Family Medicine and Community Health最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Time to treat the climate and nature crisis as one indivisible global health emergency. 是时候将气候和自然危机视为一个不可分割的全球卫生紧急事件了。
IF 6.1 3区 医学
Family Medicine and Community Health Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2023-002562
Chris Zielinski
{"title":"Time to treat the climate and nature crisis as one indivisible global health emergency.","authors":"Chris Zielinski","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2023-002562","DOIUrl":"10.1136/fmch-2023-002562","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603346/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50163190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Identifying depression and its determinants upon initiating treatment: ChatGPT versus primary care physicians. 在开始治疗时识别抑郁症及其决定因素:ChatGPT与初级保健医生。
IF 6.1 3区 医学
Family Medicine and Community Health Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2023-002391
Inbar Levkovich, Zohar Elyoseph
{"title":"Identifying depression and its determinants upon initiating treatment: ChatGPT versus primary care physicians.","authors":"Inbar Levkovich,&nbsp;Zohar Elyoseph","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2023-002391","DOIUrl":"10.1136/fmch-2023-002391","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare evaluations of depressive episodes and suggested treatment protocols generated by Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT)-3 and ChatGPT-4 with the recommendations of primary care physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Vignettes were input to the ChatGPT interface. These vignettes focused primarily on hypothetical patients with symptoms of depression during initial consultations. The creators of these vignettes meticulously designed eight distinct versions in which they systematically varied patient attributes (sex, socioeconomic status (blue collar worker or white collar worker) and depression severity (mild or severe)). Each variant was subsequently introduced into ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4. Each vignette was repeated 10 times to ensure consistency and reliability of the ChatGPT responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For mild depression, ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 recommended psychotherapy in 95.0% and 97.5% of cases, respectively. Primary care physicians, however, recommended psychotherapy in only 4.3% of cases. For severe cases, ChatGPT favoured an approach that combined psychotherapy, while primary care physicians recommended a combined approach. The pharmacological recommendations of ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 showed a preference for exclusive use of antidepressants (74% and 68%, respectively), in contrast with primary care physicians, who typically recommended a mix of antidepressants and anxiolytics/hypnotics (67.4%). Unlike primary care physicians, ChatGPT showed no gender or socioeconomic biases in its recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 aligned well with accepted guidelines for managing mild and severe depression, without showing the gender or socioeconomic biases observed among primary care physicians. Despite the suggested potential benefit of using atificial intelligence (AI) chatbots like ChatGPT to enhance clinical decision making, further research is needed to refine AI recommendations for severe cases and to consider potential risks and ethical issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6f/f6/fmch-2023-002391.PMC10582915.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41239626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The 2020 US cancer screening deficit and the timing of adults' most recent screen: a population-based cross-sectional study. 2020年美国癌症筛查不足和成年人最近一次筛查的时间:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
IF 6.1 3区 医学
Family Medicine and Community Health Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2022-001893
Jason Semprini, Radhika Ranganathan
{"title":"The 2020 US cancer screening deficit and the timing of adults' most recent screen: a population-based cross-sectional study.","authors":"Jason Semprini,&nbsp;Radhika Ranganathan","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2022-001893","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2022-001893","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In 2020, cancer screenings declined, resulting in a cancer screening deficit. The significance of this deficit, however, has yet to be quantified from a population health perspective. Our study addresses this evidence gap by examining how the pandemic changed the timing of American adults' most recent cancer screen.