Culture Theory and Critique最新文献_第10页

Immediacy, causality, plasticity: Catherine Malabou and the future undoing of philosophy 直接性、因果性、可塑性:凯瑟琳·马拉布与哲学的未来毁灭

IF 0.4

Culture Theory and Critique Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/14735784.2020.1815359

Greg Hainge, Richard Iveson

引用次数: 0

Battle lines: E.1027 战线:E.1027

IF 0.4

Culture Theory and Critique Pub Date : 2019-12-11 DOI: 10.1080/14735789609366597

B. Colomina

引用次数: 13

How can culture and technics be reconciled in the digital milieu and automatic societies? Political implications of the philosophies of technology of Simondon and Stiegler 在数字环境和自动化社会中，文化和技术如何协调?西蒙顿和斯蒂格勒的技术哲学的政治含义

IF 0.4

Culture Theory and Critique Pub Date : 2019-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/14735784.2019.1674678

Anne Alombert

{"title":"How can culture and technics be reconciled in the digital milieu and automatic societies? Political implications of the philosophies of technology of Simondon and Stiegler","authors":"Anne Alombert","doi":"10.1080/14735784.2019.1674678","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2019.1674678","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article analyses the relevance of Gilbert Simondon’s proposals with respect to the challenges of contemporary technical transformations, and to weigh his influence and legacy in contemporary French thought. For Simondon, two major political challenges appear with the industrial revolution: firstly, the alienation of producers and consumers by technical machines and technical objects, and secondly, the increasing gap between the (rapid) evolution of technical realities and the (slow) evolution of cultural contents. These two challenges seem to take on new dimensions today, through generalised automation, algorithmic governmentality and digital disruption. Bernard Stiegler describes these features of contemporary society as a dis-adjustment between technical and social systems, leading to a process of generalised proletarianisation. He suggests that they may be overcome through experimenting with what he calls a contributory economy and contributory technologies. I will try to point out the theoretical gesture that makes it possible to shift from Simondon’s analysis of technical objects to Stiegler’s analysis of automatic societies. I will suggest that in spite of their theoretical divergence, Stiegler’s analysis can be seen as a way to continue Simondon’s political project, i.e. to ‘reconcile culture and technics’ in a completely transformed – and still transforming – technical epoch.","PeriodicalId":43943,"journal":{"name":"Culture Theory and Critique","volume":"23 1","pages":"315 - 326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82290319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Simondon and the technologies of control: on the individuation of the dividual 西蒙顿与控制技术:论个人的个体化

IF 0.4

Culture Theory and Critique Pub Date : 2019-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/14735784.2019.1694211

Pierluca D’Amato

{"title":"Simondon and the technologies of control: on the individuation of the dividual","authors":"Pierluca D’Amato","doi":"10.1080/14735784.2019.1694211","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2019.1694211","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Can Simondon’s thought provide us with the tools to consider the evolution of computational technologies of power in their intersection with capitalism’s digital turn? To answer to this question, this essay projects a line of interaction between Simondon’s and Deleuze’s philosophies in order to enable the comprehension of the technical means through which twenty-first-century domination is exerted in the form of digital modulation. The description of this form of domination must take into account the relation between topology and individuation and how this relation is altered by the computational, that reconfigures the naturalisation of technical objects as a process of ‘becoming-alive’ of digital technologies. To this end, this essay considers Deleuze’s insights in matters of non-Euclidean spaces and describes one of the central concepts of the Post-scriptum sur les sociétés du contrôle, the dividual, from the standpoint of its associated digital milieu. Attempting to update Simondon’s mechanology to address a digital technology of power, this essay will then describe the technical lineage of the dividual and its peculiar process of individuation in its hybrid or monstrous character.","PeriodicalId":43943,"journal":{"name":"Culture Theory and Critique","volume":"4 1","pages":"300 - 314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82242333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Traversing states: a reflection on digital technology and Simondon's critique of hylomorphism 穿越状态:对数字技术的反思与西蒙顿对同质性的批判

IF 0.4

Culture Theory and Critique Pub Date : 2019-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/14735784.2019.1677485

Michael M. O’Hara

引用次数: 1

Blockchain as a medium for transindividual collective 区块链作为跨个体集体的媒介

IF 0.4

Culture Theory and Critique Pub Date : 2019-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/14735784.2019.1694213

Juho Rantala

引用次数: 2

The disparity between culture & technics 文化与技术的差异

IF 0.4

Culture Theory and Critique Pub Date : 2019-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/14735784.2019.1689626

Conor Heaney

引用次数: 1

Pure information: on infinity and human nature in the technical object 纯信息:论技术对象中的无限性和人性

IF 0.4

Culture Theory and Critique Pub Date : 2019-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/14735784.2019.1680300

Cecile Malaspina

引用次数: 3

Invention and capture: a critique of Simondon 发明与捕捉:西蒙顿批判

IF 0.4

Culture Theory and Critique Pub Date : 2019-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/14735784.2019.1679652

Daniela Voss

{"title":"Invention and capture: a critique of Simondon","authors":"Daniela Voss","doi":"10.1080/14735784.2019.1679652","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2019.1679652","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The evolution of technical objects is a central theme in Simondon’s book On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. He describes it as though it were a natural process akin to the evolution of living beings; yet technical objects are invented objects that necessarily relate to human beings. The process of invention is analysed in great detail as the accomplishment of a cycle of images in Simondon’s lecture course ‘Imagination et invention’ (1965–66). However, while Simondon pays much attention to the internal logic of invention, he completely brackets off the socio-political and economic context. This essay will develop a critical perspective on Simondon’s quasi-biological conception of technical evolution and his notion of technical invention. To this end, I will draw arguments from Marx and the Marxist tradition that resonate with certain critical voices in the secondary literature on Simondon today. The goal of this essay is to show that technical invention is not an absolute and pure beginning that stimulates innovation and technical change, and to suggest an alternative and more complex view in which the pressure of economic drives and socio-political interests directly incite invention, especially where there is an institutionalised context that organises techno-scientific research.","PeriodicalId":43943,"journal":{"name":"Culture Theory and Critique","volume":"1 1","pages":"279 - 299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77073082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

The calculation of meaning: on the misunderstanding of new artificial intelligence as culture 意义的计算:论新人工智能作为文化的误解

IF 0.4

Culture Theory and Critique Pub Date : 2019-09-18 DOI: 10.1080/14735784.2019.1667255

Mercedes Bunz

引用次数: 4