伊斯兰对单身女性非医学或社会原因选择性卵巢组织冷冻的看法。

IF 1.3 Q3 ETHICS
Alexis Heng Boon Chin, Sayyed Mohamed Muhsin, Mohd Faizal Ahmad
{"title":"伊斯兰对单身女性非医学或社会原因选择性卵巢组织冷冻的看法。","authors":"Alexis Heng Boon Chin,&nbsp;Sayyed Mohamed Muhsin,&nbsp;Mohd Faizal Ahmad","doi":"10.1007/s41649-022-00236-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Non-medical or Social egg freezing (oocyte cryopreservation) is currently a controversial topic in Islam, with contradictory <i>fatwas</i> being issued in different Muslim countries. While Islamic authorities in Egypt permit the procedure, <i>fatwas</i> issued in Malaysia have banned single Muslim women from freezing their unfertilized eggs (vitrified oocytes) to be used later in marriage. The underlying principles of the Malaysian <i>fatwas</i> are that (i) sperm and egg cells produced before marriage, should not be used during marriage to conceive a child; (ii) extraction of mature egg cells from single women being unacceptable; and (iii) fertility preservation in anticipation of late marriage is a conjecture that has not yet occurred. Ovarian tissue freezing can potentially be a more <i>Shariah</i>-compliant alternative to social egg freezing, because once the frozen ovarian cortical tissue sections have been re-transplanted back into the woman, mature egg cells can readily be produced, collected, and fertilized by the husband’s sperm only during the period of marriage contract (′<i>akd al-nikāḥ</i>). Unlike accidental mix-ups with frozen eggs, muddling of lineage (<i>nasab</i>) would be automatically avoided in ovarian tissue freezing due to immunological rejection. However, upon critical analysis based on <i>Qawā’id Fiqhiyyah</i> (Islamic Legal Maxims), <i>Maqāṣid-al-Shariah</i> (Higher Objectives of Islamic Law), and <i>Maslaḥah-Mafsadah</i> (benefits versus harmful effects on society), elective ovarian tissue freezing by healthy single women for social reasons would likely be a highly contentious and controversial issue within Muslim communities that may conflict with conservative social-religious norms. This thus needs further debate among Islamic jurists in dialogue with medical doctors and biomedical scientists.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44520,"journal":{"name":"Asian Bioethics Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41649-022-00236-z.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Islamic Perspectives on Elective Ovarian Tissue Freezing by Single Women for Non-medical or Social Reasons\",\"authors\":\"Alexis Heng Boon Chin,&nbsp;Sayyed Mohamed Muhsin,&nbsp;Mohd Faizal Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41649-022-00236-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Non-medical or Social egg freezing (oocyte cryopreservation) is currently a controversial topic in Islam, with contradictory <i>fatwas</i> being issued in different Muslim countries. While Islamic authorities in Egypt permit the procedure, <i>fatwas</i> issued in Malaysia have banned single Muslim women from freezing their unfertilized eggs (vitrified oocytes) to be used later in marriage. The underlying principles of the Malaysian <i>fatwas</i> are that (i) sperm and egg cells produced before marriage, should not be used during marriage to conceive a child; (ii) extraction of mature egg cells from single women being unacceptable; and (iii) fertility preservation in anticipation of late marriage is a conjecture that has not yet occurred. Ovarian tissue freezing can potentially be a more <i>Shariah</i>-compliant alternative to social egg freezing, because once the frozen ovarian cortical tissue sections have been re-transplanted back into the woman, mature egg cells can readily be produced, collected, and fertilized by the husband’s sperm only during the period of marriage contract (′<i>akd al-nikāḥ</i>). Unlike accidental mix-ups with frozen eggs, muddling of lineage (<i>nasab</i>) would be automatically avoided in ovarian tissue freezing due to immunological rejection. However, upon critical analysis based on <i>Qawā’id Fiqhiyyah</i> (Islamic Legal Maxims), <i>Maqāṣid-al-Shariah</i> (Higher Objectives of Islamic Law), and <i>Maslaḥah-Mafsadah</i> (benefits versus harmful effects on society), elective ovarian tissue freezing by healthy single women for social reasons would likely be a highly contentious and controversial issue within Muslim communities that may conflict with conservative social-religious norms. This thus needs further debate among Islamic jurists in dialogue with medical doctors and biomedical scientists.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Bioethics Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41649-022-00236-z.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Bioethics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41649-022-00236-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Bioethics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41649-022-00236-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

