Militares e Política, Marcelo Macedo Corrêa, A. Franco, Rodrigo Perez Oliveira
{"title":"Numéro 7","authors":"Militares e Política, Marcelo Macedo Corrêa, A. Franco, Rodrigo Perez Oliveira","doi":"10.25518/1782-2041.912","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25518/1782-2041.912","url":null,"abstract":"The core thematic of this article rests in the influence of the Real Military Academy in the formation and structuring of the warmongering thought of the Brazilian Army. The empirical bias for finding of such assertive one was grounded in the creation this Military Academy in “brasílicas” lands, in 1810, distinguishing the idiosyncrasies of its statutes and regulations, whose main objective was to project the power of the “lusitana” crown in its expressive colony. In this direction, the thought of the minister of the foreign affairs and the war of Portugal is approached, Rodrigo de Souza Coutinho, during its permanence in Brazil, when of the coming of the real family. Its main incumbency was to forge an army in the colony, as form to keep at the hands of the cut the monopoly of the violence. For the Portuguese minister, an army had its value * Doutorando em História Militar (PPG/ECEME), Mestre em História Política (UFPR), Prêmio Tasso Fragoso 2004 e 2010 (Bibliex). E-mail: andresfranco@bol.com.br. 8 – André Luiz dos Santos Franco Militares e Polít ica , n . o 7 ( jul . -dez. 2010) , p . 7 -22. marked out with buoys for the value of its officers and its commanders. Thus, the Real Military Academy was created in such a way as a former institute of officers for the colonial army as an educational establishment of engineering. Throughout this article, the fact of the Real Academy is disclosed to have the double mission to take care of to the military necessities and the propagandas of the civil public services, therefore the colony needed a body of engineers capable to diminish the distances and to increase its power infrastructure. The birth of this military dichotomy between formations and engineering inside of the same warlike educational establishment impregnated the rows of the Brazilian Army for more than a century, justifying the relevance of the study of this thematic one in the military history of Portugal and of Brazil. Words-key: Real Military Academy, Rodrigo de Souza Coutinho, military structure. O passeio pela auto-reflexão do passado é certamente um assunto que pertence ao ofício de qualquer historiador. A elaboração de uma reflexão do sujeito cognoscente sobre si se efetiva na correlação com o objeto primário do pensamento: a própria história. A partir desta assertiva, defende-se uma reflexão sobre a gênese do universo bacharelesco que deu origem ao longo caminho da construção identitária da elite militar brasileira, atrelada à influência da cultura militar da metrópole portuguesa na formação e estruturação do pensamento belicista do Exército Brasileiro. A vinda da família real para o Brasil marcou definitivamente o destino da colônia portuguesa. O período foi de extremas mudanças e transformações. Os portos coloniais interditados ao mundo desde o descobrimento destas terras estavam finalmente abertos para o intercâmbio internacional. O príncipe D. João favoreceu a abertura de escolas que acabaram sendo fundamentais para a introdução ","PeriodicalId":440728,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123489378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Numéro 5","authors":"Aurelio Sainz Pezonaga","doi":"10.25518/1782-2041.1028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25518/1782-2041.1028","url":null,"abstract":"El pasado 24 de octubre nos dejaba Juan Carlos Rodríguez. Quizás suene un poco exagerado, pero JCR es para mí una especie de “mito”. No fui alumno suyo ni siquiera lo conocí en persona, pero la lectura de su trabajo ha marcado profundamente mi visión de la realidad, del marxismo, de la literatura y del arte. Y, sin duda, ha determinado mi aproximación a la filosofía de Louis Althusser. Ser althusseriano en España, o en cualquier otro lugar, en los años ochenta, noventa o en la actualidad es una “aberración” intelectual, una anomalía en el espaciotiempo. No creo que haya otro pensador contemporáneo más audaz y, por tanto, más atacado que Althusser, que lleve además la herida de haber cometido el crimen execrable de matar a su mujer. Pero, si el asesinato hay que atribuirlo a su persona, como él mismo pidió en El porvenir es largo, o a la zanja oscura que se abrió en su rostro, por decirlo al modo de César Vallejo, su osadía filosófica le trasciende, es comunicable. Su desmesura se resume en una idea: la razón ilustrada “no es más que una concepción ideológica tanto de la razón como de su historia”. A la razón ilustrada no opone una u otra forma de irracionalismo, sino la producción de una racionalidad otra, histórica, no historicista, que, de la mano del marxismo, viene a reconfigurar la realidad social. Althusser fue un filósofo “maldito” cuyos trabajos han dejado en Francia y en otros países, también en España, una secuela de pensadores fundamentales. El reconocimiento de los filósofos franceses de ascendencia althusseriana como Alain Badiou o Étienne Balibar es internacional. En España, Juan Carlos Rodríguez desarrolló desde su cátedra de Literatura en la Universidad de Granada, prolongando igualmente los pasos de Althusser, una generosa ración del mejor trabajo teórico del país. Rodríguez llevaba más de cuarenta años empeñando su ingenio en una nueva práctica de la filosofía: hacer filosofía a través del rodeo por el análisis literario. En De qué hablamos cuando hablamos de marxismo, uno de sus últimos libros, recoge en buena medida textos ya publicados y algún inédito. Pero, el enfoque de conjunto es muy althusseriano. Se trata de defender el marxismo como un pensar distinto y como un pensar imprescindible. La apuesta de Althusser, la que le creó tanto intensas adhesiones como fuertes rechazos, residía en afirmar que Marx había abierto un nuevo continente y que la apertura de este nuevo territorio suponía la