意识的理性化:胡塞尔第五次逻辑研究的流变重建

Alexis Delamare
{"title":"意识的理性化:胡塞尔第五次逻辑研究的流变重建","authors":"Alexis Delamare","doi":"10.25518/1782-2041.1256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Before engaging with intentionality, the philosopher of mind must consider the intrinsic nature of psychological elements. Conscious states, contrary to ordinary and scientific objects, seem to penetrate each another in such a way that it becomes impossible to enumerate, class or organize through laws the various experiences at stake. In this context, how is a science of consciousness conceivable? How is it possible to apply the epistemological requirements of any science to a domain whose ontological nature contradicts such demands? The paper reconstructs Husserl’s solution to this issue in the Fifth Logical Investigation. I show how his appeal to the mereological framework of the Third Investigation gives him the tools to rationalize the domain of the mind and to establish phenomenology as an authentic science of consciousness. I first demonstrate that the very task of phenomenological investigations is defined in mereological terms. I then reconstruct the issue regarding the inclusion of the intentional object within the act, by exposing the nuances of the Husserlian position in this famous controversy. In a last part, I show how mereological concepts are at the core of the Husserlian reinterpretation of the Brentanian thesis according to which all acts are presentations or based on presentations.","PeriodicalId":440728,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique","volume":"523 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Rationalization of Consciousness: A Mereological Reconstruction of Husserl’s Fifth Logical Investigation\",\"authors\":\"Alexis Delamare\",\"doi\":\"10.25518/1782-2041.1256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Before engaging with intentionality, the philosopher of mind must consider the intrinsic nature of psychological elements. Conscious states, contrary to ordinary and scientific objects, seem to penetrate each another in such a way that it becomes impossible to enumerate, class or organize through laws the various experiences at stake. In this context, how is a science of consciousness conceivable? How is it possible to apply the epistemological requirements of any science to a domain whose ontological nature contradicts such demands? The paper reconstructs Husserl’s solution to this issue in the Fifth Logical Investigation. I show how his appeal to the mereological framework of the Third Investigation gives him the tools to rationalize the domain of the mind and to establish phenomenology as an authentic science of consciousness. I first demonstrate that the very task of phenomenological investigations is defined in mereological terms. I then reconstruct the issue regarding the inclusion of the intentional object within the act, by exposing the nuances of the Husserlian position in this famous controversy. In a last part, I show how mereological concepts are at the core of the Husserlian reinterpretation of the Brentanian thesis according to which all acts are presentations or based on presentations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique\",\"volume\":\"523 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25518/1782-2041.1256\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25518/1782-2041.1256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在研究意向性之前,心灵哲学家必须考虑心理因素的内在本质。与普通的和科学的对象相反,意识状态似乎以这样一种方式相互渗透,以至于不可能通过法律来列举、分类或组织各种危险的经验。在这种背景下,意识科学是如何被想象的?怎么可能将任何科学的认识论要求应用到一个本体论本质与这些要求相矛盾的领域呢?本文在《第五逻辑考察》中重构了胡塞尔对这一问题的解决方法。我展示了他对《第三次调查》的流变学框架的诉求如何给他提供了使精神领域合理化的工具,并将现象学建立为一门真正的意识科学。我首先证明现象学研究的任务是用气象学的术语来定义的。然后,我通过揭示胡塞尔在这场著名的争论中立场的细微差别,重构了关于在行为中包含有意对象的问题。在最后一部分,我将展示,在胡塞尔式对布伦塔尼论点的重新诠释中,流学概念是如何成为核心的,根据布伦塔尼论点,所有的行为都是呈现或基于呈现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Rationalization of Consciousness: A Mereological Reconstruction of Husserl’s Fifth Logical Investigation
Before engaging with intentionality, the philosopher of mind must consider the intrinsic nature of psychological elements. Conscious states, contrary to ordinary and scientific objects, seem to penetrate each another in such a way that it becomes impossible to enumerate, class or organize through laws the various experiences at stake. In this context, how is a science of consciousness conceivable? How is it possible to apply the epistemological requirements of any science to a domain whose ontological nature contradicts such demands? The paper reconstructs Husserl’s solution to this issue in the Fifth Logical Investigation. I show how his appeal to the mereological framework of the Third Investigation gives him the tools to rationalize the domain of the mind and to establish phenomenology as an authentic science of consciousness. I first demonstrate that the very task of phenomenological investigations is defined in mereological terms. I then reconstruct the issue regarding the inclusion of the intentional object within the act, by exposing the nuances of the Husserlian position in this famous controversy. In a last part, I show how mereological concepts are at the core of the Husserlian reinterpretation of the Brentanian thesis according to which all acts are presentations or based on presentations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信