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We obtained population-based, cancer screening data from the Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020). Mammograms, pap smears and colonoscopies were each specified as a variable of mutually exclusive categories to indicate the timing since the most recent screening (never, 0-1 years, 1-2 years, 3+ years). Our cross-sectional, quasi-experimental design restricts the sample to adults surveyed in January, February or March. We then leverage a quirk in the BRFSS implementation and consider adults surveyed in the second year of the 2020 survey wave as exposed to the COVID-19 pandemic. Respondents surveyed in January 2020-March 2020 were considered unexposed. To estimate the impact of exposure to the COVID-19 pandemic on the timing of recent cancer screenings, we constructed linear and logistic regression models which control for sociodemographic characteristics associated with screening patterns, and state fixed effects and temporal trend fixed effects to control for confounding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2020, the cancer screening deficit was largely due to a 1 year delay among adults who receive annual screening, as the proportion of adults reporting a cancer screen in the past year declined by a nearly identical proportion of adults reporting their most recent cancer screen 1-2 years ago (3%-4% points). However, the relative change was higher for mammograms and pap smears (17%) than colonoscopies (4%). We also found some evidence that the proportion of women reporting never having completed a mammogram declined in 2020, but the mechanisms for this finding should be further explored with the release of future data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our estimates for the pandemic's effect on cancer screening rates are smaller than prior studies. Because we account for temporal trends, we believe prior studies overestimated the effect of the pandemic and underestimated the overall downward trend in cancer screenings across the country leading up to 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/27/af/fmch-2022-001893.PMC10510914.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41154947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
FamilyCoviDD19: results of a cross-sectional study-long-term outcomes of infected and uninfected household members. familycovid - 19:一项横断面研究的结果——感染和未感染家庭成员的长期结果。
IF 6.1 3区 医学
Family Medicine and Community Health Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2022-002057
Theresa S Horst, Jakob P Armann, Maren Doenhardt, Svenja Dreßen, Paula Czyborra, Josephine Schneider, Christin Gano, Alexander Dalpke, Christian Lück, Annet Bluschke, Magdalena Wekenborg, Reinhard Berner, Judith Blankenburg
{"title":"FamilyCoviDD19: results of a cross-sectional study-long-term outcomes of infected and uninfected household members.","authors":"Theresa S Horst,&nbsp;Jakob P Armann,&nbsp;Maren Doenhardt,&nbsp;Svenja Dreßen,&nbsp;Paula Czyborra,&nbsp;Josephine Schneider,&nbsp;Christin Gano,&nbsp;Alexander Dalpke,&nbsp;Christian Lück,&nbsp;Annet Bluschke,&nbsp;Magdalena Wekenborg,&nbsp;Reinhard Berner,&nbsp;Judith Blankenburg","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2022-002057","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2022-002057","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we aimed to compare long-term physical and mental health outcome between SARS-CoV-2 infected and uninfected household members to differentiate between infection-related and pandemic-related outcomes after about two and a half years of the pandemic. Furthermore, possible differences in the outcome of adults and children and young people (CYP) were of interest.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In a cross-sectional study design, we compared the long-term physical and mental health outcome of between infected and uninfected as well as between adult and CYP (household members).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The FamilyCoviDD19 study-a serology study in households-was initially conducted to evaluate virus transmission in a close contact setting focusing on households with children and adolescents in Germany. At least 1 year after initial infection in the respective households, a follow-up took place in which the prevalence and type of possible long-term consequences were surveyed on the basis of self-reported information on physical and mental health.</p><p><strong>Participant: </strong>In this study, a total of 533 household members of 146 families participated and responded to our survey, including 296 (55.5%) adults and 237 (44.5%) CYP.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The difference in frequency of reported symptoms between infected and uninfected individuals was very moderate, suggesting that the vast majority of reported symptoms were not attributable to a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, regardless of age and infection status, this study showed overall high rates of self-reported symptoms with CYP having fewer long-term sequelae than adults one year after infection. Furthermore, over 50% of those reporting symptoms were not affected in their daily life, with CYPs reporting an even lower percentage compared with adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CYP are at reduced risk not only to develop symptomatic infection or severe disease courses (previous analyses) but also to develop infection-associated long-term sequelae (this study). Independent of infection CYP reported high rates of neurocognitive, pain, somatic and mood symptoms, which makes the influence of the pandemic itself-including pandemic control measures-decisive.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/de/54/fmch-2022-002057.PMC10476124.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10595806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Health centres and social determinants of health: an analysis of enabling services provision and clinical quality. 卫生中心和健康的社会决定因素:对提供有利服务和临床质量的分析。