recomposición de todo el pensamiento occidental. Con Marx, dice Althusser, se inaugura un horizonte de pensamiento completamente distinto, cuya diferencia radical Rodríguez sitúa y sintetiza afirmando que el marxismo “piensa en -y contrala explotación vital”.","PeriodicalId":440728,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132163365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Rationalization of Consciousness: A Mereological Reconstruction of Husserl’s Fifth Logical Investigation","authors":"Alexis Delamare","doi":"10.25518/1782-2041.1256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25518/1782-2041.1256","url":null,"abstract":"Before engaging with intentionality, the philosopher of mind must consider the intrinsic nature of psychological elements. Conscious states, contrary to ordinary and scientific objects, seem to penetrate each another in such a way that it becomes impossible to enumerate, class or organize through laws the various experiences at stake. In this context, how is a science of consciousness conceivable? How is it possible to apply the epistemological requirements of any science to a domain whose ontological nature contradicts such demands? The paper reconstructs Husserl’s solution to this issue in the Fifth Logical Investigation. I show how his appeal to the mereological framework of the Third Investigation gives him the tools to rationalize the domain of the mind and to establish phenomenology as an authentic science of consciousness. I first demonstrate that the very task of phenomenological investigations is defined in mereological terms. I then reconstruct the issue regarding the inclusion of the intentional object within the act, by exposing the nuances of the Husserlian position in this famous controversy. In a last part, I show how mereological concepts are at the core of the Husserlian reinterpretation of the Brentanian thesis according to which all acts are presentations or based on presentations.","PeriodicalId":440728,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique","volume":"523 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133357544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Max Scheler’s Biologievorlesung (1908/09)","authors":"M. Properzi","doi":"10.25518/1782-2041.1277","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25518/1782-2041.1277","url":null,"abstract":"The text, known as Biologievorlesung (1908/09), written by the German phenomenologist Max Scheler appeared in 1993 in volume XIV of the Schelerian Gesammelte Werke by M.S. Frings. It collects the surviving fragments of the notes on the “Gnoseological foundations of biology” elaborated by Scheler for the cycle of lectures, which were held as Privatdozent at the University of Munich in the winter semester of the academic year 1908-1909. Despite being interesting in many respects, the text is still largely unexplored to the very day. In this article I intend to focus on two points: 1) demonstrate the relatively advanced state of progress of the proposal expressed therein by the author compared to his real first phenomenological production between the publication in 1912 of the long article Über Selbsttäuschungen and 1922, the year that marks Scheler's open detachment from the Catholic cultural horizon hitherto embraced, and 2) bring out the systematic unity of the epistemological, ontological and phenomenological themes, articulated here, in a first attempt to develop an ontology of modern science, understood as the product of a vision of a historically located world, through a descriptive analysis of the intentional structures of consciousness implicated in intellectual knowledge.","PeriodicalId":440728,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique","volume":"230 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123193379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Numéro 2: Phénoménologie et grammaire: Lois des phénomènes et lois de la signification (Actes n°8)","authors":"","doi":"10.25518/1782-2041.805","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25518/1782-2041.805","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":440728,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121952299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"L’infini anthropologique et la phénoménologie: Une réflexion sur la phénoménologie dans l’anthropologie contemporaine","authors":"Piero Carreras","doi":"10.25518/1782-2041.1263","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25518/1782-2041.1263","url":null,"abstract":"The paper tries to elucidate some of the implications of using phenomenology in anthropological research. The starting point is Blumenberg’s critique of the Husserlian Anthropologieverbot, against which he proposes a phenomenological anthropology as a “description of man” that can never be completed. This idea resonates with the use of phenomenology in contemporary ethnographic and anthropological works: the problem stems from the “disempowering” effect that this anthropological use has on the phenomenological analytical power. Phenomenology has, from an anthropological point of view, the great advantage of offering a “trans-ontological” perspective able to let the Other speak. Many influential anthropologists cite Merleau-Ponty as a key figure in their approach, as in the case of Csordas’ “embodiment paradigm”, Jackson’s “existential anthropology” or Throop’s idea of an “ethnographic epoché”. This is equally true for two of the key figures of the “Ontological turn”, Descola and Ingold, albeit in radically different ways. On the contrary, it is difficult to find philosophers influenced by “non-philosophical” anthropology. The paper discusses both advantages and limits of phenomenological approaches in anthropology, adopting philosophical and anthropological perspectives, attempting to understand the deeply asymmetrical relation of the two disciplines.","PeriodicalId":440728,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125667306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
