发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

London Review of International Law最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
The tyranny of strangers: transformative occupations old and new 陌生人的暴政:新旧变革的职业
IF 0.5
London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/lril/lrab017
M. Craven
{"title":"The tyranny of strangers: transformative occupations old and new","authors":"M. Craven","doi":"10.1093/lril/lrab017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lrab017","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 In the aftermath of the US led invasion of Iraq in 2003, considerable attention was given to the apparent emergence of a new type of belligerent occupation—the ‘transformative occupation’ which apparently challenged the traditional assumptions of the law of occupation. The suggestion here is that, as an examination of the British occupation of Mesopotamia between 1914-1924 reveals, the ‘transformative occupation’ is by no means a new institution, but is one that may be associated with a tradition of thought and practice in which the institution of belligerent occupationwas made congruent with the operational rationalities of colonial rule by re-imagining it as a form of sacred trust. The legacy of that history, it is contended, is critical for understanding the role of occupation law today.","PeriodicalId":43782,"journal":{"name":"London Review of International Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42382489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
International law, politics and opposition to the Iraq War 国际法，政治和反对伊拉克战争
IF 0.5
London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/lril/lrab014
R. Knox
{"title":"International law, politics and opposition to the Iraq War","authors":"R. Knox","doi":"10.1093/lril/lrab014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lrab014","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 A key feature of the Iraq war was the prominence of international legal argument. This article argues that the motif of the ‘illegal war’ was crucial in mobilisations against the war. It traces the reasons for the prominence of this ‘illegal war’ motif and the wider political consequences of its adoption.","PeriodicalId":43782,"journal":{"name":"London Review of International Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46327791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Maritime demarcation in the Gulf after 2003 2003年后海湾的海洋划界
IF 0.5
London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/lril/lrab015
G. Heathcote
{"title":"Maritime demarcation in the Gulf after 2003","authors":"G. Heathcote","doi":"10.1093/lril/lrab015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lrab015","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This paper uses the Iranian detention of twelve British naval and marine personnel in the Northern Gulf in March 2007 as a prompt to examine the place of the 2003 invasion of Iraq within the continuities and ruptures of the international legal imagination, including that of critical international lawyers.","PeriodicalId":43782,"journal":{"name":"London Review of International Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47164235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Symposium Introduction: The 2003 Iraq War: history, legacy, resistance 研讨会简介：2003年伊拉克战争：历史、遗产、抵抗
IF 0.5
London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/lril/lrab016
K. Grady
{"title":"Symposium Introduction: The 2003 Iraq War: history, legacy, resistance","authors":"K. Grady","doi":"10.1093/lril/lrab016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lrab016","url":null,"abstract":"This short symposium brings together several distinguished scholars to discuss Gene Garver’s recent book, For the Sake of Argument: Practical Reasoning, Character and the Ethics of Belief (University of Chicago Press, 2004). Garver is Regents Professor of Philosophy at Saint John’s University and Adjunct Professor in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Minnesota, and he is widely acclaimed for his work on Aristotle. For the Sake of Argument is a substantial contribution to the literature because it applies an exciting interpretation of the connections between Aristotle’s Rhetoric and Nicomachean Ethics to legal practice. Although it might seem trite to say that law is a rhetorical activity that is grounded in practical reasoning, Garver demonstrates the deep significance of this insight through his careful exegesis of Aristotle. I first met Gene (briefly) at an early Annual Meeting of the Working Group on Law, Culture and the Humanities at Wake Forest University, where he spoke on legal rhetoric as part of a panel that included Eileen Scallen, who is one of the contributors to this Symposium. Since then we have collaborated on several panels at this annual conference, and","PeriodicalId":43782,"journal":{"name":"London Review of International Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45217856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Public invocations of international law and legacies of the Iraq War 公开援引国际法和伊拉克战争遗产
IF 0.5
London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/lril/lrab009
Madelaine Chiam
{"title":"Public invocations of international law and legacies of the Iraq War","authors":"Madelaine Chiam","doi":"10.1093/lril/lrab009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lrab009","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This essay reads three texts: Charlotte Peevers’s The Politics of Justifying Force: the Suez Crisis, the Iraq War and International Law, the 2016 Report of the UK Iraq Inquiry, and Ayça Çubukçu’s For the Love of Humanity: The World Tribunal On Iraq. It explores what each of the texts tells us about the role of international law as a public language and suggests how we might think of the texts as creating one legacy of the Iraq War.","PeriodicalId":43782,"journal":{"name":"London Review of International Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45417185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A life in human rights: a conversation with Dennis Davis 人权生活：与Dennis Davis的对话
IF 0.5
London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2021-06-28 DOI: 10.1093/lril/lrab008
Tor Krever
