ARCHIV FUR GESCHICHTE DER PHILOSOPHIE最新文献_第3页

Aristotle on Perception and Perception-like Appearance: De Anima 3.3, 428b10–29a9 亚里士多德论知觉和类知觉的表象:《论动物》3.3,428b10-29a9

IF 0.4 2区哲学

ARCHIV FUR GESCHICHTE DER PHILOSOPHIE Pub Date : 2023-03-31 DOI: 10.1515/agph-2021-0139

Evan Keeling

引用次数: 0

Katharina Kraus, Kant on Self-Knowledge and Self-Formation: The Nature of Inner Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2021, xiii + 306 pp. 凯瑟琳克劳斯，康德关于自我认识和自我形成：内在经验的本质。剑桥：剑桥大学出版社2021，xiii+306页。

IF 0.4 2区哲学

ARCHIV FUR GESCHICHTE DER PHILOSOPHIE Pub Date : 2023-03-29 DOI: 10.1515/agph-2022-0002

Yibin Liang

引用次数: 0

Kant on Civil Self-Sufficiency 康德论公民自给自足

IF 0.4 2区哲学

ARCHIV FUR GESCHICHTE DER PHILOSOPHIE Pub Date : 2023-03-13 DOI: 10.1515/agph-2020-0030

Luke J. Davies

引用次数: 3

Titelseiten 头版

2区哲学

ARCHIV FUR GESCHICHTE DER PHILOSOPHIE Pub Date : 2023-03-13 DOI: 10.1515/agph-2023-frontmatter1

引用次数: 0

Muratori, Cecilia. Renaissance Vegetarianism: The Philosophical Afterlives of Porphyry’s On Abstinence. Cambridge: Legenda 2020, xiv + 276 pp. Muratori,塞西莉亚。文艺复兴时期的素食主义:波菲利《禁欲论》的哲学余波。剑桥:Legenda 2020, 14 + 276页。

IF 0.4 2区哲学

ARCHIV FUR GESCHICHTE DER PHILOSOPHIE Pub Date : 2023-03-11 DOI: 10.1515/agph-2023-0003

P. Adamson

引用次数: 0

Abazari, Arash. Hegel’s Ontology of Power: The Structure of Social Domination in Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2020, xvii + 218 pp. Abazari,乔。黑格尔的权力本体论:资本主义社会统治的结构。剑桥:剑桥大学出版社2020年，17 + 218页。

IF 0.4 2区哲学

ARCHIV FUR GESCHICHTE DER PHILOSOPHIE Pub Date : 2023-03-11 DOI: 10.1515/agph-2023-0004

Bernardo Ferro

引用次数: 0

Philosopher-King on a Leash: Combining Plato’s Republic, Statesman and Laws in the Justinianic Dialogue On Political Science 《叶上的哲学家之王》：柏拉图的共和国、政治家与法律在查士丁尼政治学对话中的结合

IF 0.4 2区哲学

ARCHIV FUR GESCHICHTE DER PHILOSOPHIE Pub Date : 2022-10-20 DOI: 10.1515/agph-2021-0168

René de Nicolay

{"title":"Philosopher-King on a Leash: Combining Plato’s Republic, Statesman and Laws in the Justinianic Dialogue On Political Science","authors":"René de Nicolay","doi":"10.1515/agph-2021-0168","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2021-0168","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Late antique political Platonism was not unoriginal in its thought. The paper takes as an example the Justinianic dialogue On Political Science (ca. 550), which creatively engages with Plato’s political works. It shows that the dialogue tries – and manages, as I argue – to combine two apparently inconsistent Platonic models: what I call the “divine” model, in which a philosopher-king endowed with divine knowledge rules unhindered by civic laws; and the “human” model, characterized by the rule of law. The divine model comes mostly from Plato’s Republic and Statesman; the human one, from the Laws. On Political Science demonstrates that its (anonymous) author was acquainted with these three Platonic texts, in addition to other texts. That is philologically noteworthy, but also philosophically interesting: the dialogue manages to integrate the two models into a common framework. It puts forward an original political model, in which a philosopher-king, although endowed with divine knowledge, still has to be bound by civic laws because of his human frailty. The article concludes by discussing the polemical import the dialogue could have had in its Justinianic context.","PeriodicalId":44741,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIV FUR GESCHICHTE DER PHILOSOPHIE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41954021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

On the Megarians of Metaphysics IX 3 论《形而上学》的巨制(九

IF 0.4 2区哲学

ARCHIV FUR GESCHICHTE DER PHILOSOPHIE Pub Date : 2022-10-08 DOI: 10.1515/agph-2021-0086

Santiago Chame

引用次数: 0

Kant’s Account of Epistemic Normativity 康德对认识规范性的阐释

IF 0.4 2区哲学

ARCHIV FUR GESCHICHTE DER PHILOSOPHIE Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI: 10.1515/agph-2021-0058

Reza Hadisi

{"title":"Kant’s Account of Epistemic Normativity","authors":"Reza Hadisi","doi":"10.1515/agph-2021-0058","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2021-0058","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract According to a common interpretation, most explicitly defended by Onora O’Neill and Patricia Kitcher, Kant held that epistemic obligations normatively depend on moral obligations. That is, were a rational agent not bound by any moral obligation, then she would not be bound by any epistemic obligation either. By contrast, in this paper, I argue that, according to Kant, some epistemic obligations are normatively independent from moral obligations, and are indeed normatively absolute. This view, which I call epistemicism, has two parts. First, it claims that in the absence of other kinds of obligations, rational agents would still be bound by these epistemic obligations, i. e., that the latter are normatively independent. Second, it claims that, no matter what other obligations are at stake, rational agents are bound by these epistemic obligations, i. e., the normativity of these epistemic obligations is absolute in that it cannot be undercut by any moral or other sort of obligation. The argument turns on an exploratory reading of Kant’s remarks in “What Is Orientation in Thinking?” (1786) about the maxim of “thinking for oneself” as the “supreme touchstone of truth”. In contrast to O’Neill and Kitcher, I argue that if we interpret this maxim as stating the unifying principle of theoretical and practical reason, then we must interpret it as stating an epistemic, and not merely practical imperative. This result, I argue, vindicates epistemicism and illuminates interesting lessons about Kant’s conception of the category of “epistemic” norms. Further, it helps us make headway with Kant’s enigmatic remarks about the unity of practical and theoretical reason in the Groundwork, the first and second Critiques, and the Lectures on Logic. On my proposal, principles of the practical and theoretical uses of reason are unified through a formal epistemic principle.","PeriodicalId":44741,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIV FUR GESCHICHTE DER PHILOSOPHIE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49514618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Sellars’s Core Critique of C. I. Lewis: Against the Equation of Aboutness with Givenness 塞勒斯对c.i.刘易斯的核心批判:反对关于性与给定性的等式

IF 0.4 2区哲学

ARCHIV FUR GESCHICHTE DER PHILOSOPHIE Pub Date : 2022-09-28 DOI: 10.1515/agph-2021-0114

Griffin Klemick

引用次数: 1