London Review of International Law最新文献_第10页

Material pasts and futures: international law’s objects 物质的过去和未来:国际法的对象

IF 0.5

London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/lril/lrz009

Jessie Hohmann, Daniel Joyce

引用次数: 3

Crafting the lawful truth: Chile’s 1990 Truth Commission, international human rights and the museum of memory 缔造合法真相:智利1990年真相委员会、国际人权和记忆博物馆

IF 0.5

London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/lril/lrz008

Valeria Vázquez Guevara

引用次数: 2

The crime of apartheid: genealogy of a successful failure 种族隔离罪行：成功失败的谱系

IF 0.5

London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/lril/lrz005

Adam Sitze

引用次数: 1

Sifting through the ‘successful failures’ and ‘failed successes’ of international law: introducing two essays on law and failure 筛选国际法的“成功的失败”和“失败的成功”:介绍两篇关于法律和失败的文章

IF 0.5

London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/lril/lrz010

Deval Desai, Christopher Gevers, A. Khan

引用次数: 1

Freedom at sea 海上自由

IF 0.5

London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/lril/lrz006

Vasuki Nesiah

引用次数: 0

Critical histories of international law and the repression of disciplinary imagination 国际法批判史与对学科想象力的压制

IF 0.5

London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI: 10.1093/LRIL/LRZ001

Jean d’Aspremont

引用次数: 6

The invisibility of race at the ICC: lessons from the US criminal justice system 种族在国际刑事法院被忽视:来自美国刑事司法体系的教训

IF 0.5

London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI: 10.1093/LRIL/LRZ002

Randle C. DeFalco, F. Mégret

引用次数: 7

The modern and the traditional: Islam, Islamic law and European capitulations in late Qajar Iran 现代与传统:伊朗卡扎尔王朝晚期的伊斯兰教、伊斯兰法律与欧洲投降

IF 0.5

London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI: 10.1093/LRIL/LRZ004

Pierre-Alexandre Cardinal

{"title":"The modern and the traditional: Islam, Islamic law and European capitulations in late Qajar Iran","authors":"Pierre-Alexandre Cardinal","doi":"10.1093/LRIL/LRZ004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/LRIL/LRZ004","url":null,"abstract":"This article seeks to understand how the dynamic of difference described by Antony Anghie was brought to bear on the lands of the Islamic world, during the waning years of the Qajar Empire. The methodology I propose will seek to unearth the historical experience of those subjected to imperial power, including examining the effects of the doctrines and rules of international law from their perspective. How can we understand the history of international law from the perspective of its victims? My interest lies in the expression of international law against non-European polities largely influenced by (but not reducible to) Islam, and how those societies reacted against the onslaught of European colonial ventures. More specifically, I will hypothetically propose that international law was, for the European powers, a technology of Empire reinforcing the Modern/Colonial divide, especially in the dialectic relationship of secularism and Islam, the modern and the traditional. I will study this dynamic in the context of later years of the Qajar dynasty in Persia, in its relationship with the imperial powers of Great Britain and Russia. \u0000My hypothesis will be that the underlying rationale of the encounter between the modern and its Islamic other, and thus an epistemic predisposition of international law, is that secularism is a driving force of modernity, of social progress, and that the perceived Islamicate world must be made to submit to it in order for it to be accepted as an equal sovereign. Societies that lack secularism are contrasted with its presence in the West, creating an absolute enmity, an irreconcilable ontological confrontation. This, I claim, refers to Eurocentrism’s existential/ontological fear as to radical alterity of religious normative networks in the face of modern secularism. Modernity’s abyssal thinking equates a religious nomos to the backwardness of a society, and in modern international law, the religious becomes ill-legal.","PeriodicalId":43782,"journal":{"name":"London Review of International Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/LRIL/LRZ004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42760450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Pathetic fallacies: personification and the unruly subjects of international law 可悲的谬论：人格化与国际法的不守规矩主题

IF 0.5

London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI: 10.1093/LRIL/LRZ003

Joseph R. Slaughter

引用次数: 0

The unbearable lightness of international law 国际法令人难以忍受的轻盈

IF 0.5

London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2018-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/LRIL/LRY030

A. Bianchi

引用次数: 1