Politicka Misao-Croatian Political Science Review最新文献

{"title":"Medijatizacija i društvena promjena","authors":"Zrinjka Peruško","doi":"10.20901/PM.56.1.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20901/PM.56.1.06","url":null,"abstract":"Članak analizira medijatizaciju kao empirijski proces i novi teorijski pristup. Raspravlja se razlika između pojmova medijacije i medijatizacije te drugi novi koncepti koje uvodi taj teorijski pristup u analizi interakcije medija i društvenih promjena. U članku se prezentiraju tri glavne perspektive u teoriji medijatizacije i najvažniji autori te prethodnici u komunikacijskoj i medijskoj teoriji i široj društveno-znanstvenoj (uglavnom sociološkoj) teoriji na kojima se istraživanja dinamike i posljedica medijatizacije danas temelje. Kulturna, materijalna i institucionalna perspektiva medijatizacije (posljednja uključuje i medijatizaciju politike) analiziraju se u odnosu na razumijevanje povijesnog perioda u kojem se odvija medijatizacija, komunikacijskih medija, širih teorijskih gabarita i rezultata empirijskih istraživanja. Zaključno se razmatra recepcija pristupa u Hrvatskoj u svjetlu napredovanja medijatizacijskih promjena iz makro perspektive medijskog sustava i iz mikro perspektive informativnih navika medijskih publika.","PeriodicalId":43401,"journal":{"name":"Politicka Misao-Croatian Political Science Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.20901/PM.56.1.06","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67614152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Kulturno nasilje kao proces dugog trajanja","authors":"Goran Tepšić, Milan Vukelić","doi":"10.20901/PM.56.1.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20901/PM.56.1.04","url":null,"abstract":"U radu se polazi od teze da orijentalizam, kao oblik kulturnog nasilja, predstavlja strukturu dugog trajanja čija se matrica reprodukuje kroz diskurse i prakse različitih društvenih poredaka. Koristeći genealoški i longue durée pristup, autori analiziraju diskurse kolonijalizma, antisemitizma, nacionalizma i humanitarizma kako bi ukazali na dugotrajnost identitetske podele po liniji Zapad-Istok (Orijent), kao i na kontinuitet određenog kulturnog sadržaja koji implicira superiornost jedne i inferiornost druge strane. Analiza pokazuje i da svi ovi diskursi, iako međusobno različiti, mogu da se ukorene u orijentalističku matricu i da tako postanu instrument legitimacije i opravdavanja različitih oblika indirektnog (represija, eksploatacija) i direktnog nasilja (ratovi, genocid, etničko čišćenje). Cilj rada je razumevanje različitih oblika nasilja i njihove složenosti kao preduslov za bavljenje prevencijom nasilja.","PeriodicalId":43401,"journal":{"name":"Politicka Misao-Croatian Political Science Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.20901/PM.56.1.04","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67613772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Promjena politike osiguravanja kvalitete na javnim sveučilištima u Hrvatskoj u periodu od 2001. do 2013. godine","authors":"Nikola Baketa","doi":"10.20901/PM.56.1.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20901/PM.56.1.02","url":null,"abstract":"Autor u radu iz teorijske perspektive historijskog institucionalizma i koncepta promjene politike detektira i analizira pokretače promjene te ključne uvjete koji su omogućili ili spriječili promjenu politike osiguravanja kvalitete na javnim sveučilištima u Hrvatskoj u periodu od 2001. do 2013. godine. Radom je obuhvaćeno sedam javnih sveučilišta – Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Sveučilište u Splitu, Sveučilište u Rijeci, Sveučilište Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku, Sveučilište u Zadru, Sveučilište u Dubrovniku, te Sveučilište Jurja Dobrile u Puli. Koristeći se kvalitativnim metodama (usmjerena analiza sadržaja i polustrukturirani intervjui) kojima se prati proces promjene politike utvrđeno je da su glavni pokretači promjene izvanjski. Glavni zaključak je da institucionalna struktura može biti preduvjet koji omogućuje akterima provedbu promjene, ali da su pojedine karakteristike aktera, poput njihovih kapaciteta, nužne da bi se promjena i dogodila.","PeriodicalId":43401,"journal":{"name":"Politicka Misao-Croatian Political Science Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.20901/PM.56.1.02","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67614151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Paradoks privatnosti","authors":"Andro Pavuna","doi":"10.20901/PM.56.1.