自然资源综合管理的科学、传播和利益相关者参与

A. Johnson, D. Walker
{"title":"自然资源综合管理的科学、传播和利益相关者参与","authors":"A. Johnson, D. Walker","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2000.10648488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arhetorical move towards participatory resource planning has underpinned much policy in Australian natural resource management and rural development for the past decade. Research providers have only recently begun to understand the context of complex problem settings, multiple stakeholders, divergent interests and scales of relevance associated with integrated natural resource planning and management activities. Most traditional research approaches in the natural resource planning and management domain have favoured a linear model of technology transfer. Increasingly it is being acknowledged that consideration of the needs of stakeholders forms an integral part of the research and adoption continuum from design to inception and from development through to delivery. Participative research processes provide an extremely powerful means of responding to these needs. However their use raises fundamental methodological and institutional issues as to how Research and Development (R&D) is conducted, what constitutes an outcome, who controls the agenda and R&D providers accountability to others. In particular, it also challenges the way in which R&D providers communicate both internally and externally, and the role of communication and communication research. In this article we use a case study approach to describe how a multidisciplinary team in CSIRO has responded to the R&D and communication challenges arising from involvement in stakeholder participation processes. This has underpinned improved natural resource planning and management in the Herbert River catchment of north Queensland.","PeriodicalId":425760,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"233 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Science, Communication and Stakeholder Participation for Integrated Natural Resource Management\",\"authors\":\"A. Johnson, D. Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14486563.2000.10648488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Arhetorical move towards participatory resource planning has underpinned much policy in Australian natural resource management and rural development for the past decade. Research providers have only recently begun to understand the context of complex problem settings, multiple stakeholders, divergent interests and scales of relevance associated with integrated natural resource planning and management activities. Most traditional research approaches in the natural resource planning and management domain have favoured a linear model of technology transfer. Increasingly it is being acknowledged that consideration of the needs of stakeholders forms an integral part of the research and adoption continuum from design to inception and from development through to delivery. Participative research processes provide an extremely powerful means of responding to these needs. However their use raises fundamental methodological and institutional issues as to how Research and Development (R&D) is conducted, what constitutes an outcome, who controls the agenda and R&D providers accountability to others. In particular, it also challenges the way in which R&D providers communicate both internally and externally, and the role of communication and communication research. In this article we use a case study approach to describe how a multidisciplinary team in CSIRO has responded to the R&D and communication challenges arising from involvement in stakeholder participation processes. This has underpinned improved natural resource planning and management in the Herbert River catchment of north Queensland.\",\"PeriodicalId\":425760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"233 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2000.10648488\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2000.10648488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

过去十年来,在澳大利亚自然资源管理和农村发展方面,向参与性资源规划的口头行动已成为许多政策的基础。研究提供者直到最近才开始了解复杂问题设置的背景,多个利益相关者,不同的利益和与综合自然资源规划和管理活动相关的尺度。自然资源规划和管理领域的大多数传统研究方法都倾向于技术转让的线性模型。越来越多的人认识到,考虑利益相关者的需求是研究和采用连续体的一个组成部分,从设计到开始,从开发到交付。参与性研究过程为满足这些需求提供了一种极其有力的手段。然而,它们的使用提出了基本的方法和制度问题,如研究与开发(R&D)是如何进行的,什么构成了结果,谁控制议程以及研发提供者对他人的责任。特别是,它还挑战了研发提供者内部和外部沟通的方式,以及沟通和沟通研究的作用。在本文中,我们使用案例研究方法来描述CSIRO的多学科团队如何应对参与利益相关者参与过程所产生的研发和沟通挑战。这为改善昆士兰州北部赫伯特河流域的自然资源规划和管理提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Science, Communication and Stakeholder Participation for Integrated Natural Resource Management
Arhetorical move towards participatory resource planning has underpinned much policy in Australian natural resource management and rural development for the past decade. Research providers have only recently begun to understand the context of complex problem settings, multiple stakeholders, divergent interests and scales of relevance associated with integrated natural resource planning and management activities. Most traditional research approaches in the natural resource planning and management domain have favoured a linear model of technology transfer. Increasingly it is being acknowledged that consideration of the needs of stakeholders forms an integral part of the research and adoption continuum from design to inception and from development through to delivery. Participative research processes provide an extremely powerful means of responding to these needs. However their use raises fundamental methodological and institutional issues as to how Research and Development (R&D) is conducted, what constitutes an outcome, who controls the agenda and R&D providers accountability to others. In particular, it also challenges the way in which R&D providers communicate both internally and externally, and the role of communication and communication research. In this article we use a case study approach to describe how a multidisciplinary team in CSIRO has responded to the R&D and communication challenges arising from involvement in stakeholder participation processes. This has underpinned improved natural resource planning and management in the Herbert River catchment of north Queensland.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信