The Curious Incident of Indistinguishable Selves A Reply to Nešić

IF 0.7 2区哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/02698595.2022.2153215

M. D. Beni

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This is a short discussion of Janko Nešić’s [2022. “Towards a Neutral-Structuralist Theory of Consciousness and Selfhood.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 1–17], which conveys a critical review of Beni’s Structural Realist theory of the Self (SRS). Nešić’s critique indicates that there is an incongruity between the structuralist tendency of SRS and its commitment to panpsychism. He argues that Beni can use the notion of internal information to develop a more congenial account of consciousness than panpsychism. In this paper, I defend the panpsychist component of Beni’s theory and explain why I think it’s preferable to Nešić’s proposal.

查看原文本刊更多论文

不可区分的自我的奇怪事件——回复Nešić

摘要这是对Janko Nešić的【2022】的简短讨论。“走向意识和自我的中立结构主义理论”，《国际科学哲学研究》，1-17]，对贝尼的结构现实主义自我理论（SRS）进行了批判性回顾。Nešić的批评表明，SRS的结构主义倾向与其对泛精神主义的承诺之间存在着不一致。他认为，贝尼可以利用内部信息的概念来发展一种比泛精神主义更适合的意识解释。在这篇论文中，我为贝尼理论中的泛精神主义成分进行了辩护，并解释了为什么我认为它比NešIć的建议更可取。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： International Studies in the Philosophy of Science is a scholarly journal dedicated to publishing original research in philosophy of science and in philosophically informed history and sociology of science. Its scope includes the foundations and methodology of the natural, social, and human sciences, philosophical implications of particular scientific theories, and broader philosophical reflection on science. The editors invite contributions not only from philosophers, historians, and sociologists of science, but also from researchers in the sciences. The journal publishes articles from a wide variety of countries and philosophical traditions.

文献相关原料

公司名称	产品信息	采购帮参考价格