发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Reviewers Acknowledgement 评论家承认
IF 0.8 2区 哲学
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.1080/02698595.2023.2235854
{"title":"Reviewers Acknowledgement","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/02698595.2023.2235854","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2023.2235854","url":null,"abstract":"Published in International Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Vol. 35, No. 3-4, 2022)","PeriodicalId":44433,"journal":{"name":"International Studies in the Philosophy of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138503540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Specialisation by Value Divergence: The Role of Epistemic Values in the Branching of Scientific Disciplines 价值分化的专门化:认识价值在科学学科分支中的作用
IF 0.8 2区 哲学
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2023-07-10 DOI: 10.1080/02698595.2023.2233822
Matteo De Benedetto, Michele Luchetti
{"title":"Specialisation by Value Divergence: The Role of Epistemic Values in the Branching of Scientific Disciplines","authors":"Matteo De Benedetto, Michele Luchetti","doi":"10.1080/02698595.2023.2233822","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2023.2233822","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT According to Kuhn's speciation analogy, scientific specialisation is fundamentally analogous to biological speciation. In this paper, we extend Kuhn's original language-centred formulation of the speciation analogy, to account for episodes of scientific specialisation centred around methodological differences. Building upon recent views in evolutionary biology about the process of speciation by genetic divergence, we will show how these methodology-centred episodes of scientific specialisation can be understood as cases of specialisation driven by value divergence. We will apply our model of specialisation by value divergence to an episode of methodology-centred scientific specialisation: the emergence of molecular biology.","PeriodicalId":44433,"journal":{"name":"International Studies in the Philosophy of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42619333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Kuhn's ‘The Natures of Conceptual Change’: the search for a theory of meaning and the birth of taxonomies (1980–1994) 库恩的《概念变化的本质》：对意义理论的探索和分类法的诞生（1980-1994）
IF 0.8 2区 哲学
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2023-05-25 DOI: 10.1080/02698595.2023.2198861
Pablo Melogno
{"title":"Kuhn's ‘The Natures of Conceptual Change’: the search for a theory of meaning and the birth of taxonomies (1980–1994)","authors":"Pablo Melogno","doi":"10.1080/02698595.2023.2198861","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2023.2198861","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper examines ‘The Natures of Conceptual Change’, the Notre Dame lectures given by Kuhn in 1980. In particular, I aim to examine the content of these lectures which was not published before. This exegetical task will shed light on the sources of the notion of taxonomy used in these lectures for the first time with the explicit philosophical purposes. It also will shed new light on Kuhn's position regarding the causal theory of reference. Reviewing these archival materials paves the way for intertextual comparisons, as Kuhn included part of these lectures in the texts published later and in the book Plurality of Worlds: an Evolutionary Theory of Scientific Development. In recent years, the publication of Kuhn's archival material and the research on these texts increased in quantity and quality. Faced with this encouraging landscape, a comparative examination of the different unpublished texts is crucial to refining both our research tools on Kuhn's intellectual biography and the philosophical work inspired by his proposal.","PeriodicalId":44433,"journal":{"name":"International Studies in the Philosophy of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49287149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Challenge of Quantum Mechanics to the Rationality of Science: Philosophers of Science on Bohr 量子力学对科学合理性的挑战——科学哲学家论玻尔
IF 0.8 2区 哲学
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2023-05-15 DOI: 10.1080/02698595.2023.2207404
Marij van Strien
{"title":"The Challenge of Quantum Mechanics to the Rationality of Science: Philosophers of Science on Bohr","authors":"Marij van Strien","doi":"10.1080/02698595.2023.2207404","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2023.2207404","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44433,"journal":{"name":"International Studies in the Philosophy of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42994975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beyond Structure: New Frontiers of the Philosophy of Thomas Kuhn 超越结构:托马斯·库恩哲学的新疆域
2区 哲学
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/02698595.2023.2264158
Vincenzo Politi, Yafeng Shan
{"title":"Beyond Structure: New Frontiers of the Philosophy of Thomas Kuhn","authors":"Vincenzo Politi, Yafeng Shan","doi":"10.1080/02698595.2023.2264158","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2023.2264158","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996) is widely considered as one of the most important philosophers of science of the 20th century, while his The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (SSR) is regarded as one of the most influential works in the philosophy ofscience. At the same time, however, his place within philosophy of science remains ambiguous. On the one hand, despite the popularity of SSR, there is no proper ‘Kuhnian school of thought’ in HPS. On the other hand, the interest towards Kuhn does not seem to fade away and the number of publications about his work does not seem to decrease. We suggest that there are at least three different ways to go ‘beyond SSR’: (i) by scrutinising the development of Kuhn’s thought, from his pre- to his post-SSR writings; (ii) by contextualising Kuhn in the philosophical milieu of his time, thus interpreting his view as emerging from the intellectual exchanges he had with contemporary philosophers; (iii) by reinterpreting and developing some of his most known ideas, in ways that perhaps Kuhn himself was not able to contemplate.","PeriodicalId":44433,"journal":{"name":"International Studies in the Philosophy of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135717423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fake Research: How Can We Recognise it and Respond to it? 虚假研究:我们如何识别并应对?