{"title":"A life in human rights: a conversation with Dennis Davis","authors":"Tor Krever","doi":"10.1093/lril/lrab008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lrab008","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Dennis Davis is Judge of the High Court of South Africa, Judge President of the Competition Appeal Court, and Honorary Professor of Law at the University of Cape Town. In this wide-ranging conversation with Tor Krever, he reflects on his political and intellectual trajectory—from early encounters with Marx to anti-apartheid activism to a leading position in the South African judiciary—and his lifelong commitment to a radical left politics.","PeriodicalId":43782,"journal":{"name":"London Review of International Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41882082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The law of the global economy and the spectre of inequality 全球经济的规律和不平等的幽灵
IF 0.5
London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2021-06-12 DOI: 10.1093/LRIL/LRAB005
I. Venzke
{"title":"The law of the global economy and the spectre of inequality","authors":"I. Venzke","doi":"10.1093/LRIL/LRAB005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/LRIL/LRAB005","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Drawing on my inaugural lecture, I argue that the spectre of inequality haunts international law. The presence of the spectre first of all draws attention to what is rotten in the global economic order: how the law of the global economy has contributed to high levels of inequality while, at the same time, abdicating responsibility for it. Second, like all spectres, international law’s spectre of inequality is animated by a spirit, the spirit of social justice. It points to forsaken paths, lost memories and conjures up past possibilities that were not realized. Third, the spectre endures unless we give in and break with current repetitions. It directs those in search of progressive change towards productive contradictions within global order. Those contradictions are indeed carriers of hope. They offer reason to believe that the future is open. Engaging with the spectre of inequality in international law turns out to be much less daunting than failing to do so.","PeriodicalId":43782,"journal":{"name":"London Review of International Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41687110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The radical ideation of peasants, the ‘pseudo-radicalism’ of international human rights law, and the revolutionary lawyer 农民的激进思想、国际人权法的“伪激进主义”与革命律师
IF 0.5
London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2021-03-27 DOI: 10.1093/LRIL/LRAA024
M. Salomon
{"title":"The radical ideation of peasants, the ‘pseudo-radicalism’ of international human rights law, and the revolutionary lawyer","authors":"M. Salomon","doi":"10.1093/LRIL/LRAA024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/LRIL/LRAA024","url":null,"abstract":"This article questions the use of international human rights law in realising social transformation. It studies the new United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas, drawing on the commodity-form theory of law. Through this lens, foregrounding the relationship between capitalism and law and their shared constituent form, the contradiction in what is at times a radical normative project in international human rights law is revealed. With the unintended consequences of human rights lawyering made visible, this work turns to the means through which the advocate can launch a potentially transformative ‘legal’ strategy. An exploration of two seminal modes of reconciliation follows: reconciling the use of international human rights law with a commitment to social transformation and reconciling the post-capitalist politics of progressive lawyers with their use of the law.","PeriodicalId":43782,"journal":{"name":"London Review of International Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47745122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Painting international law as universal: imperialism and the co-opting of image and art 将国际法描绘为普世:帝国主义和图像与艺术的合用
IF 0.5
London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2021-03-27 DOI: 10.1093/LRIL/LRAB002
Kate Miles
{"title":"Painting international law as universal: imperialism and the co-opting of image and art","authors":"Kate Miles","doi":"10.1093/LRIL/LRAB002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/LRIL/LRAB002","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Visual international law tells stories. Image and art supporting imperialism in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries also projected the authority and universalism of international law. This article argues that depictions of treaty-making, of international legal theorists, and of conferences were about painting European international law as ‘successful’—telling stories of an authoritative, universal, and virtue-laden mode of international regulation.","PeriodicalId":43782,"journal":{"name":"London Review of International Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/LRIL/LRAB002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43472208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Corporations, comity and the ‘revenue rule’: a jurisprudence of offshore 公司、礼让与“收入规则”：离岸法学
IF 0.5
London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2021-03-27 DOI: 10.1093/LRIL/LRAB001
Clair Quentin
{"title":"Corporations, comity and the ‘revenue rule’: a jurisprudence of offshore","authors":"Clair Quentin","doi":"10.1093/LRIL/LRAB001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/LRIL/LRAB001","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This article contrasts the territorial unboundedness of company law, arising from ‘comity’, with the territorial constraint imposed on tax law i.e. ‘the revenue rule’. ‘Comity’ is found to be a judicial fig-leaf disguising a form of corporate sovereignty arising from the fact that economic relations are always already constituted through the corporate form before any scrutiny of their ontology. This observation is developed into a theory of ‘offshore’. The prevailing view of offshore is that the state bifurcates its sovereignty to create juridical spaces where international capital is relieved of local tax/regulatory regimes. This article seeks to underpin that view with an analysis whereby corporate capital and state sovereignty are rival species of property regime, existing in a state of mutual antagonism. On this view offshore is the juridical space, manifesting itself through the aforementioned bifurcations, where the company is sovereign over the state rather than vice-versa.","PeriodicalId":43782,"journal":{"name":"London Review of International Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/LRIL/LRAB001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43301174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信