{"title":"Birds and Environmental Management in Australia 1901–2001","authors":"L. Robin","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2001.10648519","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2001.10648519","url":null,"abstract":"This article reviews the central role of birds in environmental management in Australia throughout the twentieth century. Ai well as being indicators of the health of the environment, birds are also central to many ideas about the environment, as examples from three periods of environmental history show. In the early federation era around 1901, the central concern was for the birds themselves, threatened by the plumage trade. In the mid-century years, there was a growing concern for habitat, as conservation ideas became dominated by national parks. The last decades of the twentieth century, the ‘age of biodiversity’, have seen the emphasis move to species-richness. Because birds are conspicuous, diurnal and much loved by people, they have dominated ideas about environmental management. The advantages of using birds as environmental indicators include free labour' and community participation, but these also magnify responsibilities to ensure that the science that is built on amateur time, freely given, will give the best possible result for the environment.","PeriodicalId":425760,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"231 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131645515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Managing the Residual Risk","authors":"J. Handmer, Jann A. Williams","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2001.10648535","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2001.10648535","url":null,"abstract":"The risk management standard and the associated environmental guide set out a process for establishing risk, its acceptability and appropriate management for whatever issue is at hand. However, some risk usually remains for a host of reasons including lack of knowledge and resources, as well as the impossibility of having a risk free world. In many cases this remaining or residual risk may be well understood, easily managed, or unimportant. However, in other cases the opposite may hold. Residual risk is usually considered ‘acceptable’, or more accurately ‘tolerable’, and from a management perspective is therefore often ignored. In some cases, the residual risk may be unacceptable from an ecological or environmental perspective, even if it seems acceptable from an economic perspective. Even though the chance of a negative event occurring would normally be low, the consequences could nevertheless be very serious or irreversible. In this article, we describe residual risk, how it emerges from the process of risk management, and why it is particularly important in natural resource management. A case study illustrates some of the issues and possible ways forward. The risk management standard should be applied through a process designed to build commitment by stakeholders to manage the risks and develop contingency plans for the residual. Local capacity building may often be an important pre-requisite for the success of this approach.","PeriodicalId":425760,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116669705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Towards Sustainable Pastoralism in Australia's Rangelands","authors":"D. M. Stafford, S. Morton, A. Ash","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2000.10648501","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2000.10648501","url":null,"abstract":"The Australian rangelands are spatially complex, variable to the point where reactions to disturbance are often unpredictable, and generally uneconomic to rehabilitate once damaged. Hence some areas of the rangelands are inherently prone to degradation through management mistakes. Further, economically optimum short-term stocking rates are often well above what the environment seems able to tolerate in the long-term. Because pastoralists rationally discount future production, it pays them to graze heavily; bur this is ultimately an institutional problem, not the fault of the pastoralists. In this article, we outline an approach to identifying regions that should be resilient under grazing and where pastoralism may be sustainable due to sufficiently dependable productivity and profitability. We suggest that if grazing is not phased out as a primary land use in non-resilient regions, then they will continue to experience serious decline. We argue that policy paralysis has come about because of the false assumption (in practice if not rhetoric) that the problems of one region are the same as those of another. Management would improve if governments engineered policies to give private enterprise freedom to pursue profit in resilient environments, and to provide for greater public management in regions where unreasonable levels of altruism are required to meet the goal of sustainable land use.","PeriodicalId":425760,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127154770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Does MODSS Offer an Alternative to Traditional Approaches to Natural Resource Management Decision-making?","authors":"J. Robinson","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2000.10648498","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2000.10648498","url":null,"abstract":"There is an increasing awareness, on the part of decision-makers, of the need to develop new or to extend traditional evaluation techniques to facilitate a multidisciplinary and participatory approach to decision-making. Such an approach would be particularly appropriate for decision-making with respect to the management of natural resources. Not only are there multiple objectives involved but also many of the identified objectives are competing and conflicting. Traditional techniques to assist