Christopher R. Arnold, Lori Volkman, Carlie James Petrovics
{"title":"Domestic “relations” at the defense department: Toward a framework for concurrent jurisdiction over juveniles","authors":"Christopher R. Arnold, Lori Volkman, Carlie James Petrovics","doi":"10.1111/jfcj.70013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.70013","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Military installations function as complex jurisdictional enclaves where service members' children intermingle with civilian youth, creating a compelling national security interest in clearly defined authority over juvenile justice. This article, an excerpt of a larger corpus of research regarding jurisdictional transfers at military installations, examines the historical development and current challenges of establishing concurrent jurisdiction over juvenile matters on military installations, analyzing the unique classification of juvenile law and its impact on jurisdictional frameworks. Through analysis of federal and state legislation, court decisions, and practical implementation across all 50 states, this research identifies significant gaps in current juvenile justice frameworks on military installations. These ambiguities can result in juvenile cases being dismissed from state courts, even in states with concurrent jurisdiction over criminal matters. The article provides a model framework for establishing comprehensive concurrent juvenile jurisdiction, including specific recommendations for state legislative reform. Key elements include explicit inclusion of juvenile matters in jurisdictional statutes, clear definition of status offenses, precise description of jurisdictional boundaries, and authorization of intergovernmental agreements. This research contributes to ongoing Department of Defense efforts to remove barriers to juvenile justice on military installations while ensuring young people have access to appropriate rehabilitative services through state juvenile justice systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":44632,"journal":{"name":"Juvenile and Family Court Journal","volume":"76 3","pages":"8-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145196264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Bridging the gaps: Addressing barriers for military-connected survivors in the civilian and military court systems","authors":"Kimberly Henry, Ava Ramirez-Ene","doi":"10.1111/jfcj.70010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.70010","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Military-connected survivors of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking (DVSAS) encounter unique challenges that exacerbate trauma experiences as they navigate various support systems, including civilian and military court systems. Jurisdictional mazes, the stigma surrounding trauma-related conditions, and limitations and confusion on the enforcement of protective orders create significant barriers to accessing court systems and, ultimately, legal recourse. This article explores three priority areas for all criminal justice personnel to consider when working with military-connected survivors: unique barriers for military-connected survivors in court systems; PTSD stigma and the misuse of trauma in legal proceedings; and recommendations for education, policy reform, and survivor-centered approaches. Additionally, this article presents key insights from NOVA's Veteran Treatment Court (VTC) report (National Organization for Victim Advocacy, 2025) and listening sessions, illustrating how a deeper understanding of military-connected survivors' needs can enhance collaboration and improve services.</p>","PeriodicalId":44632,"journal":{"name":"Juvenile and Family Court Journal","volume":"76 3","pages":"28-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfcj.70010","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145196265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"In memoriam: Major Evan R. Seamone, LP.D., LL.M., J.D., M.P.P., M.S., U.S. Army, retired (1976–2023)","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/jfcj.70008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.70008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44632,"journal":{"name":"Juvenile and Family Court Journal","volume":"76 3","pages":"4-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145196358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Connecting the dots in military and civilian family courts: Animal abuse's links to other family violence","authors":"Phil Arkow","doi":"10.1111/jfcj.70018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.70018","url":null,"abstract":"<p>An additional form of family violence that frequently is associated with juvenile and intimate partner violence and sexual assault is animal cruelty. While this dynamic is now well researched among civilian populations, it has not as yet been widely addressed in active and retired military communities where unique factors affecting service members, veterans, and their families may exacerbate the risks of interpersonal and interspecies violence. This article describes both the beneficial aspects of human–animal bonds and the adverse impacts of animal abuse among civilian, active, and veteran military service members and their families. It notes the U.S. military's limited responses to acts of animal cruelty and encourages military court judges, Family Advocacy Program centers, military veterinarians, and other stakeholders to gain more insights into both the beneficial aspects of human–animal bonds and the adverse impacts of animal abuse as a potential indicator and predictor of violence against humans. Increased awareness of the link between animal abuse and human violence can be relevant in preventing and responding to intimate partner violence, child maltreatment, and problematic juvenile behaviors in both civilian and military-connected families.</p>","PeriodicalId":44632,"journal":{"name":"Juvenile and Family Court Journal","volume":"76 3","pages":"41-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145196856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Juliette R. Mackin, Lauren Pappacena, Raanan Kagan
{"title":"A mixed methods implementation study of juvenile drug treatment courts","authors":"Juliette R. Mackin, Lauren Pappacena, Raanan Kagan","doi":"10.1111/jfcj.70006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.70006","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Juvenile Drug Treatment Court (JDTC) Guidelines were developed to offer an evidence-based model for providing treatment to youth with substance use disorders who enter the juvenile justice system. A national evaluation was conducted to assess practices used by JDTCs and to test the guidelines. Data include program-level survey data; qualitative, guided discussions with JDTC staff; and court observations. Results reveal wide variation in the practices utilized by sites and their success in implementing the guidelines. These findings support the development of a best practice model for JDTCs to improve youth outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":44632,"journal":{"name":"Juvenile and Family Court Journal","volume":"76 2","pages":"47-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfcj.70006","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144582406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Enhancing state courts’ efforts to address child abuse and neglect: A three-site evaluation of the implementation of the enhanced resource guidelines","authors":"Kristan N. Russell, Marly Zeigler, Moriah