IF 6.1 3区 医学
Family Medicine and Community Health Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2023-002227
Michael Topmiller, Jessica McCann, Hank Hoang, Jennifer Rankin, Jene Grandmont, Molly Pelzer, Alek Sripipatana
{"title":"Health centres and social determinants of health: an analysis of enabling services provision and clinical quality.","authors":"Michael Topmiller,&nbsp;Jessica McCann,&nbsp;Hank Hoang,&nbsp;Jennifer Rankin,&nbsp;Jene Grandmont,&nbsp;Molly Pelzer,&nbsp;Alek Sripipatana","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2023-002227","DOIUrl":"10.1136/fmch-2023-002227","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>It is well known that social determinants of health (SDOH), including poverty, education, transportation and housing, are important predictors of health outcomes. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)-funded health centres serve a patient population with high vulnerability to barriers posed by SDOH and are required to provide services that enable health centre service utilisation and assist patients in navigating barriers to care. This study explores whether health centres with higher percentages of patients using these enabling services experience better clinical performance and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>The analysis uses organisational characteristics, patient demographics and clinical quality measures from HRSA's 2018 Uniform Data System. Health centres (n=875) were sorted into quartiles with quartile 1 (Q1) representing the lowest utilisation of enabling services and quartile 4 (Q4) representing the highest. The researchers calculated a service area social deprivation score weighted by the number of patients for each health centre and used ordinary least squares to create adjusted values for each of the clinical quality process and outcome measures. Analysis of variance was used to test differences across enabling services quartiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjusting for patient characteristics, health centre size and social deprivation, authors found statistically significant differences for all clinical quality process measures across enabling services quartiles, with Q4 health centres performing significantly better than Q1 health centres for several clinical process measures. However, these Q4 health centres performed poorer in outcome measures, including blood pressure and haemoglobin A1c control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings emphasise the importance of how enabling services (eg, translation services, transportation) can address unmet social needs, improve utilisation of health services and reaffirm the challenges inherent in overcoming SDOH to improve health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9b/5b/fmch-2023-002227.PMC10546097.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41113180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Absolute cardiovascular risk assessment by Australian early-career general practitioners: a cross-sectional study. 澳大利亚早期全科医生的绝对心血管风险评估:一项横断面研究。
IF 6.1 3区 医学
Family Medicine and Community Health Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2023-002251
Toby Morgan, Anna Ralston, Andrew Davey, Elizabeth G Holliday, Mark Nelson, Alison Fielding, Mieke van Driel, Amanda Tapley, Dominica Moad, Jean Ball, Jennifer Presser, Neil Spike, Parker Magin
{"title":"Absolute cardiovascular risk assessment by Australian early-career general practitioners: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Toby Morgan,&nbsp;Anna Ralston,&nbsp;Andrew Davey,&nbsp;Elizabeth G Holliday,&nbsp;Mark Nelson,&nbsp;Alison Fielding,&nbsp;Mieke van Driel,&nbsp;Amanda Tapley,&nbsp;Dominica Moad,&nbsp;Jean Ball,&nbsp;Jennifer Presser,&nbsp;Neil Spike,&nbsp;Parker Magin","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2023-002251","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2023-002251","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the prevalence and associations of general practice registrars' performing absolute cardio-vascular risk (ACVR) assessment (ACVRa).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study employing data (2017-2018) from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training project, an ongoing inception cohort study of Australian GP registrars. The outcome measure was whether an ACVRa was performed. Analyses employed univariable and multivariable regression. Analysis was conducted for all patient problems/diagnoses, then for an 'at-risk' population (specific problems/diagnoses for which ACVRa is indicated).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Three GP regional training organisations (RTOs) across three Australian states.