非医学或社会卵子冷冻(卵母细胞冷冻保存)目前在伊斯兰教中是一个有争议的话题,不同的穆斯林国家发布了相互矛盾的法令。虽然埃及的伊斯兰当局允许这种手术,但马来西亚颁布的法令禁止单身穆斯林妇女冷冻未受精的卵子(玻璃化卵母细胞),以便在以后的婚姻中使用。马来西亚法令的基本原则是:(一)婚前产生的精子和卵细胞,不应在婚姻期间用于怀孕;(ii)从单身妇女身上提取成熟卵细胞是不可接受的;以及(iii)预期晚婚而保持生育能力是一种尚未发生的推测。卵巢组织冷冻可能是一种更符合伊斯兰教法的替代社会卵子冷冻的方法,因为一旦冷冻的卵巢皮质组织切片被重新移植回女性体内,只有在婚姻合同期间,丈夫的精子才能很容易地产生、收集和受精成熟的卵细胞('akd al-nikāḥ). 与冷冻卵子的意外混淆不同,在卵巢组织冷冻过程中,由于免疫排斥反应,可以自动避免谱系混淆。然而,根据基于Qawā'id Fiqhiyyah(伊斯兰法律最高权威)的批判性分析,Maqāṣid al-Shariah(伊斯兰法律的更高目标)和Maslaḥah Mafsadah(对社会的益处与有害影响),健康单身女性出于社会原因选择性冷冻卵巢组织可能是穆斯林社区中一个极具争议和争议的问题,可能与保守的社会宗教规范相冲突。因此,这需要伊斯兰法学家在与医生和生物医学科学家的对话中进行进一步的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Islamic Perspectives on Elective Ovarian Tissue Freezing by Single Women for Non-medical or Social Reasons

Non-medical or Social egg freezing (oocyte cryopreservation) is currently a controversial topic in Islam, with contradictory fatwas being issued in different Muslim countries. While Islamic authorities in Egypt permit the procedure, fatwas issued in Malaysia have banned single Muslim women from freezing their unfertilized eggs (vitrified oocytes) to be used later in marriage. The underlying principles of the Malaysian fatwas are that (i) sperm and egg cells produced before marriage, should not be used during marriage to conceive a child; (ii) extraction of mature egg cells from single women being unacceptable; and (iii) fertility preservation in anticipation of late marriage is a conjecture that has not yet occurred. Ovarian tissue freezing can potentially be a more Shariah-compliant alternative to social egg freezing, because once the frozen ovarian cortical tissue sections have been re-transplanted back into the woman, mature egg cells can readily be produced, collected, and fertilized by the husband’s sperm only during the period of marriage contract (′akd al-nikāḥ). Unlike accidental mix-ups with frozen eggs, muddling of lineage (nasab) would be automatically avoided in ovarian tissue freezing due to immunological rejection. However, upon critical analysis based on Qawā’id Fiqhiyyah (Islamic Legal Maxims), Maqāṣid-al-Shariah (Higher Objectives of Islamic Law), and Maslaḥah-Mafsadah (benefits versus harmful effects on society), elective ovarian tissue freezing by healthy single women for social reasons would likely be a highly contentious and controversial issue within Muslim communities that may conflict with conservative social-religious norms. This thus needs further debate among Islamic jurists in dialogue with medical doctors and biomedical scientists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Asian Bioethics Review (ABR) is an international academic journal, based in Asia, providing a forum to express and exchange original ideas on all aspects of bioethics, especially those relevant to the region. Published quarterly, the journal seeks to promote collaborative research among scholars in Asia or with an interest in Asia, as well as multi-cultural and multi-disciplinary bioethical studies more generally. It will appeal to all working on bioethical issues in biomedicine, healthcare, caregiving and patient support, genetics, law and governance, health systems and policy, science studies and research. ABR provides analyses, perspectives and insights into new approaches in bioethics, recent changes in biomedical law and policy, developments in capacity building and professional training, and voices or essays from a student’s perspective. The journal includes articles, research studies, target articles, case evaluations and commentaries. It also publishes book reviews and correspondence to the editor. ABR welcomes original papers from all countries, particularly those that relate to Asia. ABR is the flagship publication of the Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore. The Centre for Biomedical Ethics is a collaborating centre on bioethics of the World Health Organization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信