发明与捕捉:西蒙顿批判

IF 0.7 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Daniela Voss
{"title":"发明与捕捉:西蒙顿批判","authors":"Daniela Voss","doi":"10.1080/14735784.2019.1679652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The evolution of technical objects is a central theme in Simondon’s book On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. He describes it as though it were a natural process akin to the evolution of living beings; yet technical objects are invented objects that necessarily relate to human beings. The process of invention is analysed in great detail as the accomplishment of a cycle of images in Simondon’s lecture course ‘Imagination et invention’ (1965–66). However, while Simondon pays much attention to the internal logic of invention, he completely brackets off the socio-political and economic context. This essay will develop a critical perspective on Simondon’s quasi-biological conception of technical evolution and his notion of technical invention. To this end, I will draw arguments from Marx and the Marxist tradition that resonate with certain critical voices in the secondary literature on Simondon today. The goal of this essay is to show that technical invention is not an absolute and pure beginning that stimulates innovation and technical change, and to suggest an alternative and more complex view in which the pressure of economic drives and socio-political interests directly incite invention, especially where there is an institutionalised context that organises techno-scientific research.","PeriodicalId":43943,"journal":{"name":"Culture Theory and Critique","volume":"1 1","pages":"279 - 299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Invention and capture: a critique of Simondon\",\"authors\":\"Daniela Voss\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14735784.2019.1679652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The evolution of technical objects is a central theme in Simondon’s book On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. He describes it as though it were a natural process akin to the evolution of living beings; yet technical objects are invented objects that necessarily relate to human beings. The process of invention is analysed in great detail as the accomplishment of a cycle of images in Simondon’s lecture course ‘Imagination et invention’ (1965–66). However, while Simondon pays much attention to the internal logic of invention, he completely brackets off the socio-political and economic context. This essay will develop a critical perspective on Simondon’s quasi-biological conception of technical evolution and his notion of technical invention. To this end, I will draw arguments from Marx and the Marxist tradition that resonate with certain critical voices in the secondary literature on Simondon today. The goal of this essay is to show that technical invention is not an absolute and pure beginning that stimulates innovation and technical change, and to suggest an alternative and more complex view in which the pressure of economic drives and socio-political interests directly incite invention, especially where there is an institutionalised context that organises techno-scientific research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture Theory and Critique\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"279 - 299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture Theory and Critique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2019.1679652\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture Theory and Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2019.1679652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

技术客体的演化是西蒙东《论技术客体的存在方式》一书的中心主题。他把它描述为一个类似于生物进化的自然过程;然而,技术对象是发明的对象,必然与人类有关。在西蒙顿的讲座课程“想象与发明”(1965-66)中,发明的过程被详细分析为图像循环的完成。然而,西蒙顿在关注发明的内在逻辑的同时,完全脱离了社会政治和经济背景。本文将对西蒙东关于技术进化的准生物学概念及其技术发明的概念进行批判。为此,我将引用马克思和马克思主义传统的观点,这些观点与今天关于西蒙顿的二手文献中的某些批评声音产生共鸣。本文的目的是表明技术发明不是刺激创新和技术变革的绝对和纯粹的开始,并提出另一种更复杂的观点,即经济驱动和社会政治利益的压力直接刺激发明,特别是在组织技术科学研究的制度化背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Invention and capture: a critique of Simondon
ABSTRACT The evolution of technical objects is a central theme in Simondon’s book On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. He describes it as though it were a natural process akin to the evolution of living beings; yet technical objects are invented objects that necessarily relate to human beings. The process of invention is analysed in great detail as the accomplishment of a cycle of images in Simondon’s lecture course ‘Imagination et invention’ (1965–66). However, while Simondon pays much attention to the internal logic of invention, he completely brackets off the socio-political and economic context. This essay will develop a critical perspective on Simondon’s quasi-biological conception of technical evolution and his notion of technical invention. To this end, I will draw arguments from Marx and the Marxist tradition that resonate with certain critical voices in the secondary literature on Simondon today. The goal of this essay is to show that technical invention is not an absolute and pure beginning that stimulates innovation and technical change, and to suggest an alternative and more complex view in which the pressure of economic drives and socio-political interests directly incite invention, especially where there is an institutionalised context that organises techno-scientific research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Culture Theory and Critique
Culture Theory and Critique HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信