Asian Bioethics Review最新文献_第9页

Report on the Establishment of the Consortium for Hospital Ethics Committees in Japan and the First Collaboration Conference of Hospital Ethics Committees 关于在日本成立医院伦理委员会联合会和第一届医院伦理委员会合作会议的报告

IF 2.9

Asian Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2022-09-06 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-022-00219-0

Kei Takeshita, Noriko Nagao, Hiroyuki Kaneda, Yasuhiko Miura, Takanobu Kinjo, Yoshiyuki Takimoto

{"title":"Report on the Establishment of the Consortium for Hospital Ethics Committees in Japan and the First Collaboration Conference of Hospital Ethics Committees","authors":"Kei Takeshita, Noriko Nagao, Hiroyuki Kaneda, Yasuhiko Miura, Takanobu Kinjo, Yoshiyuki Takimoto","doi":"10.1007/s41649-022-00219-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41649-022-00219-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hospital ethics committees (HECs) are expected to play extremely broad and pivotal roles such as case consultation, education of staffs on healthcare ethics, and institutional policy formation. Despite the growing importance of HECs, there are no standards for setup and operation of HECs, and composition and activities of HECs at each institution are rarely disclosed in Japan. In addition, there is also a lack of information sharing and collaboration among HECs. Therefore, the authors established the Consortium of\u0000Hospital Ethics Committees (CHEC) in October 2020, which has been regularly hosting a couple of core activities. One is the Healthcare Ethics Forum, held monthly online for CHEC members to freely discuss HECs and healthcare ethics consultation. The other is the Collaboration Conference of Hospital Ethics Committees, intended to provide a place for HEC members and administrative officers from across Japan to exchange information of their HECs, learn from each other, and cooperate to operate HECs appropriately.\u0000In this paper, the authors introduced CHEC as well as reported the results of a questionnaire survey conducted at the first conference among participating facilities, suggesting the diverse structures and activities of HECs in Japan.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44520,"journal":{"name":"Asian Bioethics Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41649-022-00219-0.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33460308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Making Meaning in Bioethics 在生命伦理学中创造意义

IF 2.9

Asian Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2022-09-06 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-022-00220-7

Graeme T. Laurie

引用次数: 0

Conception of Saviour Siblings: Religious Views in Malaysia 救世主兄弟的概念：马来西亚的宗教观点。

IF 2.9

Asian Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2022-09-03 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-022-00216-3

Chee Ying Kuek, Sharon Kaur a/p Gurmukh Singh

{"title":"Conception of Saviour Siblings: Religious Views in Malaysia","authors":"Chee Ying Kuek, Sharon Kaur a/p Gurmukh Singh","doi":"10.1007/s41649-022-00216-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41649-022-00216-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The advancement of human reproductive technology has made it possible for parents with a child affected by a haematological disorder to select and bring into being, a prospective child who can act as a matched stem cell donor. This can be done through the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) coupled with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing (PGD-HLA typing), or HLA tying as a standalone procedure, where a healthy embryo, which is an HLA match to the existing sick sibling, is chosen for implantation. The creation of such a sibling (saviour sibling) is normally taken as a last resort when there is no related or unrelated matched donor. While the conception of a saviour sibling may serve as a reliable and realistic treatment option for the ailing child, it also poses new moral questions that challenge a religiously pluralistic society such as Malaysia. The use of PGD-HLA typing may be controversial as it involves creating a life to save a life, selection of compatible human embryos and destruction of the unselected embryos. At present, there is no legal framework regulating the conception of saviour siblings. The development of ethically sound and appropriate local laws and policies should consider the views of religious communities, especially when it involves a controversial subject such as the conception of saviour siblings. This article seeks to explore the perceptions of religious scholars and representatives of the major religions professed and practised in Malaysia, namely Islam, Buddhism, Christianity and Hinduism, through qualitative interviews.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44520,"journal":{"name":"Asian Bioethics Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9530092/pdf/41649_2022_Article_216.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33491518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Status of ‘Mother’ in Gestational Surrogacy: the Shiʿi Jurisprudential Perspective “母亲”在代孕中的地位：什叶派法学视角。

IF 2.9

Asian Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2022-08-31 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-022-00217-2

Saeid Nazari Tavakkoli

引用次数: 0

Ongoing Commercialization of Gestational Surrogacy due to Globalization of the Reproductive Market before and after the Pandemic 由于疫情前后生殖市场的全球化，妊娠代孕正在进行商业化

IF 2.9

Asian Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2022-08-18 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-022-00215-4

Yuri Hibino

引用次数: 3

A Scoping Review of Ethical Considerations of Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination of Healthcare Workers 医护人员强制接种新冠肺炎疫苗的伦理考虑范围综述

IF 2.9

Asian Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2022-08-17 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-022-00214-5

