Akira Hachiya, Kiyohiro Takigiku, Yuma Shibuya, Kosuke Yonehara, Yohei Akazawa, Kohta Takei, Ai Kojima, Takeshi Konuma
{"title":"Usefulness of the \"En face view\" method for diagnosing perimembranous ventricular septal defects.","authors":"Akira Hachiya, Kiyohiro Takigiku, Yuma Shibuya, Kosuke Yonehara, Yohei Akazawa, Kohta Takei, Ai Kojima, Takeshi Konuma","doi":"10.1007/s12574-024-00678-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perimembranous ventricular septal defect (VSD) can be classified as having trabecular, inlet, or outlet extension. The surgical approach used in patch closure depends on the which valve of the tricuspid valve to suture around and the avoidance of the specialized conducting system. This retrospective study evaluated the usefulness of the \"En face view\" method for classifying perimembranous VSD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We divided 147 patients with perimembranous VSD into one group of 52 patients diagnosed using the Helmcke et al. method until 2001 and another group of 95 patients diagnosed by the En face view method and conventional method from 2002. A definitive diagnosis was made intraoperatively for patients in whom the extension of the defect was examined using the En face view method during preoperative echocardiography. When the VSD extended towards the anterior leaflet from the commissure between the antero-septal commissure, it was considered outlet extension, and when it extended towards the septal leaflet, it was judged as inlet extension.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 52 patients in whom extension direction was diagnosed until 2001, the number of correct diagnoses was 39 (75.0%). Among the 95 patients who were diagnosed using En face view, a correct diagnosis was made in 84 (88.4%) patients (P = 0.035 vs. before En face view).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>En face view allows the tricuspid valve to be visualized from the front, making it possible to accurately estimate the position of the perimembranous VSD and the positional relationship with the antero-septal commissure.</p>","PeriodicalId":44837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Echocardiography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Echocardiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-024-00678-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Perimembranous ventricular septal defect (VSD) can be classified as having trabecular, inlet, or outlet extension. The surgical approach used in patch closure depends on the which valve of the tricuspid valve to suture around and the avoidance of the specialized conducting system. This retrospective study evaluated the usefulness of the "En face view" method for classifying perimembranous VSD.
Methods: We divided 147 patients with perimembranous VSD into one group of 52 patients diagnosed using the Helmcke et al. method until 2001 and another group of 95 patients diagnosed by the En face view method and conventional method from 2002. A definitive diagnosis was made intraoperatively for patients in whom the extension of the defect was examined using the En face view method during preoperative echocardiography. When the VSD extended towards the anterior leaflet from the commissure between the antero-septal commissure, it was considered outlet extension, and when it extended towards the septal leaflet, it was judged as inlet extension.
Results: Of the 52 patients in whom extension direction was diagnosed until 2001, the number of correct diagnoses was 39 (75.0%). Among the 95 patients who were diagnosed using En face view, a correct diagnosis was made in 84 (88.4%) patients (P = 0.035 vs. before En face view).
Conclusions: En face view allows the tricuspid valve to be visualized from the front, making it possible to accurately estimate the position of the perimembranous VSD and the positional relationship with the antero-septal commissure.
背景:膜周室间隔缺损(VSD)可分为小梁延伸、进气道延伸或出口延伸。补片闭合的手术入路取决于缝合三尖瓣的哪个瓣膜以及避免使用专门的传导系统。本回顾性研究评估了“En face view”方法对膜周VSD分类的有效性。方法:我们将147例膜周室间隔缺损患者分为两组:2001年以前采用Helmcke等方法诊断的患者52例,2002年以后采用En face view法和常规方法诊断的患者95例。在术前超声心动图中使用En face view方法检查缺损的扩展的患者,术中做出明确的诊断。当VSD从室间隔前连接向前小叶延伸时,视为出口延伸,当VSD向室间隔小叶延伸时,视为进口延伸。结果:截至2001年,52例患者中,正确诊断39例(75.0%)。在使用En face view诊断的95例患者中,84例(88.4%)患者诊断正确(P = 0.035)。结论:正面视图可以从正面看到三尖瓣,可以准确估计膜周VSD的位置以及与前间隔连接的位置关系。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Echocardiography, the official journal of the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, publishes work that contributes to progress in the field and articles in clinical research as well, seeking to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all who are concerned with this discipline. The journal welcomes original investigations, review articles, letters to the editor, editorials, and case image in cardiovascular ultrasound, which will be reviewed by the editorial board. The Journal of Echocardiography provides the best of up-to-date information from around the world, presenting readers with high-impact, original work focusing on pivotal issues.