{"title":"Simondon and the technologies of control: on the individuation of the dividual","authors":"Pierluca D’Amato","doi":"10.1080/14735784.2019.1694211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Can Simondon’s thought provide us with the tools to consider the evolution of computational technologies of power in their intersection with capitalism’s digital turn? To answer to this question, this essay projects a line of interaction between Simondon’s and Deleuze’s philosophies in order to enable the comprehension of the technical means through which twenty-first-century domination is exerted in the form of digital modulation. The description of this form of domination must take into account the relation between topology and individuation and how this relation is altered by the computational, that reconfigures the naturalisation of technical objects as a process of ‘becoming-alive’ of digital technologies. To this end, this essay considers Deleuze’s insights in matters of non-Euclidean spaces and describes one of the central concepts of the Post-scriptum sur les sociétés du contrôle, the dividual, from the standpoint of its associated digital milieu. Attempting to update Simondon’s mechanology to address a digital technology of power, this essay will then describe the technical lineage of the dividual and its peculiar process of individuation in its hybrid or monstrous character.","PeriodicalId":43943,"journal":{"name":"Culture Theory and Critique","volume":"4 1","pages":"300 - 314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture Theory and Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2019.1694211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
ABSTRACT Can Simondon’s thought provide us with the tools to consider the evolution of computational technologies of power in their intersection with capitalism’s digital turn? To answer to this question, this essay projects a line of interaction between Simondon’s and Deleuze’s philosophies in order to enable the comprehension of the technical means through which twenty-first-century domination is exerted in the form of digital modulation. The description of this form of domination must take into account the relation between topology and individuation and how this relation is altered by the computational, that reconfigures the naturalisation of technical objects as a process of ‘becoming-alive’ of digital technologies. To this end, this essay considers Deleuze’s insights in matters of non-Euclidean spaces and describes one of the central concepts of the Post-scriptum sur les sociétés du contrôle, the dividual, from the standpoint of its associated digital milieu. Attempting to update Simondon’s mechanology to address a digital technology of power, this essay will then describe the technical lineage of the dividual and its peculiar process of individuation in its hybrid or monstrous character.
西蒙顿的思想能否为我们提供一种工具,来思考权力计算技术的演变与资本主义的数字化转型之间的交集?为了回答这个问题,本文在西蒙东和德勒兹的哲学之间建立了一条相互作用的路线,以便能够理解21世纪的统治以数字调制的形式施加的技术手段。这种统治形式的描述必须考虑到拓扑和个性化之间的关系,以及这种关系如何被计算所改变,计算将技术对象的自然化重新配置为数字技术的“活起来”过程。为此,本文考虑了德勒兹在非欧几里得空间问题上的见解,并从与之相关的数字环境的角度描述了Post-scriptum sur les sociesamtsams du contrôle(个人)的核心概念之一。试图更新西蒙顿的机制,以解决数字技术的权力,这篇文章将描述个人的技术血统及其独特的个性化过程在其混合或怪异的性格。