Constance Law, Tony Skapetis, Rohan Rodricks

{"title":"A Scoping Review of Ethical Considerations of Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination of Healthcare Workers","authors":"Constance Law, Tony Skapetis, Rohan Rodricks","doi":"10.1007/s41649-022-00214-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41649-022-00214-5","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h2>Abstract\u0000</h2><div><p>Duty of care is the core ethical responsibility of healthcare workers. Getting the workforce vaccinated will provide safety to the public, protect the vulnerable population and provide a safe working environment. While most agree that healthcare workers should be prioritised in the vaccination programme, mandatory vaccination remains a complicated and contentious issue with political, legal and ethical dimensions. This study aims to determine the ethical considerations associated with mandatory vaccinations among healthcare workers. A total of 152 abstracts were identified of which, 142 were excluded based on abstracts because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. The remaining ten articles were further evaluated with three articles that fit the inclusion criteria specifically discussing mandatory vaccination among healthcare workers and the ethical issues. Benefits, risks, effectiveness, equity and justice, autonomy, reciprocity and trust were used as a framework to discuss the ethical considerations which resonated both directly from the included papers, as well as more generally from the other literature associated with this search. There is limited literature on the topic of ethical considerations associated with COVID-19 mandatory vaccination of healthcare workers, as a systematic review identified only 3 papers. Benefits, risks, effectiveness, equity and justice, autonomy, reciprocity and trust were among the seven ethical considerations identified and discussed.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":44520,"journal":{"name":"Asian Bioethics Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41649-022-00214-5.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40628696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Non-pharmaceutical Interventions and Social Distancing as Intersubjective Care and Collective Protection 非药物干预与社会距离作为主体间关怀和集体保护

IF 2.9

Asian Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2022-08-13 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-022-00212-7

Corrado Piroddi

引用次数: 0

Autonomy in Japan: What does it Look Like? 日本的自治：它是什么样子的？

IF 2.9

Asian Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2022-08-11 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-022-00213-6

Akira Akabayashi, Eisuke Nakazawa

{"title":"Autonomy in Japan: What does it Look Like?","authors":"Akira Akabayashi, Eisuke Nakazawa","doi":"10.1007/s41649-022-00213-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41649-022-00213-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper analysed the nature of autonomy, in particular respect for autonomy in medical ethics/bioethics in Japan. We have undertaken a literature survey in Japanese and English and begin with the historical background and explanation of the Japanese word <i>Jiritsu (autonomy)</i>. We go on to identify patterns of meaning that researchers use in medical ethics / bioethics discussions in Japan, namely, Beauchamp and Childress’s individual autonomy, relational autonomy, and O’Neill’s principled autonomy as the three major ways that autonomy is understood. We examine papers discussing these interpretations. We propose using the term ‘a form of autonomy’ first used by Edmund Pellegrino in 1992 and examine the nature of ‘a form of autonomy.’ We finally conclude that the crux of what Pellegrino calls ‘something close to autonomy,’ or ‘a form of autonomy' might best be understood as the minimization of physician paternalism and the maximization of respect for patient preference. Simultaneously, we introduce a family-facilitated approach to informed consent and respond to criticism by Laura Sullivan. Finally, we discuss cross-cultural approaches and global bioethics. Furthermore, we use the term ‘Bioethics across the Globe’ instead of ‘Global Bioethics’, calling for international scholars to write works to provide an in-depth understanding of each country. We conclude that deep understanding of others is pivotal for dialogue to be of value. We hope this article will deepen the reader’s understanding of Japan and will contribute to the progress of bioethics worldwide.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44520,"journal":{"name":"Asian Bioethics Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41649-022-00213-6.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33491516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing of Organs according to the Perspective of Islamic Law 从伊斯兰法律的角度看器官的三维打印

IF 2.9

Asian Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2022-07-29 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-022-00210-9

Anir Mursyida Sabri, Mohd Anuar Ramli, Noor Naemah Abdul Rahman, Mohammad Naqib Hamdan

{"title":"Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing of Organs according to the Perspective of Islamic Law","authors":"Anir Mursyida Sabri, Mohd Anuar Ramli, Noor Naemah Abdul Rahman, Mohammad Naqib Hamdan","doi":"10.1007/s41649-022-00210-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41649-022-00210-9","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h2>Abstract\u0000</h2><div><p>The outburst of the fourth Industrial Revolution had a significant impact on many aspects of life. The discovery of new technologies in medicine has resulted in innovations: organ transplants. The introduction of three-dimensional (3D) organ printing technology promises improvements to the field. Organs such as the liver, kidneys, heart and others are printed to meet the needs of the actual organs. However, the production of prototype organs to replace the original organs is associated with the issue of changing the creation of Allah. Accordingly, this study will analyse the issue of changing the creation of God in three-dimensional (3D) organ printing technology according to the perspective of Islamic law. Several appropriate methodologies in Islamic law (<i>usul fiqh</i>) are used such as legal reasoning through <i>maqasid shariah</i> perspective and analogical reasoning. The result shows that three-dimensional (3D) organ printing technology falls under the permissible category of changing the creation of Allah because it can save human lives. The production of organs through 3D printing involving changes included in the category of necessity (<i>daruri</i>) and need (<i>hajiy</i>) is permissible, but the category of desirable (<i>tahsini</i>) requires further specifications.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":44520,"journal":{"name":"Asian Bioethics Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41649-022-00210-9.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10508137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Values, Principles, Perspectives and Attitudes in Bioethics 生物伦理学的价值观、原则、观点和态度

IF 2.9

Asian Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2022-06-16 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-022-00209-2

Graeme T. Laurie

引用次数: 0