Asian Bioethics Review最新文献_第10页

A Scoping Review of Ethical Considerations of Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination of Healthcare Workers 医护人员强制接种新冠肺炎疫苗的伦理考虑范围综述

IF 2.9

Asian Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2022-08-17 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-022-00214-5

Constance Law, Tony Skapetis, Rohan Rodricks

{"title":"A Scoping Review of Ethical Considerations of Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination of Healthcare Workers","authors":"Constance Law, Tony Skapetis, Rohan Rodricks","doi":"10.1007/s41649-022-00214-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41649-022-00214-5","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h2>Abstract\u0000</h2><div><p>Duty of care is the core ethical responsibility of healthcare workers. Getting the workforce vaccinated will provide safety to the public, protect the vulnerable population and provide a safe working environment. While most agree that healthcare workers should be prioritised in the vaccination programme, mandatory vaccination remains a complicated and contentious issue with political, legal and ethical dimensions. This study aims to determine the ethical considerations associated with mandatory vaccinations among healthcare workers. A total of 152 abstracts were identified of which, 142 were excluded based on abstracts because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. The remaining ten articles were further evaluated with three articles that fit the inclusion criteria specifically discussing mandatory vaccination among healthcare workers and the ethical issues. Benefits, risks, effectiveness, equity and justice, autonomy, reciprocity and trust were used as a framework to discuss the ethical considerations which resonated both directly from the included papers, as well as more generally from the other literature associated with this search. There is limited literature on the topic of ethical considerations associated with COVID-19 mandatory vaccination of healthcare workers, as a systematic review identified only 3 papers. Benefits, risks, effectiveness, equity and justice, autonomy, reciprocity and trust were among the seven ethical considerations identified and discussed.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":44520,"journal":{"name":"Asian Bioethics Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41649-022-00214-5.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40628696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Non-pharmaceutical Interventions and Social Distancing as Intersubjective Care and Collective Protection 非药物干预与社会距离作为主体间关怀和集体保护

IF 2.9

Asian Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2022-08-13 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-022-00212-7

Corrado Piroddi

引用次数: 0

Autonomy in Japan: What does it Look Like? 日本的自治：它是什么样子的？

IF 2.9

Asian Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2022-08-11 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-022-00213-6

Akira Akabayashi, Eisuke Nakazawa

{"title":"Autonomy in Japan: What does it Look Like?","authors":"Akira Akabayashi, Eisuke Nakazawa","doi":"10.1007/s41649-022-00213-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41649-022-00213-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper analysed the nature of autonomy, in particular respect for autonomy in medical ethics/bioethics in Japan. We have undertaken a literature survey in Japanese and English and begin with the historical background and explanation of the Japanese word <i>Jiritsu (autonomy)</i>. We go on to identify patterns of meaning that researchers use in medical ethics / bioethics discussions in Japan, namely, Beauchamp and Childress’s individual autonomy, relational autonomy, and O’Neill’s principled autonomy as the three major ways that autonomy is understood. We examine papers discussing these interpretations. We propose using the term ‘a form of autonomy’ first used by Edmund Pellegrino in 1992 and examine the nature of ‘a form of autonomy.’ We finally conclude that the crux of what Pellegrino calls ‘something close to autonomy,’ or ‘a form of autonomy' might best be understood as the minimization of physician paternalism and the maximization of respect for patient preference. Simultaneously, we introduce a family-facilitated approach to informed consent and respond to criticism by Laura Sullivan. Finally, we discuss cross-cultural approaches and global bioethics. Furthermore, we use the term ‘Bioethics across the Globe’ instead of ‘Global Bioethics’, calling for international scholars to write works to provide an in-depth understanding of each country. We conclude that deep understanding of others is pivotal for dialogue to be of value. We hope this article will deepen the reader’s understanding of Japan and will contribute to the progress of bioethics worldwide.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44520,"journal":{"name":"Asian Bioethics Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41649-022-00213-6.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33491516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing of Organs according to the Perspective of Islamic Law 从伊斯兰法律的角度看器官的三维打印