IF 0.8 2区 哲学
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2023-03-21 DOI: 10.1080/02698595.2023.2187206
M. Carrier
{"title":"Fake Research: How Can We Recognise it and Respond to it?","authors":"M. Carrier","doi":"10.1080/02698595.2023.2187206","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2023.2187206","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44433,"journal":{"name":"International Studies in the Philosophy of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47964664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
On the Harms of Agnotological Practices and How to Address Them 论不可知论实践的危害及如何解决
IF 0.8 2区 哲学
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2023-02-19 DOI: 10.1080/02698595.2023.2178838
Inmaculada de Melo-Martín
{"title":"On the Harms of Agnotological Practices and How to Address Them","authors":"Inmaculada de Melo-Martín","doi":"10.1080/02698595.2023.2178838","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2023.2178838","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44433,"journal":{"name":"International Studies in the Philosophy of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46187687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Linguistic Discrimination in Science: Can English Disfluency Help Debias Scientific Research? 科学中的语言歧视：英语不流利能帮助Debias的科学研究吗？
IF 0.8 2区 哲学
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/02698595.2023.2251676
Uwe Peters
{"title":"Linguistic Discrimination in Science: Can English Disfluency Help Debias Scientific Research?","authors":"Uwe Peters","doi":"10.1080/02698595.2023.2251676","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2023.2251676","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The English language now dominates scientific communications. Yet, many scientists have English as their second language. Their English proficiency may therefore often be more limited than that of a ‘native speaker’, and their scientific contributions (e.g. manuscripts) in English may frequently contain linguistic features that disrupt the fluency of a reader’s, or listener’s information processing even when the contributions are understandable. Scientific gatekeepers (e.g. journal reviewers) sometimes cite these features to justify negative decisions on manuscripts. Such justifications may rest on the prima facie plausible assumption that linguistic characteristics that hinder fast and easy understandability of scientific contributions are epistemically undesirable in science. I shall raise some doubts about this assumption by drawing on empirical research on processing fluency and its biasing effects. I also argue that directing scientists with English as a foreign language toward approaching ‘native-level’ English can have the negative consequence of reducing their potential to make scientific belief formation more reliable. These points suggest that one seemingly compelling justification for linguistically discriminating against scientific contributions in ‘non-native’ English is questionable and that the common insistence by scientific gatekeepers on ‘native-like’ English may be epistemically harmful to science.","PeriodicalId":44433,"journal":{"name":"International Studies in the Philosophy of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48067481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Ernest Nagel's Model of Reduction and Theory Change 欧内斯特·纳格尔的归约模型与理论变革
IF 0.8 2区 哲学
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/02698595.2023.2204792
Bohang Chen
{"title":"Ernest Nagel's Model of Reduction and Theory Change","authors":"Bohang Chen","doi":"10.1080/02698595.2023.2204792","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2023.2204792","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A longstanding criticism of Ernest Nagel's model of reduction is that it fails to take theory change into account. This criticism builds on the received view that Nagelian reductions are incompatible with theory change. This article challenges the received view by showing that Nagel's model can easily accommodate theory change. Indeed, Nagel's model is essentially static as it only gives unchanging formal and nonformal conditions for reduction; in contrast, theory change belongs to the dynamic history of science; as a result, the application of Nagel's model to scientific knowledge from different historical periods yields a series of Nagelian reductions of different degrees of reductive success. This Nagelian treatment of theory change is illustrated by considering the enterprise of reducing thermodynamics to statistical mechanics in the late nineteenth century. It is also contended that, in handling theory change Nagel's model has greater merits than subsequent models (exemplified by Kenneth Schaffner's general reduction-replacement model). This article concludes by suggesting that Nagel's model of reduction deals with theory change exactly in the same way as logical empiricism does with historicism.","PeriodicalId":44433,"journal":{"name":"International Studies in the Philosophy of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46521790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Problem-Feeding as a Model for Interdisciplinary Research 问题喂养作为跨学科研究的一种模式
IF 0.8 2区 哲学
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2022-12-06 DOI: 10.1080/02698595.2022.2152632
H. Thorén, Johannes Persson
{"title":"Problem-Feeding as a Model for Interdisciplinary Research","authors":"H. Thorén, Johannes Persson","doi":"10.1080/02698595.2022.2152632","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2022.2152632","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Philosophers of science have in recent years become increasingly interested in the notion of interdisciplinarity. One important form interdisciplinarity can take is that of a dynamic exchange of problems and solutions between disciplines—what has recently been called problem-feeding. On this model problems arising within specific disciplines are sometimes solved more effectively by, or in collaboration with, other disciplines. In this paper we explore this model as a framework for thinking about, and actively structuring, interdisciplinary research. We point to the applicability of the problem-feeding model, and to some of the prerequisites of problem-feeding interdisciplinarity, highlighting in particular the harmonisation of goals and the establishment of mutual trust between disciplines.","PeriodicalId":44433,"journal":{"name":"International Studies in the Philosophy of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48919341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信