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20901/PM.56.1.05","url":null,"abstract":"Paradoks privatnosti označava diskrepanciju između deklariranog izražavanja visoke zabrinutosti za privatnost (privacy concerns) i istovremenog manifestiranja ponašanja kojim se iskazuje nebriga za privatnost, osobito kada su u pitanju društvene mreže i korištenje interneta. Cilj istraživanja bio je provjeriti manifestiraju li pojedinci koji su visoko zabrinuti za svoju privatnost ponašanja kojima je štite. Za istraživanje paradoksa privatnosti korištena je skala zabrinutosti za privatnost, konstruirana za ovo istraživanje na osnovi rezultata predistraživanja o načinima kako ispitanici razumiju privatnost i ugrožavanje privatnosti. Za mjerenje bihevioralnih varijabli korištene su tri skale prilagođene za primjenu u Hrvatskoj: društvena dimenzija kontrole ponašanja, opći oprez i tehnička zaštita. Sudionicima je postavljeno i nekoliko konkretnih pitanja o korištenju interneta i društvenih mreža. Istraživanje je provedeno primjenom ankete na prigodnom uzorku od ukupno 966 sudionika. Dobiveni rezultati pokazali su postojanje paradoksa privatnosti na sve tri usporedbe na nivou p < 0,001. Unatoč tome što je 90,7% sudionika navelo kako im je privatnost važna ili izrazito važna, velik broj sudionika koristi usluge onih tvrtki čiji je cijeli poslovni model baziran na prikupljanju, analiziranju i dijeljenju korisničkih podataka. Njih 99,3% koristi jednu od takvih tražilica, 86% neki od takvih servisa e-pošte, 88% koristi društvenu mrežu Facebook, na kojoj ih više od 73% ima navedeno svoje pravo ime i prezime te osobnu fotografiju. Dobiveni rezultati pokazuju kako je sudionicima deklarativno važna njihova privatnost, no kako je se vrlo lako odriču kada se radi o korištenju interneta i društvenih mreža, što ima značajne implikacije na aktualnu raspravu o zaštiti privatnosti i osobnih podataka u digitalnom okruženju.","PeriodicalId":43401,"journal":{"name":"Politicka Misao-Croatian Political Science Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.20901/PM.56.1.05","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67613786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Znanstvenici o reformama znanosti iz 2013.","authors":"J. Švarc, Drago Čengić, Saša Poljanec-Borić, Jasminka Lažnjak","doi":"10.20901/PM.56.1.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20901/PM.56.1.01","url":null,"abstract":"Vlada Republike Hrvatske provela je 2013. godine niz reformi znanstvenoistraživačkog sustava s ciljem povećanja njegove izvrsnosti i međunarodne konkurentnosti. Želeći analizirati dosege spomenutih reformi, 2017. godine provedeno je istraživanje o tome kako znanstvenici, nakon četiri godine rada u novom sustavu, percipiraju promjene u strukturi znanstvenoistraživačkog rada. Empirijsko istraživanje provedeno je dvoetapno, kvalitativnom i kvantitativnom metodom, na namjernom kvotnom uzorku prema znanstvenim disciplinama, institucijama i zvanjima. Rezultati pokazuju da su reforme dovele do određenih organizacijskih unapređenja te do uvođenja veće kompetitivnosti u istraživačkoj zajednici, ali da su istovremeno proizvele i niz neželjenih posljedica, ugrozivši među ostalim materijalnu osnovu znanstvenog rada te transparentnost i javnost djelovanja znanstvenog sustava. Zbog toga je opravdano postaviti pitanje: je li potreban novi zaokret u hrvatskoj znanstvenoj politici.","PeriodicalId":43401,"journal":{"name":"Politicka Misao-Croatian Political Science Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.20901/PM.56.1.01","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67613968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Seneca’s De Clementia. An Overlooked Chapter in the Genealogies of Representation and Sovereignty","authors":"Gonzalo Bustamante Kuschel","doi":"10.20901/pm.55.4.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20901/pm.55.4.02","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43401,"journal":{"name":"Politicka Misao-Croatian Political Science Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.20901/pm.55.4.02","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49631786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Thomas Hobbes and the Political Economy of Peace","authors":"P. Springborg","doi":"10.20901/PM.55.4.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20901/PM.55.4.01","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43401,"journal":{"name":"Politicka Misao-Croatian Political Science Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.20901/PM.55.4.01","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67614003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"No-platforming and Safe Spaces: Should Universities Censor more (or less) Speech than the Law Requires?","authors":"Eric Heinze","doi":"10.20901/PM.55.4.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20901/PM.55.4.04","url":null,"abstract":"How should higher education respond to legally mandated limits on hateful, discriminatory, or provocative speech? Should public universities fortify government rules in the name of equal dignity for vulnerable groups, by imposing even further restrictions of their own? Or should they oppose such restrictions in the name of free speech? Or should they do neither, seeking neither amplification nor repeal, instead simply joining in whatever the government status quo happens to be, as they would do with most other background legal rules? This article advocates the second position: through a brief examination of ‘no-platforming’ and ‘safe space’ polices, it is argued that, within fully-fledged democracies, viewpoint-selective censorship is always indefensible for higher education. Examples are drawn from high-profile controversies involving far-right speakers as well as pro- and anti-Israel