Insights-The UKSG Journal最新文献_第6页

Increasing visibility and discoverability of scholarly publications with academic search engine optimization 通过学术搜索引擎优化提高学术出版物的可见性和可发现性

IF 1.1

Insights-The UKSG Journal Pub Date : 2021-03-17 DOI: 10.1629/UKSG.534

Lisa Schilhan, Christian Kaier, Karin Lackner

引用次数: 12

Transforming library collections in a pandemic: the perspective from Edge Hill University 大流行时期图书馆馆藏的转变:边山大学的视角

IF 1.1

Insights-The UKSG Journal Pub Date : 2021-03-03 DOI: 10.1629/UKSG.536

Anna França

引用次数: 7

Implementing the Global University Publications Licence: a new open scholarship model for advocating change 实施全球大学出版物许可:倡导变革的新开放奖学金模式

IF 1.1

Insights-The UKSG Journal Pub Date : 2021-02-17 DOI: 10.1629/UKSG.531

Jiafeng Zhou, Kelly Wu, N. Smyth

{"title":"Implementing the Global University Publications Licence: a new open scholarship model for advocating change","authors":"Jiafeng Zhou, Kelly Wu, N. Smyth","doi":"10.1629/UKSG.531","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/UKSG.531","url":null,"abstract":"Universities want a voluntary, non-exclusive licence from authors to disseminate publications. This practitioner case study explores an innovative model to communicate and advance open and equitable scholarship through the implementation of the Global University Publications Licence at the University of Nottingham Ningbo China. This article explains the licensing policy and key influences, including, the copyright law of the People’s Republic of China and the Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). The University approved the Global University Publications Licence, with implementation from 1 August 2019. It is available in Chinese and English. Since implementation, the University has retained rights for 74% of research publications submitted. 100% of those publications are available through the University with a CC-BY licence and zero embargo. The open scholarship model provides an equitable approach to versions and citation. The article concludes by suggesting university libraries can exploit copyright law in China to progress open scholarship strategies, including recognition of employers as authors of works, a priority right to the exploitation of works and an embargo protection of two years after the completion of the work. The author’s final version of publications can be open, discoverable, cited and preserved through trusted universities with global reputations for high-quality research.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44113179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Every nook and cranny: making the library central to research and engagement 每个角落和缝隙:使图书馆成为研究和参与的中心

IF 1.1

Insights-The UKSG Journal Pub Date : 2021-02-03 DOI: 10.1629/UKSG.528

Katherine Stephan

引用次数: 0

Dissemination of Applied Research to the Field: Attitudes and Practices of Faculty Authors in Social Work 应用研究向领域的传播:社会工作教员作者的态度与实践

IF 1.1

Insights-The UKSG Journal Pub Date : 2021-01-26 DOI: 10.1629/UKSG.546

Kimberly Pendell, Ericka Kimball

{"title":"Dissemination of Applied Research to the Field: Attitudes and Practices of Faculty Authors in Social Work","authors":"Kimberly Pendell, Ericka Kimball","doi":"10.1629/UKSG.546","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/UKSG.546","url":null,"abstract":"In applied research disciplines like social work, the disconnect between the production and dissemination of research and the access and use of research in practice becomes very clear. This research/practice divide is particularly problematic for practitioners required to work within evidence-based or research-informed frameworks. To explore this issue, we conducted a nationwide survey and qualitative interviews with social work faculty regarding their research dissemination attitudes and practices, especially to non-academic audiences. The survey and interviews provide data on faculty dissemination methods; gold and green open access; and promotion and tenure considerations. Results demonstrate that faculty are primarily engaged with traditional dissemination methods, and much less engaged with dissemination to non-academic audiences. Faculty are skeptical of open access journals, avoid article processing charges, and are only minimally engaged with institutional repositories. Faculty are conflicted regarding the dissemination of applied research, especially in the context of promotion and tenure. Shifting dissemination to the field would require increased confidence in open access, support for the creation of practitioner focused materials, and reprioritizing impact of research in the field.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74910724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Collaboration across campus: open monograph insights from a library and ‘old’ university press partnership 跨校园合作:来自图书馆和“老”大学出版社合作伙伴关系的开放专著见解