decision-making which focus on establishing the economic efficiency of an investment or management decision, do not pay sufficient attention to providing information about the nature and extent of the trade-offs involved. This article presents a multiple objective decision-support system (MODSS) which was developed to assist decision-making for a catchment in Far North Queensland. The MODSS approach is shown to be a process, capable of incorporating information from a number of disciplines as well as the preferences of identified groups of stakeholders, to support the prioritisation of options to manage land and water resources.","PeriodicalId":425760,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"189 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126031689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Economic Assessment of Remnant Native Vegetation Conservation","authors":"M. Lockwood, S. Walpole","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2000.10648505","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2000.10648505","url":null,"abstract":"The economic values associated with conserving remnant native vegetation (RNV) on private property in Northeast Victoria and the Murray catchment NSW were assessed. Depending on the assumptions made, the net economic costs to landholders of a change from the current situation to a proposed conservation scenario in Northeast Victoria ranged from $113.0 million to $30.9 million. The corresponding figures for the Murray catchment were $52.9 million to $35.1 million. Community willingness to pay for RNV conservation was assessed using choice modelling. The aggregate benefit of conserving RNV in Northeast Victoria was $60.7 million, and in the Murray catchment $75.6 million. The catchment benefits were assessed in terms of the role RNV conservation plays in mitigating dryland salinity and contributing to carbon sequestration. These net benefits over a 40 year period were estimated to be $7.4 million in Northeast Victoria and $7.9 million in the Murray catchment. The three value components, net on-farm costs, community benefits and catchment benefits, were integrated into a benefit cost analysis. The results of the analysis indicated that under most conditions, there was a net economic benefit in conserving RNV. For example, given a 5 year time horizon and a discount rate of 7 per cent, governments could spend up to $29.8 million in Northeast Victoria and $40.5 million in the Murray catchment and still achieve a net economic benefit, provided conservation outcomes were achieved. A publicly funded incentive policy that enabled landholders to manage their RNV according to the conservation scenario would, under most circumstances, yield net economic benefits.","PeriodicalId":425760,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128697100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
R. Grayson, S. Ewing, R. Argent, B. Finlayson, T. McMahon
{"title":"On the Adoption of Research and Development Outcomes in Integrated Catchment Management","authors":"R. Grayson, S. Ewing, R. Argent, B. Finlayson, T. McMahon","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2000.10648496","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2000.10648496","url":null,"abstract":"This article is intended to stimulate discussion on the implications of current approaches to improving the integration and adoption of research and development (R&D) in integrated catchment management (ICM). We argue that there are a series of barriers to improvements in the integration and adoption of research and development in ICM associated with fundamental characteristics of the research endeavour and the specific strategies that have been used by R&D funding organisations, particularly those focussed on the project level. Recent moves towards funding commissioned work, aimed largely at synthesising information into more ‘usable’ forms, may overcome some of the project level limitations, but the extent to which R&D organisations and researchers should take on the ‘extension’ role (or ‘implementation function’) is less clear. R&D organisations need to avoid responding to changes in funding for ‘implementation functions’ at the federal and state level by attempting to fill the gap themselves, unless significantly increased resources are made available. There is not enough money to be effective, many factors that affect success are outside the control of the organisation, and in the necessary shifting of resources, the core activity of R&D will suffer. New regional ICM organisations, probably in partnership with R&D funders, may be placed to undertake the implementation function. This would enable the bulk of the R&D agencies' resources to be focussed on undertaking high quality R&D, while providing the linkages important to effective on-ground action.","PeriodicalId":425760,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"151 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115279057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"External Verification of the Australian Minerals Industry Code for Environment Management: A Case Study","authors":"F. Solomon","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2000.10648489","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2000.10648489","url":null,"abstract":"External verification of industry's environmental and social performance is an increasingly popular strategy for improving accountability. However, do these processes of verification ultimately add up to a more accountable company or industry? This article describes a case study of external verification in the Australian mining industry. It introduces the Australian Minerals Industry Code for Environmental Management and explores how concepts of accountability and verification have been embedded within it. The case study, a verification process commissioned by Placer Dome