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>GP registrars training within participating RTOs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1003 registrars (response rate 96.8%) recorded details of 69 105 problems either with Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait patients aged 35 years and older or with non-Indigenous patients aged 45 years and older. Of these problems/diagnoses, 1721 (2.5% (95% CI 2.4% to 2.6%)) involved an ACVRa. An ACVRa was 'plausibly indicated' in 10 384 problems/diagnoses. Of these, 1228 (11.8% (95% CI 11.2% to 12.4%)) involved ACVRa. For 'all problems/diagnoses', on multivariable analysis female gender was associated with reduced odds of ACVRa (OR 0.61 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.68)). There was some evidence for Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people being more likely to receive ACVRa (OR 1.40 (95% CI 0.94 to 2.08), p=0.10). There were associations with variables related to continuity of care, with reduced odds of ACVRa: if the patient was new to the registrar (OR 0.65 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.75)), new to the practice (OR 0.24 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.38)) or the problem was new (OR 0.68 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.78)); and increased odds if personal follow-up was organised (OR 1.43 (95% CI 1.24 to 1.66)). For 'ACVRa indicated' problems/diagnoses, findings were similar to those for 'all problems/diagnoses'. Association with Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander status, however, was significant at p<0.05 (OR 1.60 (95% CI 1.04 to 2.46)) and association with female gender was attenuated (OR 0.88 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.01)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Continuity of care is associated with registrars assessing ACVR, reinforcing the importance of care continuity in general practice. Registrars' assessment of an individual patient's ACVR is targeted to patients with individual risk factors, but this may entail ACVRa underutilisation in female patients and younger age groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ed/82/fmch-2023-002251.PMC10445344.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10115691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Glycaemic monitoring and control among high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes in Australian general practice during COVID-19. COVID-19 期间澳大利亚全科 2 型糖尿病高危患者的血糖监测和控制。
IF 2.6 3区 医学
Family Medicine and Community Health Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2023-002271
Kirrilee Jane Barlow, Paul P Fahey, Evan Atlantis
{"title":"Glycaemic monitoring and control among high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes in Australian general practice during COVID-19.","authors":"Kirrilee Jane Barlow, Paul P Fahey, Evan Atlantis","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2023-002271","DOIUrl":"10.1136/fmch-2023-002271","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted general practice worldwide, primarily due to public health measures that restricted access to care for chronic diseases, such as type 2 diabetes. These measures disproportionately affected higher risk groups with type 2 diabetes, such as older people and those with obesity. This study aims to identify factors that may have influenced the rates of compliance with testing guidelines and target glycaemic control in Australian general practice settings during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a serial cross-sectional study design of patient record data from general practices representative of the Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District between 2020 and 2022. Aggregated patient records were analysed to determine percentages of subgroups with a blood glycaemic testing interval consistent with guidelines (≥1 within 15 months) and achieving target glycaemic control (by glycated haemoglobin of ≤7%). Linear regression models were used to test the association between independent and dependent variables, and to generate regression coefficients and 95% CI, corrected for time trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the average 14 356 patient records per month, 55% were male, 53% had a body mass index (BMI) <30 and 55% were aged 55-74 years. Compliance to testing guidelines slightly decreased (75-73%) but was positively associated with male sex (2.5%, 95% CI 1.7%, 3.4%), BMI≥30 (9.6%, 95% CI 8.8%, 10.4%) and 55-74 years (7.5%, 95% CI 6.6%, 8.5%) and 75 years and over age groups (7.1%, 95% CI 6.2%, 7.9%). Mean percentage of patient records achieving target glycaemic control slightly increased and was negatively associated with male sex (-3.7%, 95% CI -5.2%, -2.2%), but positively associated with 55-74 years (4.5%, 95% CI 3.8%, 5.1%) and 75 years and over age groups (12.2%, 95% CI 4.5%, 20.0%). Compliance to testing guidelines increased with each additional general practice per 10 000 persons (8.4%, 95% CI 4.9%, 11.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, people with type 2 diabetes in Australia continued to follow glycaemic testing guidelines at the same rate. In fact, there was a slight improvement in glycaemic control among all subgroups of patients, including those at higher risk. These findings are encouraging, but the longer term impact of COVID-19 on type 2 diabetes care is still unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/51/c1/fmch-2023-002271.PMC10423797.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10108878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