IF 2.9

Asian Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2022-07-29 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-022-00210-9

Anir Mursyida Sabri, Mohd Anuar Ramli, Noor Naemah Abdul Rahman, Mohammad Naqib Hamdan

{"title":"Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing of Organs according to the Perspective of Islamic Law","authors":"Anir Mursyida Sabri, Mohd Anuar Ramli, Noor Naemah Abdul Rahman, Mohammad Naqib Hamdan","doi":"10.1007/s41649-022-00210-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41649-022-00210-9","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h2>Abstract\u0000</h2><div><p>The outburst of the fourth Industrial Revolution had a significant impact on many aspects of life. The discovery of new technologies in medicine has resulted in innovations: organ transplants. The introduction of three-dimensional (3D) organ printing technology promises improvements to the field. Organs such as the liver, kidneys, heart and others are printed to meet the needs of the actual organs. However, the production of prototype organs to replace the original organs is associated with the issue of changing the creation of Allah. Accordingly, this study will analyse the issue of changing the creation of God in three-dimensional (3D) organ printing technology according to the perspective of Islamic law. Several appropriate methodologies in Islamic law (<i>usul fiqh</i>) are used such as legal reasoning through <i>maqasid shariah</i> perspective and analogical reasoning. The result shows that three-dimensional (3D) organ printing technology falls under the permissible category of changing the creation of Allah because it can save human lives. The production of organs through 3D printing involving changes included in the category of necessity (<i>daruri</i>) and need (<i>hajiy</i>) is permissible, but the category of desirable (<i>tahsini</i>) requires further specifications.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":44520,"journal":{"name":"Asian Bioethics Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41649-022-00210-9.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10508137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Values, Principles, Perspectives and Attitudes in Bioethics 生物伦理学的价值观、原则、观点和态度

IF 2.9

Asian Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2022-06-16 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-022-00209-2

Graeme T. Laurie

引用次数: 0

Ethical Analysis of Appropriate Incentive Measures Promoting Organ Donation in Bangladesh 孟加拉国促进器官捐献适当激励措施的伦理分析

IF 2.9

Asian Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2022-05-14 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-022-00208-3

Md. Sanwar Siraj

{"title":"Ethical Analysis of Appropriate Incentive Measures Promoting Organ Donation in Bangladesh","authors":"Md. Sanwar Siraj","doi":"10.1007/s41649-022-00208-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41649-022-00208-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bangladesh, a Muslim-majority country, has a national organ donation law that was passed in 1999 and revised in 2018. The law allows living-related and brain-dead donor organ transplantation. There are no legal barriers to these two types of organ donations, but there is no legislation providing necessary costs and incentive measures associated with successful organ transplants. However, many governments across the globe provide different types of incentives for motivating living donors and families of deceased donors. This study assesses the merits and demerits of incentive measures already in use around the world and proposes ethical measures that can promote organ donation in Bangladesh. The primary focus of this paper is to present an ethical analysis of the comparison of incentive measures on organ donation between Bangladesh and the Islamic Republic of Iran as two Muslim countries that operate organ donation for transplantation practices according to Islamic principles. In this paper, I mainly argue that providing a fixed bare minimum financial incentive measure to distantly related living donors and families of deceased donors will encourage Bangladeshis to donate organs in a manner that is ethically justifiable, morally permissible, and socio-economically appropriate. The government of Bangladesh should revise the existing biomedical law to include a provision related to incentive measures and set a strict policy to properly regulate these measures as key stewardship that can ethically promote organ donation for transplantation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44520,"journal":{"name":"Asian Bioethics Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9250557/pdf/41649_2022_Article_208.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9722737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Public Attitudes toward COVID-19 Vaccinations before Dawn in Japan: Ethics and Future Perspectives 日本公众对黎明前接种新冠肺炎疫苗的态度：伦理学和未来展望

