{"title":"The preferable position for quantifying left ventricular diameter by transthoracic echocardiography.","authors":"Takafumi Nakayama, Yasuhiro Shintani, Masashi Yokoi, Toshihiko Goto, Yukako Oishi, Noriyuki Ikehara, Masato Sugiura, Kengo Ohta, Hiroya Hashimoto, Kazuhiro Yajima, Yoshihiro Seo","doi":"10.1007/s12574-024-00658-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-024-00658-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In quantifying left ventricular (LV) diameter, which position for echocardiographic measurements, mitral valve tip level (MV-tip) or LV mid level (LV-mid), more accurately represents the LV volume is unclear. Furthermore, which factor affects the measurement error also has not been elucidated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 150 patients without myocardial infarction and local asynergy who underwent echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI). Echocardiographic LV diastolic diameter (LVDD) and LV systolic diameter (LVDS) were measured at both MV-tip and LV-mid, and the LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and end-systolic volume (LVESV) were quantified using CMRI. We quantified the degree of aortic wedging as the angle between the anterior wall of the aorta and the ventricular septal surface (ASA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average LVDD was smaller and average LVDS larger when measured at the MV-tip than at the LV-mid. In regression analyses, the correlation coefficient between LVDD and LVEDV was larger at LV-mid (R = 0.89) than at MV-tip (R = 0.82), and the correlation coefficient between LVDS and LVESV also larger at LV-mid (R = 0.93) than MV-tip (R = 0.87). ASA, Valsalva diameter, left atrial diameter, patient height, and LV mass significantly affected the echocardiographic measurement error, but no factor affected the measurement error when quantifying LVDD at the LV-mid level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The echocardiographic LV diameter measured at LV-mid has a stronger correlation with LV chamber size derived from CMRI than measurements at MV-tip. The LVDD measured at the LV-mid level is not affected by other factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":44837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Echocardiography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142113199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Mass-like lesion in the ascending aorta by side lobe and beam width artifacts.","authors":"Shuhei Aoki, Ryohei Ono, Hiroyuki Takaoka, Noriko Suzuki-Eguchi, Togo Iwahana, Yoshio Kobayashi","doi":"10.1007/s12574-023-00632-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12574-023-00632-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Echocardiography","volume":" ","pages":"183-184"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138832130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nobuichiro Yagi, Mana Ogawa, Ken Kuwajima, Hiroko Hasegawa, Takafumi Yamane, Takahiro Shiota
{"title":"Impact of stroke volume assessment by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography on the classification of low-gradient aortic stenosis.","authors":"Nobuichiro Yagi, Mana Ogawa, Ken Kuwajima, Hiroko Hasegawa, Takafumi Yamane, Takahiro Shiota","doi":"10.1007/s12574-023-00638-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12574-023-00638-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate assessment of flow status is crucial in low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS). However, the clinical implication of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3DTEE) on flow status evaluation remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the assessment of flow status using 3D TEE in low-gradient AS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with low-gradient AS and preserved ejection fraction at our institution between 2019 and 2022. Patients were categorized into low-flow/low-gradient (LF-LG) AS or normal-flow/low-gradient (NF-LG) AS based on two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (2DTTE). We compared the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) geometry between the two groups and reclassified them using stroke volume index (SVi) obtained by 3DTEE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 173 patients (105 with LF-LG AS and 68 with NF-LG AS), 54 propensity-matched pairs of patients were analyzed. 3DTEE-derived ellipticity index of LVOT was significantly higher in LF-LG AS patients compared to NF-LG AS patients (p = 0.012). We assessed the discordance in flow status classification between SVi<sub>2DTTE</sub> and SVi<sub>3DTEE</sub> in both groups using a cutoff value of 35 ml/m<sup>2</sup>. The LF-LG AS group exhibited a significantly higher discordance rate compared to the NF-LG AS group, with rates of 50% and 2%, respectively. The optimal cutoff values of SVi<sub>3DTEE</sub> for identifying low flow status, based on 2DTTE-derived cutoff values, were determined to be 43 ml/m<sup>2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LVOT ellipticity in low-gradient AS patients varies depending on flow status, and this difference contributes to discrepancies between SVi<sub>3DTEE</sub> and SVi<sub>2DTTE</sub>, particularly in LF-LG AS patients. Utilizing SVi<sub>3DTEE</sub> is valuable for accurately assessing flow status.</p>","PeriodicalId":44837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Echocardiography","volume":" ","pages":"152-161"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139651878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yukina Hirata, Yuka Nomura, Yoshihito Saijo, Masataka Sata, Kenya Kusunose