IF 1.1

Insights-The UKSG Journal Pub Date : 2021-01-20 DOI: 10.1629/UKSG.533

S. Barake, A. Welsby

{"title":"Collaboration across campus: open monograph insights from a library and ‘old’ university press partnership","authors":"S. Barake, A. Welsby","doi":"10.1629/UKSG.533","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/UKSG.533","url":null,"abstract":"Liverpool University Press and the University of Liverpool Library collaborated to publish two open access monographs to gain insights into each other’s processes and requirements, and improve the guidance provided to researchers and authors. Lessons learned include researchers’ knowledge of publishing and open access, the monograph publishing process and costs involved, licences and third-party content and the marketing and discoverability of open monographs. Researchers, particularly those at the start of their career, may not have much knowledge and experience of publishing and so it is important for publishers to be as transparent as possible about the processes involved, and for libraries to ensure they are providing sufficient guidance. Knowledge about publishers’ processes and costs allows libraries to have a better understanding about what is reasonable to expect and for researchers to better plan costs for funding applications. Transparency from publishers about the types of costs involved, as well as a greater understanding of the financial requirements of libraries and their institutions, will allow publishers to plan their marketing of open monographs more effectively. The project demonstrated that collaboration between libraries and publishers can be extremely valuable and beneficial to both.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48260343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Discovery is the researcher’s dream 发现是研究者的梦想

IF 1.1

Insights-The UKSG Journal Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.571

Magaly Bascones, Rebekah Cummings

引用次数: 0

The Plan S Rights Retention Strategy is an administrative and legal burden, not a sustainable open access solution S计划的权利保留策略是一个行政和法律负担，而不是一个可持续的开放获取解决方案

IF 1.1

Insights-The UKSG Journal Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.556

S. Khoo

{"title":"The Plan S Rights Retention Strategy is an administrative and legal burden, not a sustainable open access solution","authors":"S. Khoo","doi":"10.1629/uksg.556","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.556","url":null,"abstract":"to inform publishers that the author accepted manuscript (AAM) will be made available under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. The laudable stated aim of the RRS is to achieve immediate open access to research outputs, while preserving journal choice for authors. However, proponents of the RRS overlook the significant administrative and legal burdens that the RRS places on authors and readers. Even though compliance with existing green open access (self-archiving) policies is poor at best, the RRS is likely to rely on authors to successfully execute the CC licensing of their work in the face of publisher resistance. The complexity of copyright law and CC licensing gives many reasons to doubt the legal validity of an RRS licence grant, which creates legal risk for authors and their institutions. The complexity of RRS CC BY licensing also creates legal risk for readers, who may not be able to fully rely on the reuse rights of a CC BY licence on the AAM. However, cOAlition S has released no legal advice that explains why the RRS is valid and legally binding. Publishers of legacy subscription journals have already begun implementing strategies that ensure they can protect their revenue streams. These actions may leave authors having to choose between paying publication fees and complying with their funding agreements. The result is that the RRS increases the complexity of the copyright and licensing landscape in academic publishing, creates legal risk and may not avoid author fees. Unless increased complexity and conflict between authors and publishers drives open access, the RRS is not fit for its stated purpose as an open access strategy. The Plan S Rights Retention Strategy is an administrative and legal burden, not a sustainable open access solution","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81877155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Longevity of print book use at a small public university: a 30-year longitudinal study 小型公立大学纸质书使用寿命:一项30年的纵向研究

IF 1.1

Insights-The UKSG Journal Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.562

Melissa Belvadi

引用次数: 1

Electronic resource management in a post-Plan S world 后S计划时代的电子资源管理

IF 1.1

Insights-The UKSG Journal Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.554

Jill Emery, G. Stone

引用次数: 0