{"title":"反对“意识形态中立”:论自由主义和新自由主义经济和社会人权的局限性","authors":"Zachary Manfredi","doi":"10.1093/lril/lraa019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article intervenes in contemporary debates about the future of economic and social human rights. It analyses neoliberal and mainstream liberal theories and argues that both approaches substantially limit understanding of these rights. The article concludes by discussing some of the challenges facing an alternative, socialist conception of economic and social rights.","PeriodicalId":43782,"journal":{"name":"London Review of International Law","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Against ‘ideological neutrality’: on the limits of liberal and neoliberal economic and social human rights\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Manfredi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/lril/lraa019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article intervenes in contemporary debates about the future of economic and social human rights. It analyses neoliberal and mainstream liberal theories and argues that both approaches substantially limit understanding of these rights. The article concludes by discussing some of the challenges facing an alternative, socialist conception of economic and social rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"London Review of International Law\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"London Review of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lraa019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"London Review of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lraa019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Against ‘ideological neutrality’: on the limits of liberal and neoliberal economic and social human rights
This article intervenes in contemporary debates about the future of economic and social human rights. It analyses neoliberal and mainstream liberal theories and argues that both approaches substantially limit understanding of these rights. The article concludes by discussing some of the challenges facing an alternative, socialist conception of economic and social rights.