{"title":"Reducing echocardiographic examination time through routine use of fully automated software: a comparative study of measurement and report creation time.","authors":"Yukina Hirata, Yuka Nomura, Yoshihito Saijo, Masataka Sata, Kenya Kusunose","doi":"10.1007/s12574-023-00636-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12574-023-00636-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Manual interpretation of echocardiographic data is time-consuming and operator-dependent. With the advent of artificial intelligence (AI), there is a growing interest in its potential to streamline echocardiographic interpretation and reduce variability. This study aimed to compare the time taken for measurements by AI to that by human experts after converting the acquired dynamic images into DICOM data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three consecutive patients were examined by a single operator, with varying image quality and different medical conditions. Echocardiographic parameters were independently evaluated by human expert using the manual method and the fully automated US2.ai software. The automated processes facilitated by the US2.ai software encompass real-time processing of 2D and Doppler data, measurement of clinically important variables (such as LV function and geometry), automated parameter assessment, and report generation with findings and comments aligned with guidelines. We assessed the duration required for echocardiographic measurements and report creation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AI significantly reduced the measurement time compared to the manual method (159 ± 66 vs. 325 ± 94 s, p < 0.01). In the report creation step, AI was also significantly faster compared to the manual method (71 ± 39 vs. 429 ± 128 s, p < 0.01). The incorporation of AI into echocardiographic analysis led to a 70% reduction in measurement and report creation time compared to manual methods. In cases with fair or poor image quality, AI required more corrections and extended measurement time than in cases of good image quality. Report creation time was longer in cases with increased report complexity due to human confirmation of AI-generated findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This fully automated software has the potential to serve as an efficient tool for echocardiographic analysis, offering results that enhance clinical workflow by providing rapid, zero-click reports, thereby adding significant value.</p>","PeriodicalId":44837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Echocardiography","volume":" ","pages":"162-170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11343801/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139681725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Roman Komorovsky, Volodymyr Moroz, Sofia Masliy, Tamila Palamar, Tetiana Holovata, Iryna Dovha, Svitlana Smiyan
{"title":"Right atrial myxoma attached to the roof of the right atrium.","authors":"Roman Komorovsky, Volodymyr Moroz, Sofia Masliy, Tamila Palamar, Tetiana Holovata, Iryna Dovha, Svitlana Smiyan","doi":"10.1007/s12574-023-00628-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12574-023-00628-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Echocardiography","volume":" ","pages":"177-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41166680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Guidance for performance, utilization, and education of cardiac and lung point-of-care ultrasonography from the Japanese Society of Echocardiography.","authors":"Hirotsugu Yamada, Takahiro Ohara, Yukio Abe, Hiroyuki Iwano, Tetsuari Onishi, Kenichi Katabami, Kiyohiro Takigiku, Akira Tada, Hayato Tanigushi, Hirotsugu Mihara, Takeshi Yamamoto, Ken Maeda, Yasuaki Wada","doi":"10.1007/s12574-024-00649-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12574-024-00649-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, bedside ultrasound examinations have been used in many clinical departments and are called point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). Regarding POCUS in the cardiac field, a protocol called focus (focused) cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) has been developed in Europe and the United States, is being used clinically, and an educational syllabus has been created. According to them, FoCUS is defined as a point-of-care cardiac ultrasound examination using standardized limited sections and protocols. FoCUS is primarily intended to be performed by non-cardiologists, and in order to avoid making mistakes in judgment, it is important to be familiar with its limitations and it is necessary to understand pathological conditions that can only be diagnosed using conventional comprehensive echocardiography. The Japanese Society of Echocardiography has edited this clinical guideline because we believe that FoCUS should be used effectively and appropriately in Japan, and that appropriate education is essential to popularize FoCUS in Japan. Furthermore, lung POCUS has recently come into clinical use. Lung POCUS is useful for the diagnosis and follow-up of heart failure when used in conjunction with FoCUS, and is especially useful in primary care where chest X-rays are not available. The working group that created this manual agreed that it is desirable to educate patients about lung POCUS in conjunction with FoCUS, so we decided to include the basic techniques of lung POCUS and how to use them in this manuscript.</p>","PeriodicalId":44837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Echocardiography","volume":" ","pages":"113-151"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140898470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vianney Tedjamulia, Amiliana Mardiani Soesanto, Meryanne E Sinulingga, Isabelle D Lestadi
{"title":"Rare case of primary intra-cardiac myxosarcoma with left ventricular outflow and inflow obstruction.","authors":"Vianney Tedjamulia, Amiliana Mardiani Soesanto, Meryanne E Sinulingga, Isabelle D Lestadi","doi":"10.1007/s12574-023-00631-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12574-023-00631-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Echocardiography","volume":" ","pages":"181-182"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138832131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}