It takes two to tango: the recruiter's role in accepting or refusing to participate in group antenatal care among pregnant women-an exploration through in-depth interviews. 探戈需要两个人:招聘人员在接受或拒绝参加孕妇群体产前护理方面的角色——这是通过深入访谈来探索的。
IF 6.1 3区 医学
Family Medicine and Community Health Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2023-002167
Florence Talrich, Astrid Van Damme, Hilde Bastiaens, Marlies Rijnders, Jochen Bergs, Katrien Beeckman
{"title":"It takes two to tango: the recruiter's role in accepting or refusing to participate in group antenatal care among pregnant women-an exploration through in-depth interviews.","authors":"Florence Talrich,&nbsp;Astrid Van Damme,&nbsp;Hilde Bastiaens,&nbsp;Marlies Rijnders,&nbsp;Jochen Bergs,&nbsp;Katrien Beeckman","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2023-002167","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2023-002167","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to explore how women are recruited for group antenatal care (GANC) in primary care organisations (PCOs), what elements influence the behaviour of the recruiter, and what strategies recruiters use to encourage women to participate.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using a qualitative research design, we conducted 10 in-depth interviews with GANC facilitators working in PCOs. Selected constructs of the domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Theoretical Domains Framework helped to develop interview questions and raise awareness of important elements during interviews and thematic analyses. GANC facilitators working in multidisciplinary PCOs located in Brussels and Flanders (Belgium) were invited to participate in an interview. We purposively selected participants because of their role as GANC facilitators and recruiters. We recruited GANC facilitators up until data saturation and no new elements emerged.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>We identified that the recruitment process consists of four phases or actions: identification of needs and potential obstacles for participation; selection of potential participants; recruitment for GANC and reaction to response. Depending on the phase, determinants at the level of the woman, recruiter, organisation or environment have an influence on the recruitment behaviour.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study concludes that it takes two to tango for successful recruitment for GANC. Potential participants' needs and wishes are of importance, but the care providers' behaviour should not be underestimated. Therefore, successful recruitment may be improved when introducing a multidisciplinary recruitment plan consisting of specific strategies, as we suggest.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a0/91/fmch-2023-002167.PMC10357721.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9859704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of associations of household-level and neighbourhood-level poverty markers with paediatric asthma care utilisation by race/ethnicity in an open cohort of community health centre patients. 在一个开放的社区卫生中心患者队列中,按种族/民族划分的家庭和社区贫困标志物与儿科哮喘护理利用率的相关性比较。
IF 6.1 3区 医学
Family Medicine and Community Health Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2022-001760
Jennifer A Lucas, Miguel Marino, Steffani R Bailey, Audree Hsu, Roopradha Datta, Erika Cottrell, Ye Ji Kim, Shakira F Suglia, Andrew Bazemore, John Heintzman
{"title":"Comparison of associations of household-level and neighbourhood-level poverty markers with paediatric asthma care utilisation by race/ethnicity in an open cohort of community health centre patients.","authors":"Jennifer A Lucas,&nbsp;Miguel Marino,&nbsp;Steffani R Bailey,&nbsp;Audree Hsu,&nbsp;Roopradha Datta,&nbsp;Erika Cottrell,&nbsp;Ye Ji Kim,&nbsp;Shakira F Suglia,&nbsp;Andrew Bazemore,&nbsp;John Heintzman","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2022-001760","DOIUrl":"10.1136/fmch-2022-001760","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this research was to examine how different measurements of poverty (household-level and neighborhood-level) were associated with asthma care utilisation outcomes in a community health centre setting among Latino, non-Latino black and non-Latino white children.