –1.3°; 95% CI –2.2 to –0.3°; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.008) and an increased maxillary rotation (MD 0.9°; 95% CI 0 to 1.8°; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.04) with Bionator compared to Activator.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Similar dentoalveolar effects were seen overall with two-phase treatment with either appliance, with Bionator being associated with more vertical increase compared to Activator.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"22 2","pages":"Article 100863"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1761722724000196/pdfft?md5=aa6c6a549c9746f5683ae40b6b5184c1&pid=1-s2.0-S1761722724000196-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140000326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Alveolar morphometry in young adults with and without agenesis of the upper lateral incisor: A retrospective study","authors":"Jesús Manuel Sánchez-Beltran ,&nbsp;Yalil Augusto Rodríguez-Cárdenas ,&nbsp;Gustavo Armando Ruíz-Mora ,&nbsp;Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo ,&nbsp;Luis Ernesto Arriola-Guillén","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100864","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100864","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>We aimed to compare alveolar morphometry in young adults with agenesis of the upper lateral incisor versus the side without agenesis and versus matched controls.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>In this observational retrospective study, cone beam computed tomography scans were obtained of 36 upper hemiarches from young adults aged 15 to 30 years. The hemiarches were distributed into three groups: group 1: 12 upper hemiarches presenting agenesis of the upper lateral incisor; group 2: 12 upper hemiarches from the opposite side without agenesis of the upper lateral incisor (control group 1); and group 3: 12 upper hemiarches without agenesis of the upper lateral incisor matched for age and sex with respect to the affected group (control group 2). A trained and calibrated investigator performed all the alveolar measurements at two different times, including sagittal, coronal and axial slices of each hemiarch. Paired Student's <em>t</em>-tests, Chi-square and repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction were used, (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Apical mesial evaluation of group 1 (4.22<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.19<!--> <!-->mm) was significantly lower (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) than that of groups 2 (6.72<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.17<!--> <!-->mm) and 3 (7.58<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.67<!--> <!-->mm). Apical distal evaluation also showed differences (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) among the three groups, with the dimension being smaller in group 1 with agenesis (4.53<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.14<!--> <!-->mm), followed by group 2 without agenesis (6.23<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.55<!--> <!-->mm) and the healthy control group 3 (7.73<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.71<!--> <!-->mm).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Lateral incisor agenesis significantly reduces the alveolar dimensions of the affected area. In cases of unilateral agenesis, the unaffected side also shows sequelae, with decreased dimensions compared to cases without agenesis. This condition should be taken into account when making therapeutic decisions regarding rehabilitation with implants or canine replacement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"22 2","pages":"Article 100864"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139975983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Corrigendum to “Comparative study of effect of different lever arm positions and lengths on transverse and vertical bowing in lingual orthodontics - An FEM study” [International Orthodontics 2021;19: 281–290]","authors":"Navraj Mattu ,&nbsp;Aravind M. Virupaksha ,&nbsp;Anup Belludi","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100850","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100850","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"22 2","pages":"Article 100850"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1761722724000068/pdfft?md5=20f7932b0dad4969458595a248e04ac0&pid=1-s2.0-S1761722724000068-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139936754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Acknowledgement to our Reviewers","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S1761-7227(24)00016-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S1761-7227(24)00016-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"22 1","pages":"Article 100860"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1761722724000160/pdfft?md5=567d66511ddb4e0e54965892f38b73fe&pid=1-s2.0-S1761722724000160-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139936633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Non-compliance treatment in a young adult full-step class II division 2 malocclusion with preadjusted lingual appliance and upper first molars extractions","authors":"Enrico Albertini,&nbsp;Paolo Albertini,&nbsp;Anna Colonna,&nbsp;Luca Lombardo","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100848","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100848","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This case report describes a complex full-step class II case in a young adult patient treated with lingual straight-wire appliance and upper first molar extraction. As the patient refused a surgical treatment, she was offered the best possible camouflage with the double aim of obtaining an ideal occlusal relationship and maintaining the profile; appropriate biomechanical strategies, including extraction choice and anchorage control during space closure, were needed to achieve the planned results. This case report demonstrates the possibility of successfully resolving severe sagittal discrepancies in an adult patient without surgical treatment by means of a completely invisible non-compliance technique, with the extraction of the most compromised teeth. This report also underlines the need for careful planning during both diagnostic and treatment phases, in order to obtain the best results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"22 2","pages":"Article 100848"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139901412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Divergence between CBCT and Optical Scans for Soft Tissue Analysis and Cephalometry in Facial Imaging: A cross-sectional study on healthy adults","authors":"Marco Farronato ,&nbsp;Niccolò Cenzato ,&nbsp;Roberta Crispino ,&nbsp;Francesco Carlo Tartaglia ,&nbsp;Roberto Biagi ,&nbsp;Benedetta Baldini ,&nbsp;Cinzia Maspero","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100845","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100845","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Facial soft tissue analysis is becoming increasingly emphasized in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. While traditional cephalometry primarily focuses on hard tissues, recent non-invasive imaging techniques offer the potential to comprehensively evaluate three-dimensional (3D) facial soft tissues. The aim of the study was to establish the geometrical 3D and cephalometric divergence between Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) derived images and scanned soft tissues. Crucial for enhancing orthodontic diagnosis, minimizing patient exposure to ionizing radiation and providing facial cephalometric parameters.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2020 to May 2023. CBCT and 3D facial scans were obtained simultaneously using a specialized imaging system. Reproducible landmark points were selected for both cephalometric and soft tissue analysis. Angular and linear measurements were recorded, and correlations between CT and facial scans were statistically assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Comparisons between 10 CBCT-derived and 10 facial scan-based soft tissue representations resulted into 1.8<!