Journal of Trust Research最新文献_第9页

Employee perceptions of organisational legitimacy as impersonal bases of organisational trustworthiness and trust 员工对组织合法性的认知是组织可信度和信任的客观基础

IF 1.4

Journal of Trust Research Pub Date : 2017-04-25 DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2017.1304220

Kai Lamertz, Devasheesh P. Bhave

引用次数: 6

Consumers' trust in government institutions and their perception and concern about safety and healthiness of fast food 消费者对政府机构的信任以及对快餐安全健康的认知和关注

IF 1.4

Journal of Trust Research Pub Date : 2017-03-17 DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2017.1289099

R. Omari, G. Ruivenkamp, E. Tetteh

{"title":"Consumers' trust in government institutions and their perception and concern about safety and healthiness of fast food","authors":"R. Omari, G. Ruivenkamp, E. Tetteh","doi":"10.1080/21515581.2017.1289099","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2017.1289099","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Consumers often depend on public institutions to provide safe and healthy food. Thus, trust in these institutions becomes an important consideration for food consumption. The objective was to examine the relationship between consumer trust in relevant government institutions and consumer perception and concern about fast food safety and healthiness. A quantitative approach was used to conduct a cross-sectional consumer survey in 20 fast-food restaurants in Accra, Ghana. Trust was measured by three components (competence, care, and openness). The competence (β = 0.234, p < .05) and openness (β = 0.238, p < .05) components of trust were significant predictors of consumer perception of safety of fast food. Care component of trust was not significant in influencing any of the dependent variables; however, this component positively associated with the competence and openness components implying that when institutions exhibit competence and honesty they are likely to be perceived as being caring about consumers' concerns. To conclude, relevant institutions need to be more competent, open, and caring to protect consumer health and minimise their concerns about fast-food safety and healthiness. These institutions need to build and maintain consumer trust and ensure that restaurateurs comply with food safety and health guidelines.","PeriodicalId":44602,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trust Research","volume":"7 1","pages":"170 - 186"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2017-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21515581.2017.1289099","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44585123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 13

An experimental study of the effects of tattoo genre on perceived trustworthiness: Not all tattoos are created equal 纹身类型对可信度影响的实验研究:并非所有纹身都是一样的

IF 1.4

Journal of Trust Research Pub Date : 2017-03-17 DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2017.1289847

A. Timming, D. Perrett

引用次数: 17

Trust and civic engagement: Evidence from six Latin American cities 信任与公民参与:来自六个拉丁美洲城市的证据

IF 1.4

Journal of Trust Research Pub Date : 2017-02-23 DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2016.1268966

J. Barrios

引用次数: 2

Deterrence-based trust in bargaining: Introducing a new experimental paradigm 议价中基于威慑的信任:引入一个新的实验范式

IF 1.4

Journal of Trust Research Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2016.1254093

Eric van Dijk, Varia Makagonova, Erik W. De Kwaadsteniet, Manon Schutter

引用次数: 4

After the fall: Regulatory focus, trust and negotiators’ responses to a crisis 秋季之后：监管重点、信任和谈判代表对危机的反应

IF 1.4

Journal of Trust Research Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2016.1268057

Plia Vaisman Caspi, Mara Olekalns, D. Druckman

{"title":"After the fall: Regulatory focus, trust and negotiators’ responses to a crisis","authors":"Plia Vaisman Caspi, Mara Olekalns, D. Druckman","doi":"10.1080/21515581.2016.1268057","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2016.1268057","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In two experiments, we evaluated how negotiators’ intra- and interpersonal risk preferences influenced their actions following a crisis during their negotiation. To establish differences in risk preferences, we manipulated negotiators’ regulatory focus (intrapersonal risk) and trust in their opponent (interpersonal risk). In Experiments 1 and 2, we showed that negotiators who were in fit (promotion focus, affect-based trust; prevention focus, cognition-based trust) were more likely to favor the more risky option of continuing to negotiate with a new strategy than negotiators who were not in fit (promotion focus, cognition-based trust; prevention focus, affect-based trust). In E2, we also compared benign and adversarial environments by manipulating trust level (low vs high). Trust level, rather than influencing strategy following a crisis, influenced negotiators’ willingness to take risks to reach agreement: Distance from agreement did not influence negotiators’ willingness to take risks when trust was low but, when trust was high, willingness to take risks increased as distance from agreement increased. Finally, we showed that the importance of reaching a favorable agreement was influenced by both trust level and distance from agreement when negotiators had a promotion focus but not when they had a prevention focus. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":44602,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trust Research","volume":"7 1","pages":"51 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21515581.2016.1268057","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44914485","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 24

