{"title":"The calculation of meaning: on the misunderstanding of new artificial intelligence as culture","authors":"Mercedes Bunz","doi":"10.1080/14735784.2019.1667255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A wide range of different AI systems based on the promising technology of machine learning has been implemented into everyday life without further ado, at times supplanting and delivering institutional decisions. Following Gilbert Simondon’s analysis in On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects, this essay explores the contemporary technical objects of new Artificial Intelligence systems to ask if their premature acceptance might be based on a misunderstanding: AI systems are able to calculate meaning, whereby they are performing a task traditionally rooted in the sphere of culture. Are AI-informed technical objects, because of their new ability of calculating meaning, mistakenly being read as an ‘aesthetic object’ thereby creating the illusion of being ‘integrated’ into the world? And how could their integration be understood differently? The article contributes to studies located at the intersection of work on Simondon and digital technology, thereby traversing Science and Technology Studies and Philosophy of Technology.","PeriodicalId":43943,"journal":{"name":"Culture Theory and Critique","volume":"432 1","pages":"264 - 278"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture Theory and Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2019.1667255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
ABSTRACT A wide range of different AI systems based on the promising technology of machine learning has been implemented into everyday life without further ado, at times supplanting and delivering institutional decisions. Following Gilbert Simondon’s analysis in On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects, this essay explores the contemporary technical objects of new Artificial Intelligence systems to ask if their premature acceptance might be based on a misunderstanding: AI systems are able to calculate meaning, whereby they are performing a task traditionally rooted in the sphere of culture. Are AI-informed technical objects, because of their new ability of calculating meaning, mistakenly being read as an ‘aesthetic object’ thereby creating the illusion of being ‘integrated’ into the world? And how could their integration be understood differently? The article contributes to studies located at the intersection of work on Simondon and digital technology, thereby traversing Science and Technology Studies and Philosophy of Technology.
基于有前途的机器学习技术的各种不同的人工智能系统已经被应用到日常生活中,有时取代和提供制度决策。继吉尔伯特·西蒙顿(Gilbert Simondon)在《论技术对象的存在模式》(On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects)中的分析之后,本文探讨了新人工智能系统的当代技术对象,并询问它们的过早接受是否可能基于一种误解:人工智能系统能够计算意义,因此它们正在执行传统上植根于文化领域的任务。人工智能技术对象是否因为具有计算意义的新能力而被错误地解读为“美学对象”,从而创造了一种“融入”世界的错觉?他们的结合又有什么不同的理解呢?这篇文章对西蒙东和数字技术的交叉研究做出了贡献,从而跨越了科学与技术研究和技术哲学。