--> <!-->mm mean root median square (RMS). Angular measurements, such as ANB, right gonial angle, and left gonial angle, exhibited a 0.9° of difference with their respective soft tissue variables. In contrast, linear measurements of total anterior facial height showed a lower correlation coefficient, equal to 0.51. The correlation between soft tissues and underlying hard tissues was more pronounced for gonial angles.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Facial soft tissue analysis using either 3D facial scans or CBCT-derived offers similar results for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. These findings support the use of non-invasive diagnostic tools in orthodontics, although further investigations are needed to comprehensively understand the complexity of hard and soft tissue relationships.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"22 2","pages":"Article 100845"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1761722724000020/pdfft?md5=a0a048c773b54f3a3efa34846be3ae32&pid=1-s2.0-S1761722724000020-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139719520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The flexural strength of orthodontic acrylic resin containing resveratrol nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: An in vitro study","authors":"Rashin Bahrami ,&nbsp;Fateme Gharibpour ,&nbsp;Maryam Pourhajibagher ,&nbsp;Abbas Bahador","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100846","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100846","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate how the addition of resveratrol nanoparticles (RNPs), which act as an antimicrobial agent, affects the strength of acrylic resin used in orthodontics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>According to ISO 20795-1-2013, 76 cold cure acrylic resin samples (65<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->10<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->3.3<!--> <!-->mm) were prepared. The samples were divided into four groups (19 samples in each group) based on RN concentrations added to 1<!--> <!-->mL acrylic monomer (0 for control, 256, 512, and 1024<!--> <!-->μg/mL). Flexural strength was assessed in megapascal (MPa) using a universal testing machine. Data analysis involved nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance and pairwise post-hoc Dunn's test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The flexural strength decreased as the concentration of RNPs increased, with the lowest value observed at 1024<!--> <!-->μg/mL (63.06<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5.33<!--> <!-->MPa). The control group exhibited the highest mean of flexural strength (88.43<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.41<!--> <!-->MPa), followed by the groups with RNPs at the concentrations of 256<!--> <!-->μg/mL (82.69<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.41<!--> <!-->MPa) and 512<!--> <!-->μg/mL (76.02<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.59<!--> <!-->MPa).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In conclusion, the addition of RNs to orthodontic acrylic resin had a dose-dependent impact on its flexural strength. Based on the findings, we recommend incorporating RNs at a concentration of 256<!--> <!-->μg/mL as an antimicrobial agent in orthodontic acrylic resin. However, further research is necessary to assess the long-term effects and clinical applications of this approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"22 2","pages":"Article 100846"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139714848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Class II subdivision treatment and stability with asymmetric Herbst appliance: A case report","authors":"Diego Coelho Lorenzoni ,&nbsp;Olívia Thomaz de Almeida Monteiro Barbosa,&nbsp;Adriana de Alcantara Cury-Saramago,&nbsp;Cláudia Trindade Mattos","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100838","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100838","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Non-surgical treatment of Class II subdivision may involve complex mechanics or asymmetric tooth extraction in its resolution. This report demonstrates the result and the short-term stability of Class II subdivision treated with asymmetrically installed </span>Herbst appliance followed by conventional fixed </span>orthodontic appliance. The approach allowed the correction of the unilateral Class II molar relationship and increased </span>overjet, as well as the deviation of dental midlines, with improvement in lip posture and facial profile. The results remained stable two years after treatment, confirming the treatment success.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"22 2","pages":"Article 100838"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139643059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"André Horn","authors":"Laure Frapier","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100844","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100844","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"22 1","pages":"Article 100844"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1761722724000019/pdfft?md5=e772c803fb9ad55edbc011ec3ce30e6d&pid=1-s2.0-S1761722724000019-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139543186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Usage of temporary anchorage devices: A cross-cultural and cross-sectional survey of orthodontists in Australia and the UK","authors":"Julian Woolley ,&nbsp;Natasha Wright ,&nbsp;Maurice J. Meade","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100843","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100843","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Detailed insight regarding the use of temporary anchorage devices (TAD) in Australia and the United Kingdom (UK) is lacking. The primary aim of the present cross-sectional survey was to investigate TAD usage among UK-based and Australian-based orthodontists. The secondary objectives were to compare TAD-related preferences and protocols between orthodontists in the two countries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A pilot-tested electronic questionnaire was distributed to members of the British Orthodontic<span> Society and the Australian Society of Orthodontists. Questions pertained to their demographic details, and current use of TADs including protocols, treatment objectives and factors influencing their use.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>A total of 192 responses were recorded (Australia: 122; UK: 70). One hundred and forty-two respondents (74.0%) reported using TADs as part of their orthodontic treatment, 77.0% in Australia (</span><em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->94) and 68.6% in the UK (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->48). Molar protraction was the most common procedure for which TADs were reportedly used (Australia: <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->118; 87.2%, UK: <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->36; 75.0%). “Loosening” was the most prevalent reported complication overall (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->124; 90.1%). “Confidence”, “insufficient postgraduate education” and “availability of equipment” were the factors that most influenced the decision not to provide TADs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Most orthodontists in both countries provided TADs. TAD protocols of orthodontists in both countries were reported. Similarities and differences regarding TAD-related clinical practices and procedures, complications and factors influencing the use of TADs and reasons for not using TADs were explored. Information from the present study can provide baseline data for future related studies in each country and for comparison of TAD usage in other countries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"22 2","pages":"Article 100843"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139503923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}