Gift giving, reciprocity and the creation of trust 送礼、互惠和建立信任

IF 1.4

Journal of Trust Research Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2017.1286597

M. Mathews

{"title":"Gift giving, reciprocity and the creation of trust","authors":"M. Mathews","doi":"10.1080/21515581.2017.1286597","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2017.1286597","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper examines the role that gift giving plays in supplier–buyer relations, specifically, the role of gift giving and the creation of inter-organisational trust. Repeated inter-organisational exchanges in a mature industrial district are analysed using Mauss’ theoretical framework of gift giving, receiving and counter giving. Actors in embedded network relationships frequently exchange gifts and favours as part of commercial exchanges. This gift giving is a fundamental part of the exchange relationship. Gift giving is found to be instrumental in creating and maintaining relationships, defining group and individual identity and resolving conflicts, thus contributing to the creation of trust between partners. Mauss’ theory of gift giving elaborates how this practise creates the conditions for reciprocity and induces trust. The originality of our findings lies in the fact that despite the dominant ideology of the purely altruistic gift, field research demonstrates that gifts do play a role in modern economic exchanges and that this ancient deeply rooted social custom should not be simply relegated to families, close friends and Christmas, but contributes to explaining the first step of trust and trust creation in repeated exchanges.","PeriodicalId":44602,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trust Research","volume":"7 1","pages":"106 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21515581.2017.1286597","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49579477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

The time for transition: Future trust research 过渡时期：未来信任研究

IF 1.4

Journal of Trust Research Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2017.1293772

P. Li

引用次数: 11

Advancing the scientific understanding of trust in the contexts of negotiations and repeated bargaining 促进对谈判和反复讨价还价背景下信任的科学理解

IF 1.4

Journal of Trust Research Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2017.1289100

D. Kong, Robert B. Lount, Mara Olekalns, D. Ferrin

引用次数: 11

What are the determinants of interpersonal trust in dyadic negotiations? Meta-analytic evidence and implications for future research 二元谈判中人际信任的决定因素是什么?元分析证据及其对未来研究的启示

IF 1.4

Journal of Trust Research Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2017.1285241

S. Lu, D. Kong, D. Ferrin, K. Dirks

{"title":"What are the determinants of interpersonal trust in dyadic negotiations? Meta-analytic evidence and implications for future research","authors":"S. Lu, D. Kong, D. Ferrin, K. Dirks","doi":"10.1080/21515581.2017.1285241","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2017.1285241","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Given the practical importance of interpersonal trust in dyadic negotiations, scholars have increasingly turned their attention to the study of determinants of trust in negotiations. However, research in this area has not been well connected or integrated, which limits the ability of scholars and practitioners to ascertain the state of current scientific knowledge and identify questions for future research. Based on attribution theory and social exchange theory, we present a conceptual framework for understanding how a variety of factors combine to influence the development of interpersonal trust in dyadic negotiations. Then, to verify the conceptual framework, we identified and meta-analysed findings from a total of 25 independent studies of determinants of trust in negotiations. The meta-analyses provided support for two of the three factors in the conceptual framework – trustor attributes and shared attributes – that are likely to influence an individual’s trust in a negotiation partner. The framework and findings provide valuable scientific insights on trust and negotiation, and also valuable practical insights for negotiation practitioners.","PeriodicalId":44602,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trust Research","volume":"7 1","pages":"22 - 50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21515581.2017.1285241","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47059744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 41