儿童福利法院的司法参与工作:系统回顾

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW
Whitney Howey, Brad W. Lundahl
{"title":"儿童福利法院的司法参与工作:系统回顾","authors":"Whitney Howey,&nbsp;Brad W. Lundahl","doi":"10.1111/jfcj.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This systematic review identified and analyzed literature focused on understanding child welfare judges' efforts to encourage parental engagement in taking steps that would strengthen their family and promote reunification. PRISMA guidelines were followed to identify, screen, and review the literature on judicial practices that promote parental engagement and reduce resistance in child welfare courts. A total of 347 studies were initially screened, with 17 meeting inclusion criteria. Widely agreed upon theoretical propositions on what judges can do to promote parental engagement are missing from the literature, as is research on what works. Furthermore, specific practice guidelines or actionable steps are scant. These gaps could set up a scenario where judicial quality varies because no consensus exists on best practices for engaging families. After reviewing the state of the literature, we offer some suggestions for moving forward, namely, working to establish a model of best practices that borrows from allied professions.</p>","PeriodicalId":44632,"journal":{"name":"Juvenile and Family Court Journal","volume":"76 2","pages":"32-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judicial engagement efforts in child welfare courts: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Whitney Howey,&nbsp;Brad W. Lundahl\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jfcj.70005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This systematic review identified and analyzed literature focused on understanding child welfare judges' efforts to encourage parental engagement in taking steps that would strengthen their family and promote reunification. PRISMA guidelines were followed to identify, screen, and review the literature on judicial practices that promote parental engagement and reduce resistance in child welfare courts. A total of 347 studies were initially screened, with 17 meeting inclusion criteria. Widely agreed upon theoretical propositions on what judges can do to promote parental engagement are missing from the literature, as is research on what works. Furthermore, specific practice guidelines or actionable steps are scant. These gaps could set up a scenario where judicial quality varies because no consensus exists on best practices for engaging families. After reviewing the state of the literature, we offer some suggestions for moving forward, namely, working to establish a model of best practices that borrows from allied professions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Juvenile and Family Court Journal\",\"volume\":\"76 2\",\"pages\":\"32-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Juvenile and Family Court Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfcj.70005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juvenile and Family Court Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfcj.70005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇系统的综述发现并分析了关注于理解儿童福利法官努力鼓励父母参与采取措施来加强家庭和促进团聚的文献。遵循PRISMA准则来识别、筛选和审查有关促进父母参与和减少儿童福利法院阻力的司法实践的文献。最初共筛选了347项研究,其中17项符合纳入标准。关于法官可以做些什么来促进父母参与的广泛认同的理论命题在文献中是缺失的,关于什么有效的研究也是如此。此外,缺乏具体的实践指导方针或可操作的步骤。这些差距可能造成司法质量参差不齐的情况,因为没有就家庭参与的最佳做法达成共识。在回顾了文献的现状之后,我们提供了一些向前发展的建议,即,努力建立一个借鉴相关专业的最佳实践模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Judicial engagement efforts in child welfare courts: A systematic review

This systematic review identified and analyzed literature focused on understanding child welfare judges' efforts to encourage parental engagement in taking steps that would strengthen their family and promote reunification. PRISMA guidelines were followed to identify, screen, and review the literature on judicial practices that promote parental engagement and reduce resistance in child welfare courts. A total of 347 studies were initially screened, with 17 meeting inclusion criteria. Widely agreed upon theoretical propositions on what judges can do to promote parental engagement are missing from the literature, as is research on what works. Furthermore, specific practice guidelines or actionable steps are scant. These gaps could set up a scenario where judicial quality varies because no consensus exists on best practices for engaging families. After reviewing the state of the literature, we offer some suggestions for moving forward, namely, working to establish a model of best practices that borrows from allied professions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Juvenile and Family Court Journal, published by the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges since 1949, focuses on issues of interest to the field of juvenile and family justice, including: - child abuse and neglect - juvenile delinquency - domestic violence - substance abuse - child custody and visitation - judicial leadership
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信