Asia Pacific and the research process that accompanied it, is then discussed in brief. The difference between verifying systems and verifying outcomes from those systems is explored. Finally, the article concludes with some recommendations for external verification, both of the Code and of environmental, social or sustainability performance in general.","PeriodicalId":425760,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123932469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Science, Communication and Stakeholder Participation for Integrated Natural Resource Management","authors":"A. Johnson, D. Walker","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2000.10648488","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2000.10648488","url":null,"abstract":"Arhetorical move towards participatory resource planning has underpinned much policy in Australian natural resource management and rural development for the past decade. Research providers have only recently begun to understand the context of complex problem settings, multiple stakeholders, divergent interests and scales of relevance associated with integrated natural resource planning and management activities. Most traditional research approaches in the natural resource planning and management domain have favoured a linear model of technology transfer. Increasingly it is being acknowledged that consideration of the needs of stakeholders forms an integral part of the research and adoption continuum from design to inception and from development through to delivery. Participative research processes provide an extremely powerful means of responding to these needs. However their use raises fundamental methodological and institutional issues as to how Research and Development (R&D) is conducted, what constitutes an outcome, who controls the agenda and R&D providers accountability to others. In particular, it also challenges the way in which R&D providers communicate both internally and externally, and the role of communication and communication research. In this article we use a case study approach to describe how a multidisciplinary team in CSIRO has responded to the R&D and communication challenges arising from involvement in stakeholder participation processes. This has underpinned improved natural resource planning and management in the Herbert River catchment of north Queensland.","PeriodicalId":425760,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"233 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114441285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“The Answer My Friend is Blowin' in the Wind”…Or is It? Successful Local Opposition to a Proposed Windfarm Development in Regional Victoria","authors":"L. Hislop, D. Mercer, G. Wescott","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2000.10648490","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2000.10648490","url":null,"abstract":"Around the world, but particularly in Western Europe and North America, wind energy is being promoted strongly by turbine manufacturers, ‘green’ consumers, and some governments, as a significant potential alternative to electricity production from traditional, coal-fired, hydro or nuclear generating sources. As a consequence, many countries and states have embraced this technology with enthusiasm. At the same time, opposition to large-scale wind farms, especially in areas of high scenic amenity, is also growing in some countries. This article places this debate in the Australian context by focusing on renewable energy policy and successful local opposition to a proposed wind farm development near Portland, in Western Victoria. It is argued that this particular conflict has important lessons for future windfarm proposals in coastal settings elsewhere in Australia.","PeriodicalId":425760,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129792594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Environment Related Human Disease Indicators: Contribution to State of the Environment Reporting","authors":"T. Sladden, K. Luckie, J. Simpson","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2000.10648487","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2000.10648487","url":null,"abstract":"Since the release of Australia's first State of the Environment (SoE) report, a variety of physical environmental indicators have been determined for each SoE environmental management theme (the atmosphere, water {inland, estuarine and sea}, the land, biodiversity, heritage and human settlement). While monitoring these physical themes is fundamental to environmental protection, there are opportunities to expand SoE reporting within the broader context of sustainable development. Indicators of social welfare, equity and human health all have environmental components, both in terms of cause and effect. This has been recognised in the 1999 National Environmental Health Strategy which recommends the identification of indicators of environmental hazard, human health outcomes and environmental management processes to ameliorate these. Illustrating the effects of environmental degradation in terms of human health can increase community awareness of the relevance of environmental management or protection approaches. This article attempts to define a preliminary set of population health environmental indicators (PHEIs) that could be incorporated into SoE indicator sets. Such human health indicators can be used both as measures of environmental quality, as well as to illustrate how environmental degradation impacts on human health and quality of life. All indicators are developed from routinely collected health data sources to enable trend monitoring. Some examples are given of typical PHEIs produced for use within a NSW regional area.","PeriodicalId":425760,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134359524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}