{"title":"Մութազիլիզմի կրոնափիլիսոփայական դրույթների արտացոլումը Աբու Ֆաթհ ալ-Շահրաստանիի «կրոնների և աղանդների մասին» (كتاب الملل والنحل ) աշխատության մեջ","authors":"Անուշ Թամրազյան","doi":"10.56549/29537819-2022.3-75","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56549/29537819-2022.3-75","url":null,"abstract":"The work \"On Religions and Sects\" (“Kitāb al-Milal wa-l-Niḥal”) of 11th-12th centuries theologian and philosopher Abu al-Fath Muhammad ibn Abd al-Karim al-Shahrastani, written in 1127, is considered to be the first work of encyclopedic value. It is unique and stands out among the theological works of its time, primarily for its inclusion: from the teachings of the pre-Islamic period to the history of Islam, the presentation of the teachings of its main directions. The author systematically formulated the main problems of theology, which should be the basis for describing various teachings. Presenting the basic teachings (sects) of Islam, the author stands out also with a relatively impartial approach. In the chapter on Mu'tazilism, the author outlines its main religious and philosophical provisions, common to all Mu'tazilian teachings. Then he discusses in detail the teachings of all Mu'tazilite schools, their similarities and differences, sometimes disagreeing with them. The author substantiates this disagreement mainly with the evidence quoted from the Qur'an, trying to be very moderate, conscientious, thereby providing a great deal of material for further research.","PeriodicalId":425618,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Oriental Sources","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133778575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Հայ տոհմածին տիկնանց իշխանականդիրքը եւ հավակնություններն ըստ միջնադարյան հիշատակագրերի","authors":"Նազենի Ղարիբյան","doi":"10.56549/29537819-2022.3-110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56549/29537819-2022.3-110","url":null,"abstract":"Les inscriptions lapidaires et les colophons des manuscrits arméniens médiévaux contiennent certains renseignements concernant les femmes, qui peuvent aider à mieux comprendre leur statut social, leur position dans la famille et dans la société. L'analyse de l'ensemble de ce corpus permet de constater que dans la société médiévale arménienne, l'origine familiale, la généalogie et l'échelle sociale comptaient beaucoup plus que le genre (gender). Surtout dans le milieu aristocratique, en raison de la structure dynastique et héréditaire du système politicosocial arménien, l'appartenance de souche à telle ou telle vieille famille dynastique prévalait à tout autre position et charge; ainsi, la « noblesse de race » était une dignité inaliénable, même si les familles aient perdu, au fil des siècles, leurs titres politiques ou leurs domaines fonciers. D'après les documents en question, cette dignité aurait dû être octroyée également aux membres femelles des grandes familles, qui gardaient la notion de l'échelle aristocratique et l'exprimaient dument sur leur inscriptions memorielles en se présentant avant tout par leur nom, leur descendance et leur position et, dans certains cas, en omettant ceux de leur époux. Cette tendance devient symptomatique à l'Epoque des Royaumes (IXe - XIe siècle) et trouve son apogée à la période suivante (XIIe -XIVe ), surtout dans les régions nordest de l'Arménie où une nouvelle aristocratie dirigente étaient formée à l'issue de la campagne de libération arméno-géorgienne contre la domination seldjukide.","PeriodicalId":425618,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Oriental Sources","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114473722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Epistolary exchanges, Treatises and Opuscules: Armenian Sources on Religious Polemics between the Armenians and the Greeks in the 12th century","authors":"Isabelle Augé","doi":"10.56549/29537819-2022.3-88","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56549/29537819-2022.3-88","url":null,"abstract":"Հայերի և հույների միջև, հատկապես ԺԲ դարում ծավալված եկեղեցական փոխհարաբերությունների ընթացքում, ստեղծվել են բազմաթիվ բնագրեր հայերեն կամ հունարեն լեզուներով: Հոդվածում քննարկել ենք մի քանի հայկական սկզբնաղբյուրներ: Դրանցից ամենակարևորը 1165-1178 թթ. կողմերի միջև փոխանակված նամակների ժողովածուն է, որը կազմել է Ներսէս Լամբրոնացին: Բացի այդ, պատասխանով հանդերձ պահպանվել է «Գլխադրութիւնք հոռոմոց, զորս պահանջեն առ ի մէնջ ի պէտս խաղաղութեան» երկը: Վերջապես, հասել է թղթերի ժողովածուն (ՊԽՄ), ուր մի շարք թղթեր ունեն պատմական բացատրություններ, և 1197 թ. Կ. Պոլիս ուղարկված Ներսես Լամբրոնացու դեսպանագնացության նկարագրությունը:","PeriodicalId":425618,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Oriental Sources","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132168227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Մեծ Հայքի Գուգարք նահանգն ըստ Է Դարի «Աշխարհացոյց»-ի","authors":"Ալեքսան Յակոբեան","doi":"10.56549/29537819-2022.3-32","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56549/29537819-2022.3-32","url":null,"abstract":"The Armenian geographical work “Ashkharhac'oyc'”, which was created for use by members of the Armenian delegation as an auxiliary material at the so-called Persian Council in Ctesiphon (616 or 618), gives a rather detailed description of the province of Gugarq (graec. Γωγαρηνή). According to this description, Gugarq consisted of 9 regions (gavars), which were separated from the Armenian country and included in the neighboring marzpanat of Iberia (Virq, Qartli) at the end of the 4th century. However, in the description of Iberia, 12 regions are listed that were torn away from Armenia. We associate this phenomenon with the main Bdešx (the Kurfyurst) function of the region of Tashir, who for this received rights over three additional regions (Bołnopor, Quishapor and Mangleac'por). A careful study of the text of “Ashxarhac'oyc'” makes it possible to clarify the localization and boundary lines of several regions of Gugark, which were previously proposed by Suren Yeremyan and Babken Harutyun-yan. This is especially true for the regions of Kangarq, Trełq, Tsobopor, Bołnopor and Quishapor. The article is accompanied by a map of Gugarq, which was compiled with the help of Ruben Tarumyan.","PeriodicalId":425618,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Oriental Sources","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114709224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}