{"title":"An Interview with Manuel Muñoz","authors":"Rafael Pérez-Torres","doi":"10.3368/cl.62.3.279","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3368/cl.62.3.279","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44998,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69590570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Index to Volumes 61 and 62","authors":"","doi":"10.3368/cl.62.4.607","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3368/cl.62.4.607","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44998,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69590591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Radical Conservatism of Black Rural Literature","authors":"Mitchum Huehls","doi":"10.3368/cl.61.4.431","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3368/cl.61.4.431","url":null,"abstract":"n 2015, Picador published Paul Beatty’s The Sellout, a very funny novel about a black man in Los Angeles who achieves the liberal goals of the civil rights movement (racial justice, equality, and freedom) through distinctly illiberal means (reinstituting segregation in his community). A crucial component of this project―lifting up by selling out―involves the protagonist’s embrace of a rural, agricultural lifestyle in the middle of an urban metropolis. That is, he is marked as a race traitor at least in part because, as he readily acknowledges, his commitment to farming appears to endorse Booker T. Washington’s infamous call to previously enslaved blacks and their progeny: “Cast down your bucket where you are” (The Sellout 35). When Washington used that phrase in his famous Atlanta Compromise speech of 1895, “where you are” was often the very farms and fields of a Southern agrarian economy predicated on centuries of slavery. But such compromise doesn’t bother the Sellout, who rides on horseback down city streets, profits from the two crops that have the most “cultural relevance” to him (“watermelon and weed” [62]), and uses horticultural logic to justify racial segregation: “I’m a farmer: we segregate in an effort to give every tree, every plant, every poor Mexican, every poor nigger, a chance for equal access to sunlight and water; we make sure every living organism has room to breathe” (214). M I T C H U M H U E H L S","PeriodicalId":44998,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE","volume":"61 1","pages":"431 - 459"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45019382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Thinking the Anthropocene South","authors":"M. Samuelson","doi":"10.3368/cl.61.4.537","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3368/cl.61.4.537","url":null,"abstract":"nthropocene” is shorthand for a story that implicates the human species in the climate crisis and other planetary ills. Grafting humanity into the geological time scale, this story has a shock value that is presumably meant to move “us” into more sustainable ways of living. But it fails to register the markedly different ways in which the “we” that it evokes are situated in relation to the imperiled planet and to one another. There has thus been a proliferating nomenclature through which critics of the term have sought to encode other narratives for our times. Some of these narratives are stories that would assign responsibility to particular practices or groups―such as capitalism, the plantation economy, or the Anglosphere―rather than to humanity as a whole. Others register epistemological or ontological bias in how the derangement of the Earth system and the degradation of environments are being thought and experienced or propose alternative ways of understanding and living through these conditions. One such term is “Northropocene.” Mentioned in M E G S A M U E L S O N","PeriodicalId":44998,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE","volume":"61 1","pages":"537 - 549"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46077542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Disenchanting Technoliberalism","authors":"J. Schnepf","doi":"10.3368/cl.61.4.530","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3368/cl.61.4.530","url":null,"abstract":"n a recent issue of PMLA, Wai Chee Dimock’s Editor’s Column, entitled “AI and the Humanities,” refers to two distinct paths for the artificial intelligence of the future: “How can we create algorithms that would complement rather than replace human beings, help rather than destroy us?” she asks.1 Dimock prefaces these alternatives with PMLA’s readership in mind, citing studies that warn “those ‘with graduate or professional degrees will be almost four times as exposed to AI as workers with just a high school degree’” and that the advent of new AI will “[hit] educated workers the hardest.”2 What “exposure” to AI might mean for literary scholars practically is never specified but the implication is that impending automation poses yet another threat to knowledge workers in literature programs who already find their material livelihoods jeopardized by the crises of defunding and adjunctification. To adapt, Dimock intimates that scholars of literature might enter into interdisciplinary arrangements with the computer scientists and engineers who have a hand in AI design. She observes that Stanford’s Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, for example, now counts English professors among its faculty. In","PeriodicalId":44998,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE","volume":"61 1","pages":"530 - 536"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46496915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}