speech. Viewpoint-based censorship generates one of two scenarios, neither of which coheres with the mission of higher education. One the one hand, no-platformers’ declared principles could never be applied with ethical coherence without becoming so broad as to require massive censorship. On the other hand, if those principles are to apply only rarely, then they lose internal consistency and become outright ad hoc impositions of campus decision-makers’ own political preferences.","PeriodicalId":43401,"journal":{"name":"Politicka Misao-Croatian Political Science Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.20901/PM.55.4.04","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67614123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Legal Regulation of Hate Speech: The International and European Frameworks","authors":"Natalie Alkiviadou","doi":"10.20901/PM.55.4.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20901/PM.55.4.08","url":null,"abstract":"Hate speech is a threat to the proper functioning of a democratic society and a damning force to central values such as respect and solidarity. It harms us on an interpersonal, community and societal level and ‘is speech that intentionally attacks a person or a group based on race, ethnicity, gender, disability, sexual orientation, religion, or any other prohibited criterion.’ In a world of rising populism and far-right extremism, hate speech, as a by-product of such phenomena needs seriously to be addressed. On an international and European level, the tools that have been developed to this end are mechanisms, which directly prohibit certain types of speech. At the same time, international and European documents provide for the restriction of free speech if such speech, inter alia, violates the rights of others. The documents that will be discussed in this paper also include non-destruction clauses, an avenue which has been used predominantly by the European Court of Human Rights to oust negationst and revisionist speech from Convention protection. This paper will assess the relevant provisions that exist on an international (United Nations) and European (European Union and Council of Europe) level, to tackle hate speech. As a first step, the paper will elaborate on the definitional and contextual arena of hate speech and will proceed to look at the United Nations (UN). In particular, it will analyse Article 4 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD), which prohibits, amongst others, the dissemination of ideas of racial superiority. It will then assess Article 20(2) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) on the prohibition of any advocacy for religious, national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence. As well as the substance of the aforementioned articles and the related jurisprudence of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) and the Human Rights Committee (HRC), the paper will also consider other documents such as General Recommendations and Concluding Observations. Following the UN framework, the paper will look at the Framework Decision on Combating Certain Forms and Expressions of Racism and Xenophobia by means of Criminal Law, which is the only legal tool existing at a European Union (EU) level to tackle hate speech. As reflected in its title, it is limited to racist and xenophobic speech. The paper will subsequently consider the Council of Europe’s Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime, Concerning the Criminalisation of Acts of a Racist and Xenophobic Nature Committed through Computer Systems as the only tool on this level, to tackle hate speech directly, albeit only that appearing online. It will close with the key case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) which sets out the position of the Court in interpreting the limits of Article 10 of the Eu","PeriodicalId":43401,"journal":{"name":"Politicka Misao-Croatian Political Science Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.20901/PM.55.4.08","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67613810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Hate Speech, Contentious Symbols and Politics of Memory: Survey Research on Croatian Citizens’ Attitudes","authors":"N. Blanuša, Enes Kulenović","doi":"10.20901/PM.55.4.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20901/PM.55.4.07","url":null,"abstract":"The authors are presenting and interpreting the data on Croatian citizens’ attitudes on regulating hate speech, contentious symbols and public commemoration. The data was collected in two nation-wide surveys conducted in 2016 and 2018. The data is analyzed within a normative framework of militant democracy versus anti-democratic tendencies. In the conclusion the authors, invoking the available data, advocate a minimal model of regulating public speech by focusing on public utterances of direct and symbolic hate speech.","PeriodicalId":43401,"journal":{"name":"Politicka Misao-Croatian Political Science Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.20901/PM.55.4.07","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47386452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}