</p><p><strong>Design, setting and participants: </strong>We used 2012-2017 electronic health record data of an open cohort of children aged <18 years with asthma from the OCHIN, Inc. network. Independent variables included household-level and neighborhood-level poverty using income as a percent of federal poverty level (FPL). Covariate-adjusted generalised estimating equations logistic and negative binomial regression were used to model three outcomes: (1) ≥2 asthma visits/year, (2) albuterol prescription orders and (3) prescription of inhaled corticosteroids over the total study period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The full sample (n=30 196) was 46% Latino, 26% non-Latino black, 31% aged 6-10 years at first clinic visit. Most patients had household FPL <100% (78%), yet more than half lived in a neighbourhood with >200% FPL (55%). Overall, neighbourhood poverty (<100% FPL) was associated with more asthma visits (covariate-adjusted OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.41), and living in a low-income neighbourhood (≥100% to <200% FPL) was associated with more albuterol prescriptions (covariate-adjusted rate ratio 1.07, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.13). When stratified by race/ethnicity, we saw differences in both directions in associations of household/neighbourhood income and care outcomes between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study enhances understanding of measurements of race/ethnicity differences in asthma care utilisation by income, revealing different associations of living in low-income neighbourhoods and households for Latino, non-Latino white and non-Latino black children with asthma. This implies that markers of family and community poverty may both need to be considered when evaluating the association between economic status and healthcare utilisation. Tools to measure both kinds of poverty (family and community) may already exist within clinics, and can both be used to better tailor asthma care and reduce disparities in primary care safety net settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4d/c4/fmch-2022-001760.PMC10391793.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9916062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient aggression towards receptionists in general practice: a systematic review. 病人对全科医生接待员的侵犯:系统性综述。
IF 6.1 3区 医学
Family Medicine and Community Health Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2023-002171
Fiona Willer, David Chua, Lauren Ball
{"title":"Patient aggression towards receptionists in general practice: a systematic review.","authors":"Fiona Willer, David Chua, Lauren Ball","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2023-002171","DOIUrl":"10.1136/fmch-2023-002171","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>General practice receptionists provide an essential function in the healthcare system but routinely encounter acts of incivility and aggression from patients, including hostility, abuse and violence. This study was conducted to summarise what is known about patient-initiated aggression towards general practice receptionists, including impacts on reception staff and existing mitigation strategies.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review with convergent integrated synthesis.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Studies published at any time in English that examine patient aggression experiences of reception staff in primary care settings.</p><p><strong>Information sources: </strong>Searches of five major databases were performed (CINAHL Complete, Scopus, PubMed, Healthcare Administration Database and Google Scholar) to August 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty studies of various designs were included, ranging from the late 1970s to 2022 and originating from five OECD countries. Twelve were assessed as high quality using a validated checklist. Reviewed articles represented 4107 participants; 21.5% were general practice receptionists. All studies reported that displays of aggression towards receptionists by patients were a frequent and routine occurrence in general practice, particularly verbal abuse such as shouting, cursing, accusations of malicious behaviour and use of racist, ablest and sexist insults. Although infrequent, physical violence was widely reported. Inefficient appointment scheduling systems, delayed access to doctors and prescription denial appeared common precipitators. Receptionists adapted their behaviour and demeanour to placate and please patients to avoid escalation of patient frustrations at the cost of their own well-being and clinic productivity. Training in patient aggression management increased receptionist confidence and appeared to decrease negative sequalae. Coordinated support for general practice reception staff who had experienced patient aggression was generally lacking, with a small proportion receiving professional counselling.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient aggression towards reception staff is a serious workplace safety concern for general practices and negatively affects healthcare sector function more broadly. Receptionists in general practice deserve evidence-based measures to improve their working conditions and well-being for their own benefit and that of the community.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Pre-registered in Open Science Framework (osf.io/42p85).</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a3/3d/fmch-2023-002171.PMC10335458.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9802432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信