IF 2.9

Asian Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2022-05-11 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-022-00207-4

Haruka Nakada, Kyoko Takashima, Yuichi Maru, Tsunakuni Ikka, Koichiro Yuji, Sachie Yoshida, Kenji Matsui

{"title":"Public Attitudes toward COVID-19 Vaccinations before Dawn in Japan: Ethics and Future Perspectives","authors":"Haruka Nakada, Kyoko Takashima, Yuichi Maru, Tsunakuni Ikka, Koichiro Yuji, Sachie Yoshida, Kenji Matsui","doi":"10.1007/s41649-022-00207-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41649-022-00207-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Improving public understanding and acceptance are critical for promoting coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccination. However, how to promote COVID-19 vaccine programs remains controversial due to various ethical issues. This study, thus, aimed to survey the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines among Japanese citizens and discuss relevant ethical issues. A cross-sectional survey was conducted via an online platform. An anonymous, quantitative, self-administered online questionnaire was sent to 6965 registered Japanese residents (20–79 years of age), which included questions regarding the respondent’s general knowledge, experience, and opinions of vaccines, vaccine development, COVID-19, and COVID-19 vaccines. Of the 1569 respondents, 730 (46.5%) and 839 (53.5%) were categorized into the younger and older groups, respectively. Most of the respondents possessed general knowledge of COVID-19 vaccines and their features. Of the respondents, 57.8% definitely agreed (10.5%) or somewhat agreed (47.3%) to receive COVID-19 vaccines. The older group showed significantly greater willingness to receive vaccines and higher literacy regarding vaccines in general. Possible reasons for the older group’s greater willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccines are a high risk of severe COVID-19 infection and their past accumulated experience of receiving various vaccinations. Although active public intervention could increase vaccination rates, most of the respondents did not agree with mandatory vaccination. Furthermore, a gap between the participants in the COVID-19 vaccine trials and the prioritized population in real-world vaccination should be adjusted in future vaccine development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44520,"journal":{"name":"Asian Bioethics Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50472518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

An Ethical Defense of a Mandated Choice Consent Procedure for Deceased Organ Donation 死亡器官捐献强制选择同意程序的伦理辩护

IF 2.9

Asian Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2022-04-29 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-022-00206-5

Xavier Symons, Billy Poulden

{"title":"An Ethical Defense of a Mandated Choice Consent Procedure for Deceased Organ Donation","authors":"Xavier Symons, Billy Poulden","doi":"10.1007/s41649-022-00206-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41649-022-00206-5","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h2>Abstract\u0000</h2><div><p>Organ transplant shortages are ubiquitous in healthcare systems around the world. In response, several commentators have argued for the adoption of an opt-out policy for organ transplantation, whereby individuals would by default be registered as organ donors unless they informed authorities of their desire to opt-out. This may potentially lead to an increase in donation rates. An opt-out system, however, presumes consent even when it is evident that a significant minority are resistant to organ donation. In this article, we defend a mandated choice framework for consent to deceased organ donation. A mandated choice framework, coupled with good public education, would likely increase donation rates. More importantly, however, a mandated choice framework would respect the autonomous preferences of people who do not wish to donate. We focus in particular on the Australian healthcare context, and consider how a mandated choice system could function as an ethical means to increase the organ donation rate in Australia. We make the novel proposal that all individuals who vote at an Australian federal election be required to state their organ donation preferences when voting.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":44520,"journal":{"name":"Asian Bioethics Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41649-022-00206-5.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40586915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Negotiating ‘Surrogate Mothering’ and Women’s Freedom 谈判“代孕母亲”与妇女自由

IF 2.9

Asian Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2022-04-22 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-022-00205-6

Zairu Nisha

引用次数: 0

Diversity of Experience and Perspective in Bioethics 生命伦理学经验与视角的多样性

IF 2.9

Asian Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2022-03-16 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-022-00204-7

Graeme T. Laurie

引用次数: 0