Dissemination of Applied Research to the Field: Attitudes and Practices of Faculty Authors in Social Work

IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Kimberly Pendell, Ericka Kimball
{"title":"Dissemination of Applied Research to the Field: Attitudes and Practices of Faculty Authors in Social Work","authors":"Kimberly Pendell, Ericka Kimball","doi":"10.1629/UKSG.546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In applied research disciplines like social work, the disconnect between the production and dissemination of research and the access and use of research in practice becomes very clear. This research/practice divide is particularly problematic for practitioners required to work within evidence-based or research-informed frameworks. To explore this issue, we conducted a nationwide survey and qualitative interviews with social work faculty regarding their research dissemination attitudes and practices, especially to non-academic audiences. The survey and interviews provide data on faculty dissemination methods; gold and green open access; and promotion and tenure considerations. Results demonstrate that faculty are primarily engaged with traditional dissemination methods, and much less engaged with dissemination to non-academic audiences. Faculty are skeptical of open access journals, avoid article processing charges, and are only minimally engaged with institutional repositories. Faculty are conflicted regarding the dissemination of applied research, especially in the context of promotion and tenure. Shifting dissemination to the field would require increased confidence in open access, support for the creation of practitioner focused materials, and reprioritizing impact of research in the field.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1629/UKSG.546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In applied research disciplines like social work, the disconnect between the production and dissemination of research and the access and use of research in practice becomes very clear. This research/practice divide is particularly problematic for practitioners required to work within evidence-based or research-informed frameworks. To explore this issue, we conducted a nationwide survey and qualitative interviews with social work faculty regarding their research dissemination attitudes and practices, especially to non-academic audiences. The survey and interviews provide data on faculty dissemination methods; gold and green open access; and promotion and tenure considerations. Results demonstrate that faculty are primarily engaged with traditional dissemination methods, and much less engaged with dissemination to non-academic audiences. Faculty are skeptical of open access journals, avoid article processing charges, and are only minimally engaged with institutional repositories. Faculty are conflicted regarding the dissemination of applied research, especially in the context of promotion and tenure. Shifting dissemination to the field would require increased confidence in open access, support for the creation of practitioner focused materials, and reprioritizing impact of research in the field.
应用研究向领域的传播:社会工作教员作者的态度与实践
在像社会工作这样的应用研究学科中,研究的产生和传播与研究在实践中的获取和使用之间的脱节变得非常明显。对于需要在循证或研究知情框架内工作的从业者来说,这种研究/实践鸿沟尤其成问题。为了探讨这个问题,我们在全国范围内对社会工作教师进行了调查和定性访谈,了解他们的研究传播态度和实践,特别是对非学术受众。调查和访谈提供了有关教师传播方法的数据;金绿开放接入;还有晋升和终身职位的考虑。结果表明,教师主要从事传统的传播方法,而很少从事非学术受众的传播。教师们对开放获取期刊持怀疑态度,避免收取文章处理费,并且只与机构知识库进行最低限度的接触。教师们在应用研究的传播方面存在矛盾,特别是在晋升和终身教职的背景下。将传播转移到该领域将需要增加对开放获取的信心,支持创建以从业者为重点的材料,并重新确定该领域研究的影响的优先级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Insights-The UKSG Journal
Insights-The UKSG Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信