Taylor","doi":"10.1111/jfcj.70007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.70007","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Implementing best practices in child welfare court cases is critical to ensuring positive outcomes for youth and families. However, it is also essential that courts are assessed for their fidelity to implement these practices and whether they are having the intended impacts. This article outlines findings from a pre/post evaluation examining the impacts of the implementation of the <i>Enhanced Resource Guidelines</i> (ERGs) in three urban jurisdictions. The findings from this study yield valuable insights regarding the extent to which ERGs implementation positively impacts key outcomes in court practices and case processing. Implications for ongoing practice and future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":44632,"journal":{"name":"Juvenile and Family Court Journal","volume":"76 2","pages":"4-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144582095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Judicial engagement efforts in child welfare courts: A systematic review","authors":"Whitney Howey, Brad W. Lundahl","doi":"10.1111/jfcj.70005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.70005","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This systematic review identified and analyzed literature focused on understanding child welfare judges' efforts to encourage parental engagement in taking steps that would strengthen their family and promote reunification. PRISMA guidelines were followed to identify, screen, and review the literature on judicial practices that promote parental engagement and reduce resistance in child welfare courts. A total of 347 studies were initially screened, with 17 meeting inclusion criteria. Widely agreed upon theoretical propositions on what judges can do to promote parental engagement are missing from the literature, as is research on what works. Furthermore, specific practice guidelines or actionable steps are scant. These gaps could set up a scenario where judicial quality varies because no consensus exists on best practices for engaging families. After reviewing the state of the literature, we offer some suggestions for moving forward, namely, working to establish a model of best practices that borrows from allied professions.</p>","PeriodicalId":44632,"journal":{"name":"Juvenile and Family Court Journal","volume":"76 2","pages":"32-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144582476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"From advocacy to outcomes: A randomized controlled trial of CASA in juvenile justice","authors":"Joseph P. Ryan","doi":"10.1111/jfcj.70004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.70004","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Adolescents involved in the juvenile justice system often experience poor outcomes. Such outcomes include high rates of recidivism and academic difficulties. The current study focused on the effectiveness of mentors and advocates in juvenile justice. Specifically, a diverse group of adolescents on probation was randomly assigned to a control (services as usual) or experimental group (services as usual plus the services of Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA)). The outcomes of primary interest were recidivism within 18 months and changes in self-efficacy. The findings indicate that assignment to the CASA program significantly decreased the probability of recidivism and significantly increased perceptions of academic self-efficacy. No differences were observed in emotional or social self-efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":44632,"journal":{"name":"Juvenile and Family Court Journal","volume":"76 2","pages":"22-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfcj.70004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144581857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Antoine Deliege, Safa Ferchichi, Viktoria Perschler, Joshua Amo-Adjei
{"title":"Beyond detention: Assessing the implementation of diversion for children in conflict with the law in Tunisia","authors":"Antoine Deliege, Safa Ferchichi, Viktoria Perschler, Joshua Amo-Adjei","doi":"10.1111/jfcj.70003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.70003","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines the gap between Tunisia's legal commitment to using detention as a last resort for children in conflict with the law and the reality of its implementation. Despite progressive legislation aligning with international standards, alternative measures remain the exception. Through a qualitative approach involving document analysis, interviews with key stakeholders, and focus group discussions with children, the research explored challenges in implementing non-custodial measures and the impact of detention on child well-being. Findings reveal institutional and financial constraints, judicial attitudes favoring detention, and limited awareness of legal processes among children and parents as barriers to effective implementation. Additionally, detention is found to have detrimental effects on children's physical and mental health, education, and prospects. The study concludes that while Tunisia has a robust legal framework for child rights protection, a reassessment of the juvenile justice system is necessary to address the underutilization of diversion and ensure a rights-respecting approach prioritizing the child's best interests.</p>","PeriodicalId":44632,"journal":{"name":"Juvenile and Family Court Journal","volume":"76 1","pages":"65-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143822102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Challenges and considerations in virtual (remote) parenting plan evaluations: Evaluator experiences and perceptions","authors":"Michael A. Saini","doi":"10.1111/jfcj.70000","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.70000","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to explore parenting plan evaluators' experiences (child custody evaluators) as they adopted virtual (remote) methods for conducting evaluations during the global pandemic. This study used a retrospective cross-sectional design, surveying evaluators at two different points in time to assess their experiences with conducting virtual evaluations. Evaluators were recruited from the roster list of the Office of the Children's Lawyer in Ontario and were asked to complete an online survey at the start of the pandemic (April 2020) and then again 7 months later (November 2020). One hundred sixty-one (<i>n</i> = 161) participants completed the online survey at time 1, and sixty-one (<i>n</i> = 61) at time 2. Most of the participants had received fewer than 5 hours of professional training related to the use of technology before the global pandemic. <i>Findings indicate that while some evaluators adapted to virtual methods, concerns about confidentiality, third-party influence, and rapport building persisted.</i>Several factors impacted the increased confidence in using the technology, including training, supervision, the support provided to the evaluators, and the culture of the family court system that embraced the use of technology during the pandemic. Implications include when evaluators should consider virtual methods, employ a hybrid approach, and when virtual methods may be inappropriate.</p>","PeriodicalId":44632,"journal":{"name":"Juvenile and Family Court Journal","volume":"76 1","pages":"19-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfcj.70000","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143822255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}